crs1026
Superstar
I’m not so bothered about the unfinished look as I am about the water seeping down the wall…
- Paul
- Paul
Eglinton Yonge remains the critical path portion of the project from my understanding, but even that is getting close.
The real question is if it can all be wrapped up in 3 months for project turnover to Metrolinx on September 21st... and I'm very doubtful. They haven't even poured the ground level slab at Yonge, yet alone built the entrance building or complete any station finishes.
I wouldn't be surprised if we see one more delay at this point, but not by a ton. Maybe another 3 months.
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
Given our experience with the TYSSE, I would be skeptical. I don’t know if it’s a design or maintenance failure, but a number of stations with exposed concrete have large water stains. It’s disappointing, because I’m generally ‘ok’ with the exposed-concrete look.Hopefully, the exposed concrete will be nicely finished here.
With our new underground LRT stations, we're seeing a lot of exposed concrete. It can make for an interesting contemporary design element or look cheap and trashy. When I see stains on the walls, patches, and unevenness from afar, it makes for a cheap and trashy impression. Hopefully, the exposed concrete will be nicely finished here.
Take a look at the concrete columns along the platforms on these new Warsaw Metro stations. Now that's some high-quality exposed concrete, down to the sleek and elegant sheen.
Yeah, and what's weird is the Sheppard subway stations don't have any water stains.Given our experience with the TYSSE, I would be skeptical. I don’t know if it’s a design or maintenance failure, but a number of stations with exposed concrete have large water stains. It’s disappointing, because I’m generally ‘ok’ with the exposed-concrete look.
Given our experience with the TYSSE, I would be skeptical. I don’t know if it’s a design or maintenance failure, but a number of stations with exposed concrete have large water stains. It’s disappointing, because I’m generally ‘ok’ with the exposed-concrete look.
Interestingly, in Warsaw what you see, for most part, is very selective use of exposed concrete as a finish, typically the columns; this is also tempered by a tendency for very bright colours/finishes through the balance of the station design.
As we've seen it used here, we typically get full exposed trackside walls, and often ceilings too, which is just too much overwhelming grey in the palate.
Its because we blow all the money to make 25 meter and 50 meter deep stations, instead for making shallower and architecturally good stations. Plus the city won't accept a shitty job, they'll tell the contractor to go back and fix it. The concrete used is also architectural will a finished polishOur approach seems to be marred by cheapness. Aside from bureaucratic stinginess, another problem is that there's a contingent of people (and possibly some of the bureaucrats themselves) that assumes that exposed concrete is, on its own, high design.
You still have to ensure that the concrete finishes are up to architectural standards. If there are going to be leaks that don't pose any structural failure risk, it's a better idea to choose a finish that won't show stains so obviously.




