News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

I believe the Nine Creeks trail can't be extended because of the electrical infrastructure west of Stanfield Road. I like the other connections though. I think there's also been a linear park proposed south of the QEW between Ogden Ave and Applewood road, which could link into this (EDIT: though crossing Dixie south of the Queensway would be an issue).

There are several areas where the 9 creeks trail has a break in it because of electrical infrastructure, not only 1km west at Cwartha and Asta, people have to leave the trail and take a paved shoulder on N service road.

The same can be done for Stanfield. After that infrastructure the hydro ROW is unobstructed.
 
Very disappointingly, Councillor Colle has come out against the Marlee bike lanes and is putting forward a motion to cancel the planned construction of the Beltline Connection.


This is a project that would make a great difference to Marlee. It's been discussed here before but in addition to connecting the east and west sections of the Beltline, it would also eliminate the bike lane gap between Winona and Roselawn, meaning that a person could bike from Lawrence Avenue all the way south to the waterfront on a dedicated bike network. Particularly, this would also create a safe cycling connection for the apartment neighbourhood between Roselawn and Viewmount.

Here is the link to the agenda item if anyone wants to submit a comment in support (https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.MM30.13).

The construction was originally intended to have started already, obviously that didn't happen and it's just so sad that a councillor would try to knife a project that's already been approved by Council and that would make so many of his constituent's lives better.
 
Very disappointingly, Councillor Colle has come out against the Marlee bike lanes and is putting forward a motion to cancel the planned construction of the Beltline Connection.
I hate to be agist - but perhaps this is why we shouldn't have 80-year old councillors that are completely out of touch with society.
 
I hate to be agist - but perhaps this is why we shouldn't have 80-year old councillors that are completely out of touch with society.

Colle hasn't been all that unfriendly to cycling, he backed the approval of these lanes in the first place.

There has been a very vocal, very loud campaign by some locals to oppose the cycling infra here.

His office has been hearing from them.

I don't agree w/his action here, but he's not out of touch, he's weighing the impacts on his reelection bid...next year.

***

He needs a 2/3 majority re-open. This is routinely granted, but the right lobbying might see this time be different.
 
Colle hasn't been all that unfriendly to cycling, he backed the approval of these lanes in the first place.

There has been a very vocal, very loud campaign by some locals to oppose the cycling infra here.

His office has been hearing from them.

I don't agree w/his action here, but he's not out of touch, he's weighing the impacts on his reelection bid...next year.

***

He needs a 2/3 majority re-open. This is routinely granted, but the right lobbying might see this time be different.
I think it's performative. This way he can say he listened to his constituents' needs and has a record showing that he took action on same, and can then throw his hands up in feigned frustration when council inevitably does not back his motion to amend.
 
Colle hasn't been all that unfriendly to cycling, he backed the approval of these lanes in the first place.

There has been a very vocal, very loud campaign by some locals to oppose the cycling infra here.

His office has been hearing from them.

I don't agree w/his action here, but he's not out of touch, he's weighing the impacts on his reelection bid...next year.

***

He needs a 2/3 majority re-open. This is routinely granted, but the right lobbying might see this time be different.

Who are these locals lol? For the Marlee section down to Eglinton there are like less than a dozen house affected. No car lanes lost. No sidewalk lost. No on street parking lost. I can't think of a better solution for implementing cycling infrastructure on that stretch.

Is the loss of the sidewalk with it being converted a MUP the problem on Roselawn? I am fine with that not going ahead as it's duplicated by the planned Beltline extension, as long as they keep the bike lanes on the bridge over the Allen, and make a proper signalized crossing for the Beltline mid block.
 
Last edited:
Your questions answered, below:


"In the months after the approval, a group of homeowners and small businesses along the short stretch of Marlee Avenue between Roselawn and Eglinton began petitioning to “keep Marlee Avenue safe.”"

So it's Marlee section that's being protested the most. Ridiculous.

"Kyriakopoulos demonstrated by measuring heel-to-toe the various points where he contends the street is too narrow to accommodate the project, and showed me that he will no longer be able to park a car in the space in front of his two-car garage"
 
I previously posted on the opposition to Marlee.

The discussion starts here:


I called it overwrought and irrational.

I haven't changed my mind.
 
I previously posted on the opposition to Marlee.

The discussion starts here:


I called it overwrought and irrational.

I haven't changed my mind.
This is absurd. It's a great project bridging a key gap without having any impact on vehicle operations. It'll make traversing this stretch of Marlee safer and easier for cyclists, drivers, and pedestrians alike. Nobody should be listening to these fools.
 
In Montreal again, working, but really enjoying this first week of spring/summer. When not hotelling it downtown, I have a new lovely space to crash near Parc Baldwin, so a couple of blocks above Sherbrooke, close to Mont Royal. When not Bixie Biking, it is close to the bridge for points south and east of the river when i am ICEING it for the day.

Anyways, Bixie Bikes are great as usual, as are the separated bike lanes, as are no right turn on red lights at intersections. Doug Ford is at the beck and call of the 'only me first in my car' crowd. I just wish he could see the flocks of people scooting along major streets - school kids and younger to the more senior ages groups. In fact, and I should have taken a photo, there were backups of cyclers on the separated bike lanes on Rue Rachel the past couple of days. I guess its a routine happening and speaks to the volumes of people on two wheels. Time to expand the bike lanes! Or maybe a tunnel?

If I would grumble, ti would be the (seemingly) lack of good north/south routes, compared to the number of east/west routes. And why does Sherbrooke not have bike lanes (any lanes for that matter, paint seems to be in short supply in Montreal)?

I know Montreal is not perfect by any means (the health care system is a disaster) but there is a certain livability factor in the above, plus the neighbourhoods of 3/4/5 story walkups - density without towers, lovely living spaces with better then single family densities. Contrast that to Liberty Village (for an example) and you do question the need for that level of density.

Working from the crash pad today so Cappuccino time! Shout out to Croissant Croissant on Mont Royal and Toledo a little further along.
I'll be there next week. Cycling in Montréal in summer always feels so easy-breezy, if not a little bumpy.

In Toronto I bike a lot and always feel like I'm personally instigating a culture war against d***h***ds like Ford. Drivers here are just so aggressive around bikes.
 

Back
Top