News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
A Message to Our Readers
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
EarthCam Time-Lapse Documents Rafael Viñoly-Designed New Stanford Hospital Construction
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
Resort Town
 6K     0 

This is something I'm not suprised about, but still outraged. The political meddling with Ontario Place and the Science Centre is becoming quite a show, and not a beneficial one for Torontonians.
I haven't been to the Science Centre in years, but thoroughly enjoyed every visit there. I was hoping to visit sometime soon, but that won't be happening it seems. It's a shame because it's a much beloved, well designed institution in the city, whereas this relocation feels forced and messy. (which it is)
 
As I bring some materials in, I'm going to flag @Paclo and @interchange42 as I think this Science Centre discussion may benefit from being segregated from the OP thread, I will leave that to their wisdom.

In the meantime, here's the press release:

Ontario Newsroom

news.ontario.ca news.ontario.ca

And here is a direct link to the Engineering Report on the OSC roof:

Buildings A-C:


I will read the report when I have time and comment further then, if I have something to add.
 
Northern Light said:
As I bring some materials in, I'm going to flag @Paclo and @interchange42 as I think this Science Centre discussion may benefit from being segregated from the OP thread, I will leave that to their wisdom.

In the meantime, here's the press release:

Ontario Newsroom

news.ontario.ca news.ontario.ca

And here is a direct link to the Engineering Report on the OSC roof:

Buildings A-C:


I will read the report when I have time and comment further then, if I have something to add.
Click to expand...
from the news release:

To ensure families, students and youth can continue to access and benefit from science-based programming and education, Infrastructure Ontario will be releasing a Request for Proposals to help identify a temporary location for the Ontario Science Centre, while work continues to build a new permanent home for the Science Centre at Ontario Place with an opening slated for as early as 2028. The Ontario Science Centre is also exploring opportunities for alternative programming, such as mobile, pop-up experiences and virtual.
Click to expand...

LMFAO why not just make that temporary place permanent?
 
Northern Light said:
As I bring some materials in, I'm going to flag @Paclo and @interchange42 as I think this Science Centre discussion may benefit from being segregated from the OP thread, I will leave that to their wisdom.

In the meantime, here's the press release:

Ontario Newsroom

news.ontario.ca news.ontario.ca

And here is a direct link to the Engineering Report on the OSC roof:

Buildings A-C:


I will read the report when I have time and comment further then, if I have something to add.
Click to expand...
Am I reading this correctly that for ~25MM over a few years (understanding these are only parts and labour costs) to be fixed by Oct 31 we could keep going?

They are estimating roughly 5-6 percent of the roof across all three buildings are critical/high risk?

Doesn't immediately sound like we have to shutter it completely?

Obviously there is lost revenue, but looking for another temporary location for several years is going to cost?? Curious.
 
Coolibop said:
Am I reading this correctly that for ~25MM over a few years (understanding these are only parts and labour costs) to be fixed by Oct 31 we could keep going?

They are estimating roughly 5-6 percent of the roof across all three buildings are critical/high risk?

Doesn't immediately sound like we have to shutter it completely?

Obviously there is lost revenue, but looking for another temporary location for several years is going to cost less to? Curious.
Click to expand...
Yea those numbers are not big at all. doesnt look right. That report reads as "well we tried we cant save it"
The engineers only say that repairs must be done by October 31. Even a few months shutdown to keep it alive would be possible.
cant say im suprised knowing ford
 
The Ontario Science Centre is also exploring opportunities for alternative programming, such as mobile, pop-up experiences and virtual.
Click to expand...
If they were still planning to have guest speakers and presentations,
https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threads/space-exploration-news.30608/post-2007829
maybe something could be worked out to occasionally use some of the smaller performing arts centres in the GTA?
The North York one has four theatres of different sizes, and an art gallery type of exhibit space.

TOLive Portal

tolive.com tolive.com
Some of those buildings at Exhibition Place don't seem to get used much outside of the CNE, although I don't think they're intended to be used in the winter.
 
Last edited:
Give it the spectacular home it deserves at the foot of Yonge.

Zaha Hadid Architects agreed to tweak their Chengdu science (fiction) museum for T-Dot. This one would float rather than lake infill. 🙃

09204022-2_cover_1371x1144.jpg

Zaha Hadid Architects
 
A lot of people are offering the hackneyed "condos" alibi for what's being done here (which doesn't make sense as it's conservation land and hence off-limits)--I think this is more of an "owning" gesture on Doug's part. He knows there's all those namby-pamby Brutalist hysterical types wanting to save the place and eager to clamp down the designation; and he knows that any such gesture's likely to pass at City Council. But he also knows that most people don't give two hoots about who Raymond Moriyama is; the thing is, the place is old, it's falling apart, it's "dated", and that's all that matters.

So condemn it and close it, on a note of "that's it, no more". And you can be sure that he'll try to get the wreckers in there as soon as possible, in the name of "Doug Ford gets things done"; and nyaah nyaah, hysterical preservationists, you can't do nuttin', the place is gone...
 
Coolibop said:
Doesn't immediately sound like we have to shutter it completely?
Click to expand...
True, but it's a government building, if part of the roof did suddenly collapse, someone was injured/killed, and it was found they knew about the condition of the roof and had kept the building open, it would be a massive scandal. Simplest reason why it was immediately closed, avoiding any potential risk/liability. Almost certainly an NDP or Liberal government would also have announced at least a temporary closure based on this report. It also sounds like the repairs require the facility to be vacant (again probably for safety reasons) for work to occur, which is why it wasn't just certain parts of the building that were shut.

Now if it was the NDP or Liberals I'd assume they'd try and fix the roof, but I'm much less convinced of that with this government unfortunately.
 
TossYourJacket said:
True, but it's a government building, if part of the roof did suddenly collapse, someone was injured/killed, and it was found they knew about the condition of the roof and had kept the building open, it would be a massive scandal. Simplest reason why it was immediately closed, avoiding any potential risk/liability. Almost certainly an NDP or Liberal government would also have announced at least a temporary closure based on this report. It also sounds like the repairs require the facility to be vacant (again probably for safety reasons) for work to occur, which is why it wasn't just certain parts of the building that were shut.

Now if it was the NDP or Liberals I'd assume they'd try and fix the roof, but I'm much less convinced of that with this government unfortunately.
Click to expand...
I think anyone would close it if they found out. The problem is that the conservatives have been in charge for a few years now. Why hasn’t it had the maintenance it needed.
 
adma said:
A lot of people are offering the hackneyed "condos" alibi for what's being done here (which doesn't make sense as it's conservation land and hence off-limits)--I think this is more of an "owning" gesture on Doug's part. He knows there's all those namby-pamby Brutalist hysterical types wanting to save the place and eager to clamp down the designation; and he knows that any such gesture's likely to pass at City Council. But he also knows that most people don't give two hoots about who Raymond Moriyama is; the thing is, the place is old, it's falling apart, it's "dated", and that's all that matters.

So condemn it and close it, on a note of "that's it, no more". And you can be sure that he'll try to get the wreckers in there as soon as possible, in the name of "Doug Ford gets things done"; and nyaah nyaah, hysterical preservationists, you can't do nuttin', the place is gone...
Click to expand...
While id agree for the most part, the only thing id take exception with would be the idea that he wants to demolish it.

I think he wouldnt care what happens to it, just that the science center as we know it moves to Ontario Place. Hes said in the past "i dont care what gets built there, condos schools, more museums by the city."
Condos, museums, parks, he doesnt care, not his problem anymore.
 
TossYourJacket said:
True, but it's a government building, if part of the roof did suddenly collapse, someone was injured/killed, and it was found they knew about the condition of the roof and had kept the building open, it would be a massive scandal. Simplest reason why it was immediately closed, avoiding any potential risk/liability. Almost certainly an NDP or Liberal government would also have announced at least a temporary closure based on this report. It also sounds like the repairs require the facility to be vacant (again probably for safety reasons) for work to occur, which is why it wasn't just certain parts of the building that were shut.

Now if it was the NDP or Liberals I'd assume they'd try and fix the roof, but I'm much less convinced of that with this government unfortunately.
Click to expand...
sixrings said:
I think anyone would close it if they found out. The problem is that the conservatives have been in charge for a few years now. Why hasn’t it had the maintenance it needed.
Click to expand...

I did link directly to the Engineering Report.

It clearly states they do not envision any serious risk to the public prior to October 31st. The magic of that date, by the way, is the slight, but real risk of snow, and therefore snow load on some sections of roof.

However, when one looks at the report, it's only a very small portion of the roof system that is of high/critical concern, something in the range of 5-7% of the overall complex. The report does not suggest closing the building it suggests rehabbing the affected sections of roof and placing construction-grade hoarding around affected zones.

The 1-year out cost of essential repairs through the end of 2024 is just over 7M.

****

Don't just read lazy media script, read the underlying documents.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top