News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6K     0 

We know the plan to move was brought up some years before the announcement. It is also entirely possible they knew the future of the building and decided not to do work. But again why keep it quiet at this junction is puzzling.
Probably because they don't want the public to think that they purposely left the bridge to rot.
 
Another crazy idea! Lol

IMG_5596.png
 
Not even sure where to put this but it is being discussed there

the Science Centre is closing for good today after a report was published about the roof being close to collapsing


Screenshot_20240621_123944.jpg

Screenshot_20240621_124005.jpg


Presumably this increases the 1.3 billion to stay put (vs just over 1)...the over 50 years thing makes it seem like a bigger deal, also considering the new location is half the size.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Relevant

 
the Science Centre is closing for good today
I don't think we know yet if this is a permanent closure.

With the new location being ready in '28, I wonder how this affects the move. Do we speed up (the move) or, we're going to spend money on a temporary fix just to demolish in 4 years, or just have no science centre for 4 years? I imagine some would argue if we're going to spend money on the building, then might as well stay put, but I'm sure that ship has sailed...
 

Back
Top