[Richard White]

Depending on your mobile phone plan, using your cellular data for calls and texts can be expensive. But WiFi is usually cheaper, so using your internet connection instead can provide a cost-saving advantage. Cheaper to use WiFi than Cell service.

Fair but unless you are streaming Netflix on the subway it won't matter much. Checking a couple emails or seeing when your next bus is coming does not use much if any data.

I have 150 GB of Data and only use (at most) 3 to 5 GB each month (30 days).

Also.. long gone are the days where you were only able to send a certain number of texts before being charged.

 

[turbanplanner]

Honestly, it makes sense.

Wi-Fi in stations is somewhat pointless when it takes a minute or two to connect. By the time you have connected you either missed a train or the train is arriving.

Having a mobile signal in the station is far more useful.

I think it's a bad move. The contract was for 20 years and we cut it short half way through, it might be "ok" for most people in the city but it sucks for tourists.

The only reason it was slow is because they had issues with the authentication portal, I saw it changed providers many times.

 

[Monarch Butterfly]

Are the pay phones being returned to the underground stations?

 

[Richard White]

Are the pay phones being returned to the underground stations?

Why?

It costs more to operate and maintain them then they would get back in revenue.

 

[Monarch Butterfly]

Why?

It costs more to operate and maintain them then they would get back in revenue.

It was a joke, but then...

They have to put cell phone service at the very least in the stations and tunnels. WiFi would be better.

 

[turbanplanner]

Why?

It costs more to operate and maintain them then they would get back in revenue.

AFAIK the TTC (or anyone) got zero revenue from Bell and there was a multi thousand dollar install charge.

 

[Richard White]

It was a joke, but then...

They have to put cell phone service at the very least in the stations and tunnels. WiFi would be better.

The stations do have cell service Walter. Tunnels downtown do and they are supposedly expanding upon that.

 

[generalcanada]

He cited the “radical” drop in usage, and said the cost to replace TConnect, which has been estimated at $17 million, “does not feel like a wise investment.” For those who need public Wi-Fi access “there are literally thousands of connection points around the city,” Green said.

Holy shit what are theese access points running?
Theres no way it should be that much

 

[Northern Light]

Are the pay phones being returned to the underground stations?

When did they leave? When was that last time you were in a subway station, Walter?

Most, if not all, still have payphones. fewer than they used to, mind you, but they're still around.

 

[Richard White]

Most, if not all, still have payphones. fewer than they used to, mind you, but they're still around.

I believe they are kept there for safety reasons. In the event of an emergency they act as a hard line to emergency services.

 

[nfitz]

Having a mobile signal in the station is far more useful.

For those privileged enough to have paid Rogers more money for their expensive mobile data - sure.

I don't use food banks or homeless shelters either. Let's get rid of those too.

 

[Richard White]

For those privileged enough to have paid Rogers more money for their expensive mobile data - sure.

I was with Bell for 2 days last week. Both days I got a signal in subway stations.

FWIW Bell has an abysmal signal inside buildings.

 

[nfitz]

I was with Bell for 2 days last week. Both days I got a signal in subway stations.

FWIW Bell has an abysmal signal inside buildings.

Interesting - I'd have assumed you'd have needed a data plan from Bell - not just cellular. Does it work anywhere else, or just in subway stations.

 

[Richard White]

Interesting - I'd have assumed you'd have needed a data plan from Bell - not just cellular. Does it work anywhere else, or just in subway stations.

I did but honestly who doesn't?

My point was that there is cell service for more than just Rogers. You can call and text underground from other networks.

 

[nfitz]

I did but honestly who doesn't?

My teenager doesn't. Well she does have some for emergencies - but she has never touched it, even though I tell her to for some things.

My current plan doesn't have enough for me to scrolling the Internet for all my transit rides.

Sure, white privileged adults mostly have data.

My point was that there is cell service for more than just Rogers. You can call and text underground from other networks.

Of course. But my point was that Rogers will benefit from cutting the wi-fi, as some of those that do rely on the wi-fi will now send $ Rogers (and the others) way.

Rogers also benefits, as they are (were?) contractually required to maintain the wi-fi through 2032, at no cost to TTC.

So why let them off the hook, when GO Transit is touting how well their WiFi service is doing (it certainly connects better than TTC these days) - even though I'd think their average customer is MORE likely to have mobile data than the average TTC customer.