What do you think of this project?


  • Total voters
    42
The city needs at the very least a minimum architectural design standard so we don't have garbage proposals like Massey Ferguson.
100%. And neither was I thinking of you @NicolBolas when I made my "Ed-Neg" comment. I encourage people to speak loudly in reference to poorly conceived Architectural Proposals -- there is no valid excuse for any of them being built. On the other hand people who excuse the inexcusable because it increases density or because it obliterates surface parking need to shake their collective heads twice -- we don't need insufferable architecture to take the place of either.
 
I think you can love your city and celebrate its strengths while also wanting it to improve. And I think there's a difference between (most of us on here) bitching about the poorly-designed, ugly-as-shit buildings that are popping up all over the map and just bitching about how shitty our city is. So I agree, we need to demand better!
In addition to generalized statements about ugly buildings, we probably need to name and shame a number of them starting with the worst, which arguably is here.
 
If my mother were alive I would not be writing home to tell her about this. The flag is the most exciting element in this presentation. What a waste of a downtown City block!
It is pretty bad when you have to add a flag in to either improve it, distract from it, or maybe both. I feel the old saying patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel has some relevance here.
 

Back
Top