News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6K     0 

Looks like they don't want us to see this...


View attachment 689970
Probably because it's owned by the National Parks, has a historical designation, and any such renovations/changes are to be approved by a committee that Trump hasn't bothered to appoint anyone to.

You can guess if any of the above have been taken into account.

No. The answer is no.
 
Probably because it's owned by the National Parks, has a historical designation, and any such renovations/changes are to be approved by a committee that Trump hasn't bothered to appoint anyone to.

You can guess if any of the above have been taken into account.

No. The answer is no.

Well, the Sun King need his Hall of Mirrors.

AoD
 
Probably because it's owned by the National Parks, has a historical designation, and any such renovations/changes are to be approved by a committee that Trump hasn't bothered to appoint anyone to.

You can guess if any of the above have been taken into account.

No. The answer is no.
Alt National Park Service addressed this on their Facebook Group today and posted the following: (https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BdmvH7p2M/)

We’ve received a lot of questions about Trump’s demolition of the White House East Wing.
Here’s how the process is supposed to work:
1. Initial Proposal: The White House is managed by the National Park Service (NPS) but used by the Executive Office of the President (EOP). Any proposed change, even by a sitting president, begins internally through the Office of the Curator and the White House Facilities Management Division.
2. Historic Review: The NPS, as custodian of the White House under the Presidential Residence Act and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), must review all alterations for compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA. This requires assessing potential impacts on historic and cultural resources in consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) and the D.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
3. Planning & Environmental Oversight: The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) evaluates all major federal projects in the National Capital Region, including work on the White House grounds, for design, planning, and environmental impacts under NEPA (the National Environmental Policy Act). Public comment and design reviews are part of that process.
4. Aesthetic Review: The U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) reviews and advises on the design and appearance of any exterior modifications to the White House or its grounds.
5. Final Authorization: After approvals from NPS, NCPC, and CFA, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the White House Chief Usher / Facilities Management Office finalize funding, scheduling, and logistics.
Only after completing this full process could any major construction or demolition legally begin.
Yet Trump ignored every step, acting unilaterally through executive order, bypassing oversight, and ordering demolition as if he were a monarch. The result: the people’s house, altered without the people’s consent.
More details:
Section 107, let’s talk about it.
The above process has always been the process taken, and here’s why.
Section 107 of the National Historic Preservation Act exempts the White House, the U.S. Capitol, and the Supreme Court from being legally required to go through the Act’s formal Section 106 review. In other words, the law doesn’t automatically force those branches to follow the same procedures as other federal buildings. That exemption exists only because each branch of government controls its own seat of power, it was never intended as a free pass to ignore preservation, planning, or environmental rules altogether.
In practice, every administration since the 1960s has followed the same review structure out of duty, accountability, and executive-branch policy. The White House is still federal property, managed by the National Park Service under the Presidential Residence Act and subject to Executive Order 11593, which requires federal agencies to protect and consult on historic resources. Major exterior or site work still triggers National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) and U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) design reviews, along with NEPA environmental assessments. Any project involving government resources must also comply with the Anti-Deficiency Act and federal ethics rules on funding and gifts.
So yes, Section 107 means the NHPA can’t force compliance, but presidents are still bound by a network of executive orders, planning statutes, environmental laws, and constitutional duties. That’s why the process described isn’t optional, it’s the framework that has always protected the people’s house from unilateral or politically motivated alteration.
These executive orders:
- Executive Order 11593 (1971) – Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment - Requires all federal agencies (including the Executive Office of the President) to “locate, inventory, and nominate to the National Register all properties under their control” and to consult with the Secretary of the Interior before altering historically significant structures. (Demolishing part of the White House without such consultation would conflict with this order.)
- Executive Order 12148 (1979), delegates emergency and historic property responsibilities to the Department of the Interior, reaffirming that federal agencies must protect historic resources even when exemptions exist.
 
I mean, wtf?

 
It's a pretty good summation of the American Century of Humiliation
The 21st century will belong to whichever major power ends the self-inflicted catastrophes first. Welcome back to the era of "personality*"-driven politics.

*I use this term generously to describe Trump, Xi, Putin, etc.
 
The 21st century will belong to whichever major power ends the self-inflicted catastrophes first. Welcome back to the era of "personality*"-driven politics.

*I use this term generously to describe Trump, Xi, Putin, etc.
I think it's pretty commonly accepted that we're in the Chinese century, for people who subscribe to this sort of thing.
 

Trump Said to Demand Justice Dept. Pay Him $230 Million for Past Cases​


President Trump is demanding that the Justice Department pay him about $230 million in compensation for the federal investigations into him, according to people familiar with the matter, who added that any settlement might ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him or those in his orbit.
The situation has no parallel in American history, as Mr. Trump, a presidential candidate, was pursued by federal law enforcement and eventually won the election, taking over the very government that must now review his claims. It is also the starkest example yet of potential ethical conflicts created by installing the president’s former lawyers atop the Justice Department.
Mr. Trump submitted complaints through an administrative claim process that often is the precursor to lawsuits. The first claim, lodged in late 2023, seeks damages for a number of purported violations of his rights, including the F.B.I. and special counsel investigation into Russian election tampering and possible connections to the 2016 Trump campaign, according to people familiar with the matter. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because the claim has not been made public.
The second complaint, filed in the summer of 2024, accuses the F.B.I. of violating Mr. Trump’s privacy by searching Mar-a-Lago, his club and residence in Florida, in 2022 for classified documents. It also accuses the Justice Department of malicious prosecution in charging him with mishandling sensitive records after he left office.




 

Trump Said to Demand Justice Dept. Pay Him $230 Million for Past Cases​


President Trump is demanding that the Justice Department pay him about $230 million in compensation for the federal investigations into him, according to people familiar with the matter, who added that any settlement might ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him or those in his orbit.
The situation has no parallel in American history, as Mr. Trump, a presidential candidate, was pursued by federal law enforcement and eventually won the election, taking over the very government that must now review his claims. It is also the starkest example yet of potential ethical conflicts created by installing the president’s former lawyers atop the Justice Department.
Mr. Trump submitted complaints through an administrative claim process that often is the precursor to lawsuits. The first claim, lodged in late 2023, seeks damages for a number of purported violations of his rights, including the F.B.I. and special counsel investigation into Russian election tampering and possible connections to the 2016 Trump campaign, according to people familiar with the matter. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because the claim has not been made public.
The second complaint, filed in the summer of 2024, accuses the F.B.I. of violating Mr. Trump’s privacy by searching Mar-a-Lago, his club and residence in Florida, in 2022 for classified documents. It also accuses the Justice Department of malicious prosecution in charging him with mishandling sensitive records after he left office.




That should just about pay for his Whitehouse ballroom complete with gilded throne.
 
That should just about pay for his Whitehouse ballroom complete with gilded throne.
If Trump ever gets $250 million from his DOJ, and he very well may, Trump will pocket the quarter BILLION instead of directing it to his 90,000 sq/ft White House banquet hall/event space (TWICE the size of the White House) being built from bribes. Trump's former personal lawyer, Todd Blanche, gets to decide this. The same Todd Blanche who sent convicted child-sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum security "Club Fed" as she awaits a Trump pardon, which will come after the midterms if not before.

BTW, how long before Trump renames the "DOJ" Department of Justice the "DOI" Department of Injustice, just like he renamed the "DOD" Department of Defense "DOW" Department of War.
 
Ethics never come into play for those who seek retribution, perceived, imagined or otherwise...
 

Back
Top