News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

This may fit here or in the Doug Ford thread ...

From this week's economist:

MAURA RYAN, a speech therapist in New York City, was dreading the introduction of congestion pricing. To see her patients in Queens and Manhattan she sometimes drives across the East River a couple of times a day. The idea of paying a $9 toll each day infuriated her. Yet since the policy was actually implemented, she has changed her mind. A journey which used to take an hour or more can now be as quick as 15 minutes. “Well, this is very nice,” she admits thinking. Ms Ryan is not alone. Polls show more New Yorkers now support the toll than oppose it. A few months ago, it saw staunch opposition.

Congestion pricing came into effect in Manhattan on January 5th, just two weeks before Donald Trump became president. So far it has been almost miraculous in its effects. Traffic is down by about 10%, leading to substantially faster journeys, especially at the pinch-points of bridges and tunnels. Car-noise complaints are down by 70%. Buses are travelling so much faster that their drivers are having to stop and wait to keep to their schedules. The congestion charge is raising around $50m each month to update the subway and other public-transport systems, and ridership is up sharply. Broadway attendance is rising, not falling, as some feared.

New Yorkers may be surprised by how well it is all working. They shouldn’t be. London’s congestion charge, introduced over 20 years ago, had similar effects there. What they should be astonished by is the fact that it took almost half a century to be implemented. The principle of congestion pricing was first outlined by an economist at New York’s Columbia University, William Vickrey, in the 1960s. A version, reintroducing bridge tolls, almost went into effect in the 1970s before Congress killed it.

The current scheme was muscled through the state legislature by Andrew Cuomo, then the governor, in 2019. It took six years to come into force. Last year, with the cameras ready to roll, it was delayed again by Kathy Hochul, Mr Cuomo’s successor. Only after Donald Trump won re-election did it start. New York is thus decades late to an idea it invented, another example of how hard it can be for cities to do the obvious.■
 
This may fit here or in the Doug Ford thread ...

From this week's economist:

MAURA RYAN, a speech therapist in New York City, was dreading the introduction of congestion pricing. To see her patients in Queens and Manhattan she sometimes drives across the East River a couple of times a day. The idea of paying a $9 toll each day infuriated her. Yet since the policy was actually implemented, she has changed her mind. A journey which used to take an hour or more can now be as quick as 15 minutes. “Well, this is very nice,” she admits thinking. Ms Ryan is not alone. Polls show more New Yorkers now support the toll than oppose it. A few months ago, it saw staunch opposition.

Congestion pricing came into effect in Manhattan on January 5th, just two weeks before Donald Trump became president. So far it has been almost miraculous in its effects. Traffic is down by about 10%, leading to substantially faster journeys, especially at the pinch-points of bridges and tunnels. Car-noise complaints are down by 70%. Buses are travelling so much faster that their drivers are having to stop and wait to keep to their schedules. The congestion charge is raising around $50m each month to update the subway and other public-transport systems, and ridership is up sharply. Broadway attendance is rising, not falling, as some feared.

New Yorkers may be surprised by how well it is all working. They shouldn’t be. London’s congestion charge, introduced over 20 years ago, had similar effects there. What they should be astonished by is the fact that it took almost half a century to be implemented. The principle of congestion pricing was first outlined by an economist at New York’s Columbia University, William Vickrey, in the 1960s. A version, reintroducing bridge tolls, almost went into effect in the 1970s before Congress killed it.

The current scheme was muscled through the state legislature by Andrew Cuomo, then the governor, in 2019. It took six years to come into force. Last year, with the cameras ready to roll, it was delayed again by Kathy Hochul, Mr Cuomo’s successor. Only after Donald Trump won re-election did it start. New York is thus decades late to an idea it invented, another example of how hard it can be for cities to do the obvious.■
We can hope that in a few years, after NYC's charge has been widely accepted as successful, we could broach the idea of something like this here. I think it is disheartening when the economically rational thing for me to do when I go downtown on a weekend with my partner is to drive and pay for parking, because it is cheaper, more flexible and usually no slower than GO.
 
I can see the the "angry" vote coming out in full force from pro-israel lobby even if she does improve in the polls.
My community facebook group is constantly filled with angry comments about Chow and her not deporting protestors, and Mendicino and Bradford are ready to jump on it.

Bradford and Mendicino can compete to be the biggest goyim Israel lobby candidate, unless, of course Kevin Vuong joins the race.
 
Bradford and Mendicino can compete to be the biggest goyim Israel lobby candidate, unless, of course Kevin Vuong joins the race.
I really hope the mayoral race doesn't become a referendum on Isreal-Gaza like the NYC campagin has become. That debate sucks out all the oxygen from the major issues the city faces.
 
Last edited:
Parking on any street should always be considered TEMPORARY. It should be not storage space for any motor vehicle. The street is "owned" by the city, not the province, not adjacent property owner, and certainly not the motor vehicle.
Have you met some of the drivers in this city?

 
We shall see, or not!

News Release


June 21, 2025

City of Toronto launches cleaning blitz to protect public spaces, streets, and parks

Today, Mayor Olivia Chow launched a new citywide initiative called Keep Toronto Beautiful aimed at keeping public spaces clean, safe and well-maintained. A clean city impacts public health, the environment, the economy and overall quality of life.

From now through fall, 300 to 400-person cleaning blitz crews will harness their energy to clean and refresh specific high cleaning-need areas. This work will include:

• Removal of graffiti, weeds and litter from streets, sidewalks, parks and other spaces
• Tree maintenance on streets and in parks
• Installing more than 600 new garbage and recycling bins in high-usage parks
• Intensified enforcement and clean-up of illegal dumping hotspots
• Street sweeping and clean-up of boulevards and laneways
• Repairs to potholes, bike lanes and bike rings
• Repainting pavement markings, including crosswalks, to improve road safety

These blitzes, planned for several Saturdays over a three-month period, are in addition to proactive daily patrols by City crews to identify and maintain areas in need of attention.

The City is also putting extra care into public parks and pools this summer with daily clean-up efforts that include repairing benches, picnic tables and other equipment, graffiti removal and litter pickup, as well as hiring up to 30 students to join summer park cleaning teams and adding more custodial staff to maintain 21 outdoor pools.

Data will drive the approach to identify neighbourhoods where cleaning blitzes are most needed. Crews will resolve 311 Service Requests as well as applying an equity lens to prioritize cleaning and repairs in historically underserved, low-income and vulnerable communities where the City typically receives fewer 311 Service Requests.
 
Parking on any street should always be considered TEMPORARY. It should be not storage space for any motor vehicle. The street is "owned" by the city, not the province, not adjacent property owner, and certainly not the motor vehicle.
In Tokyo, AIUI, in order to register a vehicle you must have an off-street place to park it. As this law does not effect me, and would benefit my neighbourhood I'd support it. I just asked ChatGPT:

In Tokyo (and across most of Japan), there is a national law called the:

"Garage Certificate" Requirement

(車庫証明書 / Shako Shomeisho)

Summary:

Under the Road Vehicle Act (道路運送車両法), anyone who wants to register a passenger car (except motorcycles and very small kei cars in some rural areas) must prove they have access to a permanent parking space near their residence—usually within 2 kilometers.

Key Requirements:

  • You must submit a Shako Shomeisho (garage certificate) issued by the local police station.
  • The parking space must be:
    • Owned or leased (you’ll need documentation)
    • Accessible 24/7
    • Within a specified distance of your home
  • Without it, you cannot register the vehicle, and thus cannot legally own or drive it.

Purpose:

  • Reduce illegal street parking
  • Prevent congestion
  • Encourage efficient land use in dense urban areas like Tokyo
 
Nominations are open for the Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge Park council byelection.

Election Day is on Monday, September 29.

 

One arm of the City telling people to stay safe in the heat by cooling off in a local pool; meanwhile Parks is closing the pools for staff safety.....

OMG, SMH and some other NSFW things on top of those....

@DSCToronto is there anything this department can't mishandle?
 

One arm of the City telling people to stay safe in the heat by cooling off in a local pool; meanwhile Parks is closing the pools for staff safety.....

OMG, SMH and some other NSFW things on top of those....

@DSCToronto is there anything this department can't mishandle?
In a story about this from Toronto Today,
"In response to a question about why lifeguards didn't jump into the pools to cool off, Chow said that they are allowed to do so, but many are young and inexperienced at the job."

You're a lifeguard, you're hot, there's a pool right in front of you, and you just swelter without jumping in?? COME ON people. Chow getting no help from such a lack of critical thinking.

But in fairness, maybe some did and it wasn't a big help. I played soccer yesterday at 6 and it was brutal. I was in a daze for hours after.
 
In a story about this from Toronto Today,
"In response to a question about why lifeguards didn't jump into the pools to cool off, Chow said that they are allowed to do so, but many are young and inexperienced at the job."

Honestly, if you're so young and inexperienced that you can't think for yourself, you shouldn't be responsible for saving lives.

It's not an excuse.
 
This, sent to me by a neighbour who wrote to Councillor Mallik's office. PFR 'at work'

Thank you for your email about the Copeland Transformer Station parkette and the condition of the Salmon Run fountain at the base of CN Tower and Rogers Centre. We share your concerns and agree these are important public spaces.

On your behalf, I had reached out to senior City staff within Toronto Hydro as well as the Economic Development & Culture division regarding a status update on this iconic fountain. Please find the responses I received below:

On the Copeland Transformer Station parkette:

The parkette on the roof of the Copeland Transformer Station hasn’t been opened to the public yet.

Our Facilities Team is still working on the site and with City Staff to resolve an assortment of outstanding issues, primarily related to physical safety and security around an actively in-use Station with high voltage equipment and heavy-duty vehicle access. Arson and trespassing incidents around the station and parkette have raised particular concerns.

These issues have required us to take another look at preventative measures to have in place before the parkette can be safely opened. This includes safety and access related signage; pedestrian risk mitigations for unassumed road with semi-trailer truck access, security camera coverage and alarms for monitoring, etc.

We are hopeful that this work will be completed over the coming months with the parkette ready to open by the Fall of 2025.

On the Salmon Run fountain:

City Council approved funding for the restoration of Salmon Run beginning in 2025, as part of the Budget process. In 2025, City staff will be investigating the feasibility of restoration options, including repair and replacement of the fountain infrastructure, and a potential reimagining of the space. Staff will work with the local Councillor’s office and community partners to review these options and select a preferred path forward by the start of 2026. Construction is expected to take place over 2026-27.

The need for the restoration of the fountain has previously been discussed with community partners, but had been on hold with the intention of aligning work with the construction of a new building adjacent to the fountain area. With the timelines for this other building now delayed, the City will proceed with the fountain restoration.

In the interim, the City has engaged local artist Karen Roberts tocreate artwork on aluminium panels surrounding the fountain.She drew inspiration from Salmon Run for the artwork, with imagery reflecting the native ecosystem. The panels will both protect the safety of the site while construction is underway while also creating a more welcoming public space.

Thank you once again for your engagement, and your care in ensuring that our public spaces are fun and accessible for all. I hope this was helpful.
 
Honestly, if you're so young and inexperienced that you can't think for yourself, you shouldn't be responsible for saving lives.

It's not an excuse.

The decision to close will not have been taken by on-site lifeguards. It will have been taken by a Manager or Director.
 

Back
Top