ADob
Active Member
Does anyone know what the story is here? This is basically an intersection of a busy street with a ...nothing burger of a street. I am absolutely stumped.
When the 102 ave bike lane was installed around 2017(?) there were no left turns allowed at this intersection to protect cyclists from being mowed over. Shortly after, the City changed their mind and brought in the current signaling as a compromise, since there wasn't enough space to have a dedicated left turn lane with an advance.Does anyone know what the story is here? This is basically an intersection of a busy street with a ...nothing burger of a street. I am absolutely stumped.
I waited in that left lane recently, drivers just changed into the right lane to get around me then got back into the left lane after the light.When the 102 ave bike lane was installed around 2017(?) there were no left turns allowed at this intersection to protect cyclists from being mowed over. Shortly after, the City changed their mind and brought in the current signaling as a compromise, since there wasn't enough space to have a dedicated left turn lane with an advance.
Despite popular thought, if the right lane signal is green and the left lane signal is red, you cannot legally proceed straight in the left lane.
F350. Shocker.Yet another pedestrian death in a suburban neighbourhood with ridiculously wide streets and intersections with unnecessarily long crossing distances: https://www.ctvnews.ca/edmonton/art...trian-dead-hit-by-truck-in-west-edmonton-eps/.
Where it happened, for context: https://maps.app.goo.gl/3aYYGfMucUM4wbwP6
Last year there was a similar incident in Allard: https://globalnews.ca/news/10650577/edmonton-allard-fatal-pedestrian-collision-charges-laid/
I get the need to design collector roads for street parking, emergency vehicles and busses, but surely there is a better way. This type of road design just reinforces unsafe and dangerous driving habits. In a residential area.
It's ridiculous that a new neighbourhood like Allard has already had street labs measures put in by the city like speed bumps, curb extensions, etc.. Our design standards should require these from the get-go. No more 14.5 metre wide collector roads, that is a ridiculous amount of distance to expect someone to cross on a road where everyone is speeding. My neighbourhood has one of these streets and I'd wager that less than 20% of vehicles will actually stop and let you cross.
I know this has been posted before.^
Can’t find it now, but there was another video on YouTube describing how non-grid neighbourhood layouts like this lead to more pedestrian injuries/deaths because the collector roads end up with high traffic volume and speeds. (Same situation in the Allard accident last year, also a truck.)
Very sad.
Also somewhat ridiculous that these new neighbourhoods aren’t built with traffic calming/safety measures already in place: curb extensions, pedestrian refuge island, raised crossings.
Not sure it that is happening now in current greenfield developments being built out?
I don't think it will be good enough, people speed inattentively down 118 all the time. My wife teaches at one of the schools in that area, and 2 years ago they had a parent and infant in stroller leaving parent teacher night get plowed into by a truck while they were in the flashing light pedestrian crossing. Thankfully they recovered from their injuries but it was horrible. Driver was never caught as far as I know.Sorry about the crazy URL
City news release about new safety initiative on 118Ave focusing on Highlands School.