News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6K     0 

The Ford gov't out today with a presser that they have approved fast tracking a Lithium mining project in the north of the province.

I'd be interested to hear from those with more knowledge and insight into the critical minerals sector, lithium and battery tech whether they feel the fanfare in the release is justified:


I'd also be curious to hear the take of others on sodium-ion battery development and where that will leave lithium ion batteries in perhaps a decade's time.
 
The Ford gov't out today with a presser that they have approved fast tracking a Lithium mining project in the north of the province.

I'd be interested to hear from those with more knowledge and insight into the critical minerals sector, lithium and battery tech whether they feel the fanfare in the release is justified:


I'd also be curious to hear the take of others on sodium-ion battery development and where that will leave lithium ion batteries in perhaps a decade's time.
This channel does some high quality explainers on several topics, including battery technology.

Sodium ion will play a role, but it won't displace lithium ion. The market for batteries is going to grow rapidly, and lithium will still be needed.


This mine and processing plant will produce lithium carbonate, which is a precursor for cathode production. There was a plan to build a cathode plant near Kingston (Umicore), but construction was halted last year due to uncertainty in global demand for EV batteries. Other than that, I'm not aware of any big consumers of lithium carbonate planned in Ontario.

 
This. And if he tried to extend past the Section 4 limit of five years, that would be where the reserve power of the Crown would come in since the government would no longer be legitimate. It would be a Constitutional crisis for sure.

Of course, he could always try to pull a Trump and try make creative use of the concepts of 'war', 'invasion' or 'insurrection' as allowed in 4(2).

Or change the definition of a year /s.

AoD
 
This. And if he tried to extend past the Section 4 limit of five years, that would be where the reserve power of the Crown would come in since the government would no longer be legitimate. It would be a Constitutional crisis for sure.

Of course, he could always try to pull a Trump and try make creative use of the concepts of 'war', 'invasion' or 'insurrection' as allowed in 4(2).
...don't give him any weird ideas. He's bad enough as he is. >.<
 
Ford Government announces feasibility into a new east-west pipeline taking oil and gas from Western Canada to a future port in James Bay.
1761880660034.png

The Ford government says it is pushing ahead with a multi-province feasibility study into a new east-west pipeline, an idea initially floated through the summer as a way to insulate the Canadian economy.
On Thursday, Ontario announced it was officially moving ahead with a feasibility study looking at an east-west energy corridor to take oil and gas from Alberta and Saskatchewan to an as-yet unbuilt port in James Bay.

“This nation-building pipeline and energy corridor will unite our country and help unlock new markets for Canada’s energy resources that will reduce our dependence on the United States, all while creating new jobs and opportunities for Canadian workers from coast to coast to coast,” Ontario Premier Doug Ford said in a statement.
The Ford government said the feasibility study, which does not yet have a price tag, would conclude next year.
https://globalnews.ca/news/11502854/ontario-alberta-pipeline-feasibility-study/
 
A port on James Bay is pretty wild. There is very little infrastructure there. No road to Moosonee, only a village of a couple thousand people.
 
Ford Government announces feasibility into a new east-west pipeline taking oil and gas from Western Canada to a future port in James Bay.
View attachment 692263


https://globalnews.ca/news/11502854/ontario-alberta-pipeline-feasibility-study/
I am all for building new pipelines from west to east, but building a pipeline to a port in James Bay makes ZERO SENSE, construction logistics aside. If we want to move our energy to Europe or eastern Canada via Hudson Bay, it makes much more sense to transport this energy through the port of Churchill, Manitoba, which is much closer to the energy-producing areas of Alberta and Saskatchewan than James Bay is. I would estimate the pipeline to Churchill would be at least a thousand miles shorter than to a port in James Bay, and remember, a lot of this is through the Canadian shield, which is costly. There is NO business case for an energy terminal in James Bay.

Given the short shipping season in Hudson Bay, it only makes sense to transport LNG since Europe stocks up on LNG in the summer when the Hudson Bay shipping season is open. LNG shipments to Europe have a somewhat limited shipping season, just like wheat, which we have shipped through the port of Churchill. Oil is a different matter, and it makes no sense trying to ship oil through the port of Churchill or somewhere in James Bay. Doug Ford is not very smart, and he is being advised by idiots.

When Carney announced his "Nation Building" projects, at the very TOP of his list should have been an ENERGY EAST PIPELINE. Canada imports half a million barrels a day of oil from the US to supply refineries in the east that are directly cut off from Canadian oil. At current oil prices, that is $30 million A DAY going to buy American oil, OR about $11 BILLION a year on American oil that we could have supplied eastern provinces with oil from Alberta and Saskatchewan. DOES THIS MAKE ANY SENSE?

As if this isn't bad enough, Alberta oil that supplies the refineries in Sarnia flows through Enbridge Line 5, which runs from Superior, Wisconsin, through Michigan’s Upper and Lower Peninsulas, and into Sarnia, Ontario. The Americans could easily shut off the supply of our OWN OIL by turning off the tap on Line 5, and Donald Trump would not hesitate. Why have our "leaders" left us in such a vulnerable position?

When Carney was sworn in, his first order of business should have been to build an ALL-CANADIAN pipeline from west to east. Not only to supply refineries in the east while avoiding Line 5, but also to supply oil to Europe while drastically reducing flows of oil to the United States.

Mark Carney likes to say, “We can give ourselves far more than Donald Trump can ever take away.” Yes, we can, Mark, starting with building a west-east pipeline that will free eastern Canada from dependence on American oil, that will free us from Donald Trump shutting off Canada from our own oil by closing the Line 5 tap. This is a MASSIVE NATIONAL SECURITY RISK. This is a no-brainer. I don't know if Mark Carney is an idiot or if he is compromised in some way, but since getting sworn in as PM, he has done NOTHING to secure the future of Canada.
 
A port on James Bay is pretty wild. There is very little infrastructure there. No road to Moosonee, only a village of a couple thousand people.
Not only that, Moosonee is about 20 kilks from James Bay. The river delta as well as the adjacent southern part of James Bay is very shallow. That lower part of the river and delta is a constantly shifting series of channels and sandbars.

Churchill is already a deep water port.

Only in terms of Ontario, I've often wondered about the promotion of an 'east-west energy corridor'. We already the Trans-Canada Pipeline corridor. Maybe it would need to be widened but it does already exist. Electricity? Maybe, but it's not like we're exporting it offshore. Rail (for moving petroleum)? the railways seem happy with what they have.

Terrain requirements for each are completely different.
 
Another day, another 'scandal'...

SEE: https://www.cp24.com/politics/queen...colleges-that-got-millions-in-grants-records/

The wife of Ontario’s labour minister registered to lobby for an advocacy group for career colleges, and two of its members received millions from a government fund overseen by the minister, according to lobbyist registry records.

The filings say Faith Chipman never registered to directly lobby her husband, Labour Minister David Piccini, to access the province’s controversial $2.5 billion Skills Development Fund.

But one of her stated goals in lobbying a variety of other ministries does match the training programs that the colleges received funding for—prompting Ontario’s opposition leader to cry foul.


“Once again, it’s the friends and family special with this minister, and in this government, there’s one set of rules for everybody else, but others for their friends, family members, donors or insiders,” said the NDP’s Marit Stiles in an interview.

Piccini told reporters in Queen’s Park late Wednesday afternoon that he had engaged the legislature’s ethics watchdog to place an ethics screen to ensure that he was not dealing directly with his wife’s work.

“We work with the Integrity Commissioner, and I take that very seriously,” Piccini said
 
Only in terms of Ontario, I've often wondered about the promotion of an 'east-west energy corridor'. We already the Trans-Canada Pipeline corridor. Maybe it would need to be widened but it does already exist. Electricity? Maybe, but it's not like we're exporting it offshore. Rail (for moving petroleum)? the railways seem happy with what they have.

Terrain requirements for each are completely different.
The Trans-Canada Pipeline is a natural gas pipeline. It is almost as old as I am, 67. Getting natural gas across Canada is not the problem. What is the problem is getting Canadian oil from Alberta to eastern Canada and further to Europe and the rest of the world.

What should ALARM everyone is that we rely on pipelines going through Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan to get Western Canadian oil to refineries in Sarnia!
Donald Trump could shut off eastern Canada from our OWN Canadian oil by closing the Line 5 pipeline. Does anyone else think that this is a dire risk to Canada? Carney seems to be unconcerned. Either he is stupid or complicit (or both). Carney moved Brookfield's HQ to New York, so I don't think his allegiance is to Canada.
 
Lets take a closer look at the words used in the opening paragraph of the News Release:

1761918899500.png


- Feasibility Study. (Not an EA, not a real proposal, not a tender to build)

- Explore the benefits of... (not make a determination as to any particular project or its ultimate form)

- I would read the last part as follows.

To new and established refineries in southern Ontario And/OR New ports on any or all of James Bay, Hudson's Bay or the Great Lakes.

I don't think one should seriously read in the idea that there is anything like a concrete proposal for a James Bay deep water port at this point, or a new Hudson's Bay one in Ontario.

Its just written as Blue Sky we'll consider all the options which allows them to say they considered everyone's interests and concerns when they ultimately approve (or not) a final choice or choices.
 
Here is Doug's guest opinion in today's Washington Post. Currently not behind pay wall but... https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...d-ontario-premier-tariffs-trump-world-series/

Opinion

Doug Ford: Canada and the Toronto Blue Jays are global heavyweights​

Our relationship with the U.S. is being tested by tariffs, but our country is more united than ever.

By Doug Ford
Doug Ford is the premier of Ontario.

For the first time in more than three decades, the Toronto Blue Jays are competing for the World Series — and the timing couldn’t be better.

Canada and the United States are neighbors, allies and best friends. We have stood shoulder to shoulder on the battlefield, defending shared values of freedom and democracy. Free trade between our two countries has ushered in decades of unprecedented wealth and prosperity, creating millions of jobs on both sides of the border.

U.S. tariffs on Canada’s economy have tested this long-standing partnership.

In response, Canadians have united in a way I’ve never seen. Patriotism is surging north of the border in big and small ways, from choosing Canadian-made products on grocery store shelves to making no apology about cheering on the home team. In February, Canadians united to cheer Team Canada to a hard-fought win over Team USA in the 4 Nations Face-Off hockey tournament. Now, the country is united again to cheer on Canada’s Team — this time the Blue Jays, all the way to a World Series title.

On ESPN, on Fox Sports and every other network throughout the playoffs, fans and pundits alike have described matchups between the Blue Jays and American teams as “David versus Goliath.” Each time, the Jays have come out swinging, first toppling the Yankees and the Mariners and now winning three of the first five games in the World Series against the Los Angeles Dodgers.
Americans are underestimating the Jays. After all, Canada’s team isn’t some small-market afterthought. The Jays play for the fourth largest metropolitan area in North America and a proud nation of more than 41 million people. With two of the highest payrolls in the league, a Blue Jays versus Dodgers fight is less David versus Goliath and more a heavyweight bout.

Like our team, Canada can boast about being a global heavyweight, too.

We’re an energy superpower, with the oil, gas and electricity needed to power America’s economic growth, including from Ontario’s growing fleet of nuclear power plants and the first small modular nuclear reactors in the G-7. Canada has some of the largest deposits of critical minerals in the world in the Ring of Fire — including the rare earth minerals needed for advanced manufacturing, medical technologies, modern defense systems and equipment and everyday essentials like mobile phones. We have uranium, potash, high-grade nickel, steel, aluminum and some of the best lumber in the world for building homes.

We’re America’s No. 1 customer, buying more America-made cars than any other country on earth. In 2023, Ontario on its own was the largest trading partner for 17 states and second largest for another 11.
From coast to coast to coast, Canada’s unity is extending to its provincial and territorial governments. In the past eight months, Ontario has signed internal free trade agreements with 10 provinces and territories to grow Canada’s economy by up to $200 billion. Canadian governments are working together to build the pipelines, ports, rail lines, transmission lines and other infrastructure that will unlock new trade routes. We’re onshoring manufacturing jobs and using Canadian products wherever we can to build a stronger, more united country.
Canada stands proud on the world stage. The Jays will, too, when they bring it home and win the World Series.

Let’s go Blue Jays!
 
Lets take a closer look at the words used in the opening paragraph of the News Release:

View attachment 692336

- Feasibility Study. (Not an EA, not a real proposal, not a tender to build)

- Explore the benefits of... (not make a determination as to any particular project or its ultimate form)

- I would read the last part as follows.

To new and established refineries in southern Ontario And/OR New ports on any or all of James Bay, Hudson's Bay or the Great Lakes.

I don't think one should seriously read in the idea that there is anything like a concrete proposal for a James Bay deep water port at this point, or a new Hudson's Bay one in Ontario.

Its just written as Blue Sky we'll consider all the options which allows them to say they considered everyone's interests and concerns when they ultimately approve (or not) a final choice or choices.
I agree. I suspect history will find the study sitting on the same shelf as the one for the 401 tunnel.

If the intent is export, expecting international customers and shippers to use a Seaway Max fleet seems rather inefficient.
 
Donald Trump could shut off eastern Canada from our OWN Canadian oil by closing the Line 5 pipeline. Does anyone else think that this is a dire risk to Canada? Carney seems to be unconcerned. Either he is stupid or complicit (or both). Carney moved Brookfield's HQ to New York, so I don't think his allegiance is to Canada.
When you have a vulnerability that is not easily or quickly addressed, you should not call undue attention to it. Such a tit-for-tat could escalate in other ways. Does the US want to continue to use the Seaway? Or maybe Canada needs to conduct lengthy inspections of vessels carrying American cargo before they can pass through those waterways.

From a domestic security standpoint, there is an argument to be made for not relying (solely) on pipelines that pass through the US. However, if the US were escalating to the point of cutting off our energy supply, what's to say they wouldn't use kinetic means to cut our pipelines and critical infrastructure. There is next to nothing we could do to stop them, such a strike could be done in hours. Where such an attack would go is unclear, occupying Canada would be untenable. If they couldn't hold Iraq or Afghanistan, I don't think they could hold Canada.
 

Back
Top