News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.9K     0 
LINK trains down to single train service for a couple of weeks. From Pearson's IG and webpage

🚨Link Train Service Update

Scheduled maintenance on the Link Train is taking place on weekdays from May 4 –15 as part of planned work to support safe and reliable operations.

During this period:

Single‑train operation will be in effect, with service reduced from two trains to one train from 8 a.m. Monday until 5 p.m. Friday.
No Link Train service will operate overnight from 12:30 a.m. to 3:30 a.m., Tuesday through Friday during the maintenance period.

Edit: add link
 
Last edited:

Multibillion-dollar renovation project underway at Pearson airport. This is what’s being upgraded.​

- because I did not know what it meant --
https://www.globeair.com/g/high-speed-taxiway
What is a High-Speed Taxiway?.. A High-Speed Taxiway also referred to as a rapid exit taxiway,... strategically located and configured to accommodate aircraft exiting the runway at higher speeds than conventional taxiways, enhancing operational efficiency, runway capacity, and air traffic flow management ..
 
I flew to SFO about a month ago and noticed the plane exiting the runway quite quickly - must of been a high-speed exit taxiway. We were still moving significantly faster than typical taxi speed when we turned off the primary runway and continued to decelerate off the runway.

It likely shortens operating windows for movements and increases throughput on primary runways, increasing capacity.
 
I flew to SFO about a month ago and noticed the plane exiting the runway quite quickly - must of been a high-speed exit taxiway. We were still moving significantly faster than typical taxi speed when we turned off the primary runway and continued to decelerate off the runway.

It would have been, they added these in June '24 for runway 28 (both right and left)

It likely shortens operating windows for movements and increases throughput on primary runways, increasing capacity.

That is certainly the premise, though I understand that ongoing construction at SFO means the full operational impact may not yet have been established there.

Additionally, the FAA has prohibited side by side landings on the close proximity runways at SFO which has actually resulted in a reduction in arrival capacity, only partially offset by the exitways.
 
I flew to SFO about a month ago and noticed the plane exiting the runway quite quickly - must of been a high-speed exit taxiway. We were still moving significantly faster than typical taxi speed when we turned off the primary runway and continued to decelerate off the runway.

It likely shortens operating windows for movements and increases throughput on primary runways, increasing capacity.
The quicker an aircraft can exit the runway the quicker it can be opened up for another aircraft to land. So it increases the runway throughput by shortening the aircraft spacing for the runway.

Imagine having to slow an A380 down from 180+ knots down to 10 before you can get off the runway? You'd use the full length of the runway to slow down and block it from other aircraft landing. Whereas if it exits the runway earlier using a high speed exit then the runway can be used by another aircraft.

I believe YYZ has a few on the 06/24 pair
 
This ambitious schematic has enough space to make Pearson rival the biggest! Watch out Dubai!

IMG_3572.jpeg
 
This ambitious schematic has enough space to make Pearson rival the biggest! Watch out Dubai!

View attachment 736451

This diagram really shows how much room there is to expand passenger facilities at Pearson. I assume those yellow and burgundy cross hatched areas labelled "Other Airport Development with Passenger Terminal Facilities" are available for terminal expansion? Seems runway capacity is the major growth limiter at Pearson.
 
Seems runway capacity is the major growth limiter at Pearson.
As I understand it, Pearson doesn't have true triple takeoff/landing capability because 06L/24R and 06R/24L are too close together. Some expropriation would be needed to expand runway capacity. Maybe another runway closer to Derry road, north of 05/23, along with some O'Hare-lite reconfiguration.

1778775115806.png

 
As I understand it, Pearson doesn't have true triple takeoff/landing capability because 06L/24R and 06R/24L are too close together. Some expropriation would be needed to expand runway capacity. Maybe another runway closer to Derry road, north of 05/23, along with some O'Hare-lite reconfiguration.

View attachment 736582
I believe the ultimate plan (as it was stated when they built 6R/24L and added 15R/33L) was to pair 5/23 ( not 33... fat thumbs and work... My apologies) as you suggest. I believe the plan was south of the current 15/33, and that due to buildings at the east side it would only be able to be used as a 33 for take offs... It's been a while, though, and I don't have those plans
 
Last edited:
This ambitious schematic has enough space to make Pearson rival the biggest! Watch out Dubai!

View attachment 736451

This diagram really shows how much room there is to expand passenger facilities at Pearson. I assume those yellow and burgundy cross hatched areas labelled "Other Airport Development with Passenger Terminal Facilities" are available for terminal expansion? Seems runway capacity is the major growth limiter at Pearson.

Yellow are potential development lands. That I know of there was a plan for a North Deicing facility in the Northern part of the central yellow and red hatched area. The diagram also appears to be pre Infield Terminal since it also is located in the North part of the central area. Also shown is the planned twin of runway 05/23 and shows it South of the existing runway 05/23

More important are the lands outside the Airport grounds. The yellow surrounding 409 and the areas along Derry Rd. As these would be able to absorb other airport facilities to free up airport land for other uses. For example moving GTAA corporate offices from the South-East corner of the property.

As I understand it, Pearson doesn't have true triple takeoff/landing capability because 06L/24R and 06R/24L are too close together. Some expropriation would be needed to expand runway capacity. Maybe another runway closer to Derry road, north of 05/23, along with some O'Hare-lite reconfiguration.

View attachment 736582

I believe the ultimate plan (as it was stated when they built 6R/24L and added 15R/33L) was to pair 5/33 as you suggest. I believe the plan was south of the current 15/33, and that due to buildings at the east side it would only be able to be used as a 33 for take offs... It's been a while, though, and I don't have those plans

Runway 05R/23L would be south of the current runway 05/23 not north. It's shown in the slide above.

I believe the current constraint is passenger handling more that runway capacity. There has been a quick (in aviation terms) shift from smaller aircraft to larger higher capacity aircraft. So more passengers are being moved with the same or similar number of aircraft movements. Having been in YYZ a few times I can confirm that the passenger facilities are indeed to small to handle the number of passengers it sees. T1 international is absolutely rammed during the Evening European departure bank. There is not enough room around the gate waiting area to accommodate the 200-450 passengers waiting for any one flight given space being taken up by restaurants in what should be waiting areas (looking at you Fetta, Heirloom Bakery, Vinifera, and Marathi). This begins with building the Transborder pier, giving additional space and freeing up swing gates on the E pier for international flights.

My dream scenario for the International pier would be for Air Canada's Maple Leaf Lounge and Signature suite to move to the outer perimeter of the terminal (giving great plane spotting views), with direct connections to gates E74-E77. And moving restaurants like the above mentioned Fetta et al up to the third floor in a food court style area, this would free up space at the gate waiting areas and re distribute some passengers (first by allowing direct gate access from Maple Leaf Lounge and second by having people sitting and eating at the restaurant 'food court'

The difficulty is that the upper floor is used by arriving passengers to walk to the customs hall. I don't think that's an un surmountable obstacle but one I doubt GTAA would spend money on.
 
With all of this, I still don't think they are complying with contemporary Runway Safety Area standards and from the diagram, don't appear to be including it.
 

Back
Top