News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.9K     0 
Kindly stop telling me what to do or think.

It doesn't give your opinion any more weight with me or anyone else.

You have a preference.

That's fine.

Its not mine; or that of many others.

Your aggressive tone is obnoxious and unwelcome.

I am simply asking you to look at what you propose. I am not being aggressive. If you want to ignore what repercussions your ideas have, that is up to you. It will not stop anyone from pointing them out.
 
I am simply asking you to look at what you propose. I am not being aggressive. If you want to ignore what repercussions your ideas have, that is up to you. It will not stop anyone from pointing them out.

Your opinion, unsupported by a shred of evidence, carries no weight with me.

I have no further interest in this discussion with you, nor any other discussion with you.
 
There's no trees and no room for any..................that's awful!

That will make the area very unappealing aesthetically and for walkers, it means no respite from the hot sun and no wind breaks.

I'm all for bike lanes, but those should have come at the expense of a lane of traffic, not streetscaping.

I agree.

But looking at recent street reconstructions such as Roncy, St Clair and Spadina, I'd say hold the dramatics for the final product. While each of these street rebuilds do leave something to be desired, trees always seem to be a priority. Also, the final configuration shown here is at an intersection with turning lanes which reduce the right of way. I would hope the mid block configuration can make up for the lack of trees at the intersection.

The street does looks hostile at the moment. Looking at the new configuration on Bloor, I have faith that city staff will pursue the same ideals here. If not, I'll be right behind you with my pitchfork.
 
Think the overall plan is NOT to create want-to-be expressways along the arterial roads. Though some politicians and residents (who don't live in the area) do.
 
In the context of completing a street that has been selected as a high volume transit corridor, which is about to attract the resulting densification, I will agree with you. Eglinton needs to become a "total avenue" - meaning it must be walkable, cyclable, traffic must be calmed, large vehicles must be diverted to some other path etc. The investment in a subway enables all this....so let's not waste the opportunity.

There is the problem however of ensuring that materiel and services have adequate and appropriate pathways into the city. No point in densifying and then having this denser community choking because deliveries have been forced off the traditional main avenues (Notice I didn't say "drivers" or "automobiles".... I'm thinking plumbers' vans, Purolator trucks, beer and food supply chain, goods for small retail stores, and construction materials and so forth. More density = more plumbers!)

Eglinton has traditionally been just such a pathway. It's the terminal pathway from the 401 in the West end, 400 at Black Creek, and the Spadina Expressway. Tied to the DVP.

If we de-roadway Eglinton, I believe that some other corridor has to pick up the slack. There will be winners and losers - if every avenue sacrifices its traffic lanes, we will have a city where nothing goes anywhere. Or, we will have a huge volume of late night deliveries. (The "thump" that woke you up was UPS dropping your Amazon purchase on your porch.....at 3AM....)

If we move necessary traffic off Eglinton - a necessity if we reduce lanes - where do we route them?

- Paul
The problem being Eglinton is one of the few routes that crosses the whole city. The next one north is Finch. We don't have a lot of alternative routes.
 
If only there was an underground electric railway under Bloor Street/Danforth Avenue.

You want cars and trucks to drive on the subway lines? They aren't streetcar lines....

How about this, double the property tax and base it off of real estate list prices. Use that money and build a world class transit system.
Or accept that there are some necessary evils within the city that will exist for the foreseeable future.
 
You want cars and trucks to drive on the subway lines? They aren't streetcar lines....

How about this, double the property tax and base it off of real estate list prices. Use that money and build a world class transit system.
Or accept that there are some necessary evils within the city that will exist for the foreseeable future.

You do know the definition of a "subway" is: "a railway system in which electric trains travel through tunnels below ground".

So both Line 2 (Bloor-Danforth) and Line 5 (Eglinton Crosstown) are "subways" as defined in the dictionary.
 
@Northern Light I can see how other forum dwellers might find some of your posts objectionable in terms of tone. I know I do sometimes. And this is not the first time I've seen you saying you're not interested in discussing something with someone after a small spat. Makes me wonder if the entire parade is marching out of step with Jonny. Which would be a shame because you're an insider in certain city building matters and your posts are often informative.
 

But will it be able to handle two-way GO Midtown service? Or will they have to return to redo the bridge at some later date?

go-midtown-map.png

From link.

See the GO Transit Midtown Corridor thread at this link.
 
Last edited:
^ If you look at Google Maps streetview at the location, you could get a sense on if the abutments would have to be expanded to add more truss structures. The existing bridge can only has two tracks.
 
^ If you look at Google Maps streetview at the location, you could get a sense on if the abutments would have to be expanded to add more truss structures. The existing bridge can only has two tracks.

Two tracks is plenty for GO Midtown line.

It would only happen if the Missing Link with CP happened anyways.
 
We've just put up a helluva story on the front page about how the underpinning of Line 1 was accomplished at Yonge and the Allen Road.


42
 

Back
Top