pdcstream
New Member
I thought they had planned to have the 54 Lawrence bus to go to Laird station before this.So it looks like Lawrence between Leslie and Don Mills will lose bus service. That doesn't seem like a great idea to me.
I thought they had planned to have the 54 Lawrence bus to go to Laird station before this.So it looks like Lawrence between Leslie and Don Mills will lose bus service. That doesn't seem like a great idea to me.
All this could've been avoided had they just had the foresight to build a proper side-of-roadway or elevated station at Leslie-Eglinton complete with a bus loop for the 51, 54 and 56. All this inconvenience for transit users for generations to come just to save like $100 million. Dumb!
All this could've been avoided had they just had the foresight to build a proper side-of-roadway or elevated station at Leslie-Eglinton complete with a bus loop for the 51, 54 and 56. All this inconvenience for transit users for generations to come just to save like $100 million. Dumb!
TTC planned number of trains for Lines 1 to 6.
From the 5 years plan: http://www.ttc.ca/About_the_TTC/Commission_reports_and_information/Commission_meetings/2019/December_12/Reports/Attachment 1 TTC_5_year_SP_web.pdf#page=47
View attachment 218527
TTC only plans to run 34 Flexity's as 2-car trains on opening day.
They'll likely be running trains at existing demand loads assuming that the freedoms actually have space for 250 passengers.I'm a little late getting to this discussion of Line 5 trains, but isn't the Flexity Freedom order from Bombardier (as reduced in 2018) for 76 cars? That would be 38 two-car trains; so why on earth is TTC talking about running 17 trains on opening day and ramping up to (only) 20 (2-car) trains by 2024? I understand they'll need to have spares but they'll be using less than half the cars they ordered!!!
Has the ridership projection changed massively (downward) from the planning a few years ago or has the Flexity Freedom order been reduced again and I was not aware?
What am I missing here? Something, somewhere doesn't add up.
I suspect they ordered more for a higher spare ratio and TTC fleet plans are only for paper reference only. They can change within months. We know TTC can't plan but plans can also change things quickly. We should all calm down for the 17 trains on opening day. As long as there are more LRVs available, I don't see why they can't increase it if ridership is sufficient.I'm a little late getting to this discussion of Line 5 trains, but isn't the Flexity Freedom order from Bombardier (as reduced in 2018) for 76 cars? That would be 38 two-car trains; so why on earth is TTC talking about running 17 trains on opening day and ramping up to (only) 20 (2-car) trains by 2024? I understand they'll need to have spares but they'll be using less than half the cars they ordered!!!
Has the ridership projection changed massively (downward) from the planning a few years ago or has the Flexity Freedom order been reduced again and I was not aware?
What am I missing here? Something, somewhere doesn't add up.
18 Caledonia makes a return.From Next Stop, Even Better 2020-2024 & Beyond at this link.
View attachment 219394
Why is the 14 GLENCAIRN bus not routed south on Caledonia to the CALEDONIA STATION? There does seem to be a "Castlefield/Roselawn" bus.
Nov 28
Lots more up on my site for the 3 stations and Mount Dennis area.
Getting ready to pour the curb for the westbound lane at the portal. Have pour some of the new sidewalk.
The OS support different from any I have seen for other systems. Doesn't look like much more to be done before going live and start testing the cars from Mount Dennis Station to X
Work well underway for the new GO/UPX Mount Dennis Station.
They are rebuilding a wider entrance/road to No Frills as well the new bus termin
![]()
The extra height actually serves a purpose. It gets used for lightning arrestors and mounting circuit breakers.Are they going to trim the height of the catenary poles? It looks so unrefined with so much extra length just sticking up there for no reason
As long as it's function, it's all good.Are they going to trim the height of the catenary poles? It looks so unrefined with so much extra length just sticking up there for no reason
I think we can say that they are not.Are they going to trim the height of the catenary poles? It looks so unrefined with so much extra length just sticking up there for no reason




