20250308_132939.jpg
20250308_133014.jpg
 
Yeah, north of Sullivan it's surprisingly squat.

As long as they're able to replicate the existing retail spaces, I have no qualms with redeveloping the unremarkable non-historic buildings along Spadina all the way up until College.

It's frustrating to see the fire damaged properties at the southwest corner of Spadina & Baldwin remain sitting so decrepit for what seems like 15+ years now.
 
As long as they're able to replicate the existing retail spaces, I have no qualms with redeveloping the unremarkable non-historic buildings along Spadina all the way up until College.

It's frustrating to see the fire damaged properties at the southwest corner of Spadina & Baldwin remain sitting so decrepit for what seems like 15+ years now.
I really wonder how stuff like that is possible. Presumably, the owner of the site has been paying high property taxes for all those years without any rental income. Make it make sense.
 
As long as they're able to replicate the existing retail spaces, I have no qualms with redeveloping the unremarkable non-historic buildings along Spadina all the way up until College.
Sincerely doubt they'll be able to. It's been a big sticking point for the local community and Friends of Chinatown.
 
Sincerely doubt they'll be able to. It's been a big sticking point for the local community and Friends of Chinatown.
If the rent is just too high, the answer is that the originals will not return. What I guess will happen is one or two new stores, with tons of empty "for lease" storefronts.
 
If the rent is just too high, the answer is that the originals will not return. What I guess will happen is one or two new stores, with tons of empty "for lease" storefronts.
One of the main originals was Rol San and they didn’t want to return as they were moving anyway (across the street).
Mike Layton worked hard on this issue to ensure the square footage of the retail units were kept low. The idea was to keep the granularity so there would be opportunities for small businesses rather than a single SDM-type tenant. I can’t access the planning documents right now to check, but I think there was a condition to reflect that.
 

Back
Top