News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

He knows, he just has no interest in letting the truth get in the way of politicking and grandstanding.
This is ridiculous, but I really don't see the point of council meeting and voting on things at this point, with an election in a month or so.

Everything becomes political and any decisions that the incoming council does like will probably be changed. Time to wrap this sh*t up.
 
IMG_0402.jpeg


How do you cut taxes by 22% while increasing the police budget? (The largest item in the City’s budget.)

It makes no sense.

I listened to Omar Mohammad on Jespersen today. He was saying 98-99% of people in Edmonton get around by car. Obviously wrong.

He wants to limit mid block infill to 6 units (fair enough) but wants to mandate the building of one parking spot per unit.

It makes no sense.

Cartmell has consistently proposed ideas that make no sense (infill moratorium and BRT to replace Valley Line West LRT come to mind.)

I don’t know Walters well enough.

Is he a serious candidate?

Knack seems like the only guy who is grounded in reality and isn’t coming up with half baked promises of cutting/freezing taxes without any plan of how they would do so.
 
Cartmell calling for moratorium again - this time an immediate halt to any multi-use path or bike lane under current construction that was part of active transportation acceleration plan such as the multi-use path along Kingsway Ave - a project that doesn't even involve any road space. In fact, 80% of the work in the plan he wants halted doesn't require any road space where vehicles travel as this work is mostly on boulevards. I really wonder if he's even aware of how much of this work is multi-use paths.

Anyway, as he knew it would, it failed.

View attachment 681849
The usual suspects voted against it.
 
View attachment 681868

How do you cut taxes by 22% while increasing the police budget? (The largest item in the City’s budget.)

It makes no sense.

I listened to Omar Mohammad on Jespersen today. He was saying 98-99% of people in Edmonton get around by car. Obviously wrong.

He wants to limit mid block infill to 6 units (fair enough) but wants to mandate the building of one parking spot per unit.

It makes no sense.

Cartmell has consistently proposed ideas that make no sense (infill moratorium and BRT to replace Valley Line West LRT come to mind.)

I don’t know Walters well enough.

Is he a serious candidate?

Knack seems like the only guy who is grounded in reality and isn’t coming up with half baked promises of cutting/freezing taxes without any plan of how they would do so.
I wonder what would happen if Council amended the zoning bylaw to be more lax regarding setbacks for garages. Mandated parking spots or not, developers want to have the option to provide parking, especially with alley access.
 
Cartmell and Jaffer announce they both want all city workers back in office full-time.

The two campaigns seem really close in policy.

If elected, I wonder if they will order everyone back 5 days a week almost immediately or if they will wait until the bridge projects and LRT/Jasper Ave projects are complete - otherwise they are just adding to the massive traffic congestion and commute times and inefficency.
 
Last edited:
... or if they will wait until the bridge projects and LRT/Jasper Ave projects are complete - otherwise they are just adding to the massive traffic congestion and commute times and inefficency.
Perhaps if they had to deal with the same things the rest of us do they might make different/better decisions regarding them.
 

Knack notes that Cartmell/Jaffer's back to office policy can't happen due to contract signed with workers.

So how is back to office policy going to work?
I was going to ask the same question. Administration does not report to council, and the remote work mandate was ratified by the union.

We're getting to the stage in the election where people are just saying whatever they think sounds good, regardless of the facts.
 
Perhaps if they had to deal with the same things the rest of us do they might make different/better decisions regarding them.

Seriously I don't think there are any city employees that don't have to come into the office at least a couple of days a week - certainly the higher ups do. And many city employees - transit drivers, parks and maintenance are on the road much of the day.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps if they had to deal with the same things the rest of us do they might make different/better decisions regarding them.

I know in Finland - where some reps from Oulu came here for the winter bike conference in 2024 - they put in practice such a plan. Maintenance crews that were contracted to do snow removal on their extensive bike network, as one example, were required to also ride those paths as the public would and report on it based on some key accessibility factors. It provided a high level of quality control.
 

Back
Top