Undead
Senior Member
It's not aftermarket. The vast majority of blinding headlights are stock from the manufacturers.
I know there are regulations regarding Lumens output but I'm not sure there are any regulations about colour temperature. So long as the manufacturers are compliant with regulations at the time of manufacture, I doubt there would be a legal foundation for a recall. The fact that regulations are weak is not the manufactuers' fault.I'd think the manufacturers are realising they are heading towards a recall - so should be keen to fix the problem.
I'm not sure why they can't change the colour as well - that's part of the problem I think.
Equipment violations are largely ignored now. Part of the problem is regulatory law is full of 'what-ifs', exceptions and 'ya-buts' that most cops simply give up. In addition, poorly crafted laws and/or a lack of enforcement technology renders a lot of enforcement completely subjective.Problem is the aftermarket world and its enforcement. Already there are drivers with illegal plate covers/placement, illegal illuminating/flashing lights (especially on motorcycles), heck even drivers driving around with high beams. Unless you're caught red-handed breaking a second law, I would imagine many get away with it.
I would guess there are many who do not understand the concept of properly projecting your lights when purchasing said aftermarket products: adjusting the beam so it does not blind drivers....in addition with products that don't make any mention of how to adjust...
It's good they are looking at it, but there will probably be years of uneasy driving until the old stuff phases out...
...
Either that or we're all getting older. Night driving is much different these days...
Edit: I forgot to add, the way we illuminate our roads has a play in this too... If it's raining + nighttime, good luck seeing the painted lines using an older style bulb... I have found many stretches on the 401 quite bad compared to other jurisdictions where reflectors/lighting are used...but again, maybe related to my age....
Oh, yes. I saw this on a trip to California about a year ago. It wasn't on every expressway, but one in particular had excellent reflectors of some kind on every single dashed lane marker and they were very bright late at night during a storm, also they were apparently unfazed by cars driving over them. On one downhill section of the highway you could see all the lanes marked out with the reflectors for a whole mile ahead.Edit: I forgot to add, the way we illuminate our roads has a play in this too... If it's raining + nighttime, good luck seeing the painted lines using an older style bulb... I have found many stretches on the 401 quite bad compared to other jurisdictions where reflectors/lighting are used...but again, maybe related to my age....
UK and other places have been using things like this for at least 60 years.Oh, yes. I saw this on a trip to California about a year ago. It wasn't on every expressway, but one in particular had excellent reflectors of some kind on every single dashed lane marker and they were very bright late at night during a storm, also they were apparently unfazed by cars driving over them. On one downhill section of the highway you could see all the lanes marked out with the reflectors for a whole mile ahead.
They had the same thing on multi-lane off-ramps also with very clear LED lighting indicators for which lane was for what at the end of the ramp.
They are used in a number of places, usually curves, that have proven to be problematic. They survive winter maintenance because they are cut in (recessed). One problem is cost when you consider roughly 17000 kilometers of provincial highways.Prior to the current construction, there were some very effective recessed cat's eyes on Trafalgar Road in Halton Hills, that guided drivers around corner at the Hornby Road junction. These seemed to survive regular winter plowing. I'd like to see them used more often.
MTO put cat eyes a few years back on HWY 6 near Freelton. They are indeed cutouts but they all grew into large potholes after a few years and now need to be filled in this coming construction season.They are used in a number of places, usually curves, that have proven to be problematic. They survive winter maintenance because they are cut in (recessed). One problem is cost when you consider roughly 17000 kilometers of provincial highways.
Interesting. The was a set on a curve near where we used to live and they seem to have survived fairly well.MTO put cat eyes a few years back on HWY 6 near Freelton. They are indeed cutouts but they all grew into large potholes after a few years and now need to be filled in this coming construction season.
wait, what? I need to check that out.I didn't see it mentioned earlier, but the rehab work on north side of the Niagara-bound Burlington skyway wrapped up a few weeks ago. With that done, the QEW is now 4 lanes from the freeman interchange all the way to Centennial, without the 3 lane pinchpoint at the Eastport/North Shore collector's. The collectors now rejoin with a 250m merge lane starting at the base of the skyway. This change should hopefully reduce the congestion due to weaving and merging just before the skyway.
I assume the future skyway rehab work will re-configure the Toronto-bound lanes to also maintain 4 through lanes over the skyway and the the way to the 403/407 interchange.
I did mean Niagara-bound. They were doing rehab work on the north side of that skyway span during the fall and wrapped up in December. I believe they are scheduled to do the south side of that span, and the Toronto-bound rehab work over the next year, so we may see reconfiguration of the Toronto-bound lanes at that point.wait, what? I need to check that out.
MTO's designs for the HOV expansion through the Freeman Interchange had that stupid pinch point remaining from their design a few years ago:
View attachment 623084
You can see one of the 4 lanes across the bridge continue to exit at North Shore, with the HOV lane opening directly beside it.. retaining the 3-lane "pinch point".
It always frustrated me because it caused a huge amount of congestion for little real reason - and *especially* frustrated me that MTO did not identify it's removal in it's widening EA. Going westbound on the Skyway is a significantly worse congestion level because of it, so it's very good news if MTO has actually fixed it.
Edit: wait - do you mean Niagara-bound? That's the south side of the bridge. not as helpful as eliminating the Toronto-bound pinch point, but it will still help.
I'm not sure whose jurisdiction they're under, but I find all new traffic lights in Mississauga, and most traffic lights in Mississauga in general, to have absolutely horrendous timing, as if they're specifically designed to stop you. I regularly just get a sea of red no matter what direction I go and no matter what time.I know it's still under construction but the new dixie off/on ramp configuration is horrible.
Going south on Dixie to the highway You've gone from 0 lights to 3!
Even better is that they are out of sync, so cars get stuck and the turn arrow is usually wasted
I'm quoting someone else from a while ago talking about highway 7 but apparently the explanation they got was that constant greens leads to more speeding, though I feel like they totally ignored how hitting every single red will make people more aggressive in turn.I'm not sure whose jurisdiction they're under, but I find all new traffic lights in Mississauga, and most traffic lights in Mississauga in general, to have absolutely horrendous timing, as if they're specifically designed to stop you. I regularly just get a sea of red no matter what direction I go and no matter what time.