kotsy
Senior Member
Aftermath of the Logan bridge demolition on the LSE corridor:
I will pop in here, and express disappointment that there is nothing substantive that advances existing or GO 2.0 projects in the provincial budget.
Why don't they just put an elevator for accessibility purposes?I took a photo a couple of days ago of the new Drury Lane pedestrian bridge from the GO Train. The tarp-covered area is the curing poured concrete over rebar that will make up the deck of the bridge. This makes be believe that this is the bridge itself and not just structure that will support a separate bridge deck.
View attachment 651861
Edit: Confirmed that this is the bridge deck. Here's the rendering of the whole project:
View attachment 651862
It's kind of obnoxious that there is no stairwell option to permit those who are able-bodied to avoid having to get their steps in by walking around eight loops of the ramp (up and down). A bit of measuring on Google Earth suggests each circuit is about 60 metres. With a 25-ish metre bridge, crossing the tracks will require about a 500-metre walk.
Source
Wait, so you're saying the four bridge upgrades happening right now is only the start? Doesn't LE have a ton of rail over road bridges in Toronto East? Or are a lot of those more recently constructed with allowances for an additional track? Because if all or most of those need upgrading, then I don't see how electrification infrastructure can even start anytime soon let alone finish.I think (but am not sure), that is under at least 5 different contracts.
Some of the Ontario Line bridges are under that advanced contract between East Harbour and Pape for the alignment. But I think Gerrard is under the station construction contract. Meanwhile bridge widenings between between Cherry and Yonge are under a different contract. Woodbine was under an advance contract for the Lakeshore East OnCorridor - and I think that some other bridges further east are under OnCorridor itself.
But it's a bit of a stab in the dark.
As to how many construction companies? Lots.
I sure hope they're leaving enough space under there for a third track.View attachment 651877Progress on grade separation of Mississauga Road over the Halton Sub of the Kitchener Line.
I think they just copied the design of the old bridge, with a extra couple switchbacks, since the new Drury bridge has to be a bit higher than the old one to allow for electrification. The old bridge would have been around a 300 metre walk I think? I agree that stairs would be nice.I took a photo a couple of days ago of the new Drury Lane pedestrian bridge from the GO Train. The tarp-covered area is the curing poured concrete over rebar that will make up the deck of the bridge. This makes be believe that this is the bridge itself and not just structure that will support a separate bridge deck.
View attachment 651861
Edit: Confirmed that this is the bridge deck. Here's the rendering of the whole project:
View attachment 651862
It's kind of obnoxious that there is no stairwell option to permit those who are able-bodied to avoid having to get their steps in by walking around eight loops of the ramp (up and down). A bit of measuring on Google Earth suggests each circuit is about 60 metres. With a 25-ish metre bridge, crossing the tracks will require about a 500-metre walk.
Source
Well, I haven't counted.Wait, so you're saying the four bridge upgrades happening right now is only the start? Doesn't LE have a ton of rail over road bridges in Toronto East? Or are a lot of those more recently constructed with allowances for an additional track? Because if all or most of those need upgrading, then I don't see how electrification infrastructure can even start anytime soon let alone finish.
Cost, they need repairs from time to time, breakdown are a few reasons elevators not in the picture. How does an accessibly person use the walkway when the elevator is not in service?? An able person needs to use stairs at a cost is a reason a ramp should be not use who would do some walking? Not all able people want to climb stair in the first place.Why don't they just put an elevator for accessibility purposes?
I keep being told behind the scenes someone is working on Milton and I just have to be patient. Are you suggesting these people maybe wrong?GO 2.0 appears to mostly be a "study" initiative. Milton in particular shows little forward direction.
Mostly a reheat of past commitments.
- Paul
Why don't they just put an elevator for accessibility purposes?