[ProjectEnd]

Very anonymous design. Not a fan of the wall-o-glass at street level. 1329 Yonge handled the street level , material palette , and step backs so much better.

This highrise design has no relation to the neighborhood. It's the quality youd expect out by Neilson & Finch

Why spend time designing something not intended for construction?

 

[Northern Light]

Why spend time designing something not intended for construction?

Remember PE, most UT'ers don't know when its 'fake' until you tell them...........unless its Kingsett in which case people assume as much.

 

[ProjectEnd]

Damn! I was getting really geared up to give '1233y development lp' three quarters of a million dollars for 400 square feet!

Colour me depressed...

 

[GenerationLee]

Damn! I was getting really geared up to give '1233y development lp' three quarters of a million dollars for 400 square feet!

Colour me depressed...

Fine! Which gray should I colour you with? There's even shades covered on this site to imoress the likes of most paint enthusiasts.

 

[Tyrang]

Why spend time designing something not intended for construction?

I think Arcadis never really play favoritism on how much time they spend on any designs

 

[A Torontonian Now]

No construction, just a shot of the site at present, with development application sign, taken yesterday:

 

[Paclo]

Application Details

www.toronto.ca

Resubmission with the following stat changes:

• Storey count decreased from 53 to 48 (incl. full mezz level)
• Height decreased from 172.4 to 163.78m
• Total units decreased from 763 to 730
• Total vehicular parking decreased from 18 to 17
• Total bicycle parking decreased from 766 to 732

Additional revisions, via the cover letter:

Updated renderings:

 

[Northern Light]

Less bad, still not good.