Looks like the twin tracking of the Barrie line hasn't gone passed Aurora as of yet. Work has not yet started on any of the crossings north of the station.
I thought 15 minute service had been extended to Bradford?There won't be any double track north of Aurora. It won't be needed as the headways north of Aurora will be hourly - just passing sidings are needed for that..
- Paul
Speaking of...A bit of a paper promise imho
Oh... I already asked (email)...
Speaking of...
After some back and forth, I got a non-answer about the LSE Express trains; essentially, they don't have a schedule.
I find it quite frustrating the way they don't really read your messages (this message below after we discussed I wasn't looking for reasons why there is no express service, but looking for approximate return of service date); here is the response, the only important detail underlined in red:
View attachment 575688
I mean they still havent rebuilt the southern half of the bridges. I dont see how they can get the 3rd track in before 2026 at least. Theyre at least a year and a half behindSpeaking of...
After some back and forth, I got a non-answer about the LSE Express trains; essentially, they don't have a schedule.
I find it quite frustrating the way they don't really read your messages (this message below after we discussed I wasn't looking for reasons why there is no express service, but looking for approximate return of service date); here is the response, the only important detail underlined in red:
View attachment 575688
I don't see how they can be 18 months behind. I don't think the contract was even awarded that long ago! And in my opinion, the speed they've been moving with construction along the shared corridor is very impressive.I mean they still havent rebuilt the southern half of the bridges. I dont see how they can get the 3rd track in before 2026 at least. Theyre at least a year and a half behind
In some cases it is impossible to give a timeframe when X will be ready as there a number of unknowns as well providing a timeframe that may slip a number of time. Crosstown is a good example of slipping timeframe to the point there isn't one now.Speaking of...
After some back and forth, I got a non-answer about the LSE Express trains; essentially, they don't have a schedule.
I find it quite frustrating the way they don't really read your messages (this message below after we discussed I wasn't looking for reasons why there is no express service, but looking for approximate return of service date); here is the response, the only important detail underlined in red:
View attachment 575688
As a former project manager, I'm well aware of unknowns (risks); but that is no excuse for not having estimates and communicating slippage to your customers (the public). Metrolinx has failed to do so on a few projects, and now all we get is silence. It leaves an impression of poor management, and thoughts of wasteful spending come to mind...Is there any accountability?In some cases it is impossible to give a timeframe when X will be ready as there a number of unknowns as well providing a timeframe that may slip a number of time.
The project has gone so poorly the (project) managers have lost control and refuse to commit to any sort of completion (or at least this is the impression they are now giving).Crosstown is a good example of slipping timeframe to the point there isn't one now.
Strong disagree. If Metrolinx cannot be held to account, then someone else should fill the role. Answering questions about why the project is overbudget/overtime is part of the job. I am fine with projects going over if it is communicated and explained within reason, and I would guess the public may accept too... Refusing to communicate is not a good look.End of the day, there is a schedule when things are to be completed, but things happen to the point ML has stop saying what that date things will be completed due to the backlash from the public and media when those dates don't happen. This is one case where I do support ML doing this which is rare.
Right now, ML lost faith with the public in 2010 starting with management and has gone hills more since then. It lost faith withAs a former project manager, I'm well aware of unknowns (risks); but that is no excuse for not having estimates and communicating slippage to your customers (the public). Metrolinx has failed to do so on a few projects, and now all we get is silence. It leaves an impression of poor management, and thoughts of wasteful spending come to mind...Is there any accountability?
The project has gone so poorly the (project) managers have lost control and refuse to commit to any sort of completion (or at least this is the impression they are now giving).
Strong disagree. If Metrolinx cannot be held to account, then someone else should fill the role. Answering questions about why the project is overbudget/overtime is part of the job. I am fine with projects going over if it is communicated and explained within reason, and I would guess the public may accept too... Refusing to communicate is not a good look.
You stop communicating to your stakeholders, you loose faith and confidence from others. Metrolinx is certainly living up to that standard as of late.
This is not the case in this work.You will not see any express trains in this area until mid to late 2025 with safety being the number reason since it is more rigid than construction sites. All work next to a live track has to be shut down with equipment moved away from the track with workers been well clear of the tracks.
Not often I ask for updates..........but I'm curious to know if anyone has seen the state of the Highland Creek culvert area work for the Stouffville line.
If the answer is yes, great, if not, perhaps @TwinHuey might indulge with a look-see.