evandyk
Senior Member
She probably negotiated more $ from the provincial government to pay for the Gardiner than the Indy would have ever generated in 5 or even 10 years.
No, but we all got that it's what you meant.Please don’t put words in my mouth. I did not say that. At. All.
if they did it would be just another bylaw that's never enforcedWill the City of Toronto copy the City of Brampton?
![]()
City of Brampton – Your Local Government
#DYK? You need to request a permit to display different signs. In #Brampton, signs are regulated to help keep the City safe and avoid clutter that can be distracting. Request a permit to display...www.facebook.com
View attachment 678828
I cannot wait to drink the tears of Markham residents crying about the roads being closed for it and complaining about too much noise and how "they should move this downtown!"Good riddance.
I feel like moves like this by suburban mayors is to try to justify an increased pay for them (look at what I've done!) rather than a benefit for their constituents. I will apologize if this materially improves Markham (but it won't)I cannot wait to drink the tears of Markham residents crying about the roads being closed for it and complaining about too much noise and how "they should move this downtown!"
The hilarious part is that of course none of the big spenders will be staying anywhere other than the top hotels in the core. They aren't partying at some shitty nightclub in a strip mall in Markham.
We essentially outsourced the road closures and the low-spend tourists, but will keep all the big money here. It's actually a financially genius move by Chow. Get rid of the worst of it and keep the best of it.
I cannot wait to drink the tears of Markham residents crying about the roads being closed for it and complaining about too much noise and how "they should move this downtown!"
The hilarious part is that of course none of the big spenders will be staying anywhere other than the top hotels in the core. They aren't partying at some shitty nightclub in a strip mall in Markham.
We essentially outsourced the road closures and the low-spend tourists, but will keep all the big money here. It's actually a financially genius move by Chow. Get rid of the worst of it and keep the best of it.
Will the City of Toronto copy the City of Brampton?
![]()
City of Brampton – Your Local Government
#DYK? You need to request a permit to display different signs. In #Brampton, signs are regulated to help keep the City safe and avoid clutter that can be distracting. Request a permit to display...www.facebook.com
View attachment 678828
I’m not sure I agree with this perspective. On tourist spending, you may be right—most non-local visitors (say, those from outside Ontario) will likely still stay in the core and commute to Markham. But the concern isn’t about this one event; it’s about whether this signals the start of a trend where fewer large-scale events are held downtown. If the core ends up with fewer attractions and events, the long-term impact could be significant. What makes it more troubling is if these decisions are being driven by residents in the core who simply want to avoid traffic or noise—because if that’s the case, the broader implications are quite discouraging.
There are currently trade shows being held at the "International Centre" in Malton, next to Pearson Airport. There is the Malton GO Station next door to it. However, I likely do not go there. Even with a car, the traffic congestion is not worth it.This isn't the trend, though. The trend is that people and events want to be downtown. People want to be able to take transit and walk to events. The Indy is bucking the trend, but it's not setting a new one.
This isn't the trend, though. The trend is that people and events want to be downtown. People want to be able to take transit and walk to events. The Indy is bucking the trend, but it's not setting a new one.
And there's probably backfill demand that can fill up that event calendar space downtown too, but also what you said goes really with the Indy being an inefficient use of our resources.
It's not Formula 1, which would draw international tourists for extended stays. Indy pulls in local people by the thousands, yes, but the Blue Jays are pulling in local people by the tens of thousands for a home game now around 12 times per month, and they don't require any roads to be closed. This is pretty low on the scale of value for money in Toronto.
The big money at this event comes only from the drivers' teams, sponsors, media, and Indy officials and workers at hotels and restaurants, but there's lots of events you can pull in to replace that which don't require a swath of road shut down for cars to zip by at an impressive speed.
And you don't think people in Markham—where 85% of all commuting is done by car, truck or van—are going to complain about the noise and traffic? This thing's gonna block off a part of the city for several days, if not a full week during preparation; specifically sections of Regional Road 3/Kennedy Road and Enterprise Blvd. Aside from the brief stretch of the Lakeshore (which for many is just a secondary route to the Gardiner), Toronto's Indy routed through relatively empty CNE grounds.Yep, that’s fair — I agree that, among all events, this one doesn’t have much impact. It’s more about the sentiment of “no noise, no traffic” in my backyard — which happens to be downtown Toronto. I don’t think that sentiment should be placated in the slightest, because if it’s given any credibility, it could set the stage for a broader trend.
It was proposed in the 1970s, but rejected.... It's not Formula 1, which would draw international tourists for extended stays...