70Challenger
Active Member
I appreciate that the existing structure is being integrated and just made to look nicer, as it's important to reduce material waste.
The look nicer part is debatable, but yeah, the reuse of the existing (base) building is laudable.I appreciate that the existing structure is being integrated and just made to look nicer, as it's important to reduce material waste.
Well I mean it is Peter St, the rest of the street is already a write off and soulessly depressing with pretty bad builds. There's nothing that can save it, so with that being said i've got no problem with this one.Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh...
Hi, does this mean this proposal will likely be approved as final decision? The TEYCC is the final step? Sorry I am not very familiar with this process…but I think the proposal itself doesn’t make sense at all, there are already four buildings nearby…….Decision Report - Approval Recommended, to the next meeting of TEYCC:
@interchange42 noted the floorplate issue........ they are actually 990m2, and the report allows them in full.
The closest separation distance is only 19M.......surprised that Susan signed off on that............more surprised Cary did.
From the report:
View attachment 638989
View attachment 638990
View attachment 638991
YesHi, does this mean this proposal will likely be approved as final decision? The TEYCC is the final step? Sorry I am not very familiar with this process…but I think the proposal itself doesn’t make sense at all, there are already four buildings nearby…….
Thanks!
Hi, does this mean this proposal will likely be approved as final decision?
The TEYCC is the final step?
Sorry I am not very familiar with this process…
but I think the proposal itself doesn’t make sense at all, there are already four buildings nearby…….
Thanks!
Capital are generally trustworthy. There's a good chance this will go ahead as rental in the short term. That said, Capital aren't the owners here, they're DMing on behalf of iA Financial who, end of day, are calling the shots.Yes, this is likely. Though, it could be deferred or amended at either TEYCC or at City Council.
No. City Council is the final step; assuming its approved there.
No worries, you learn by asking!
It doesn't make sense. LOL....... I'm not sure why Planning is agreeable.
I'm convinced this will be built. Its certainly possible...... but there are definite constructability issues given the surrounding context.
@ProjectEnd may have insight on that latter point.
Certainly, this doesn't feel like something that would be prioritized in the current market, to me.
Thank you so much, @Northern Light, actually city council just adopted today with one motion carried from TEYCC, though it’s preliminary decision for now.Yes, this is likely. Though, it could be deferred or amended at either TEYCC or at City Council.
No. City Council is the final step; assuming its approved there.
No worries, you learn by asking!
It doesn't make sense. LOL....... I'm not sure why Planning is agreeable.
I'm convinced this will be built. Its certainly possible...... but there are definite constructability issues given the surrounding context.
@ProjectEnd may have insight on that latter point.
Certainly, this doesn't feel like something that would be prioritized in the current market, to me.