haltcatchfire
Senior Member
Colliers acquisition of Triovest last year hopefully saves us from that last proposal, but I suppose the next round could be worse.
|
|
|
- Thread starter Surrealplaces
- Start date
YYCguy
Active Member
Whatever happens with that development, I hope there is a way to save/incorporate that row of heritage buildings/front facades. Maybe something like this:
CalgaryTiger
Senior Member
CalgaryTiger
Senior Member
A land use for this parcel kitty-corner to the Galloway goes to CPC on the 28th. Point two below drew my eye, makes it seem like there's a plan to actually move forward and this isn't a land-use flip.
Description
This application proposes to change the designation of this property to allow for:
Description
This application proposes to change the designation of this property to allow for:
- multi-residential development (e.g. apartment buildings);
- commercial uses within an existing building designated as a Municipal Historic Resource;
- a maximum building floor area of 4,550 square metres, based on a building floor to parcel area ratio of 7.0 achieved by providing bonus density items; and
- the uses listed in the CC-MH designation.
O-tac
Senior Member
Is that new or the same old version? Was hoping this thing was dead.
CalgaryTiger
Senior Member
I'll just keep going...
Land use on this parcel beside the recently converted Loft building was approved May 12th. This one could be a land flip. See if a DP ever materializes.
Description
This application proposes to change the designation of these properties from a Direct Control (DC) District to a new DC District to allow for:
Land use on this parcel beside the recently converted Loft building was approved May 12th. This one could be a land flip. See if a DP ever materializes.
Description
This application proposes to change the designation of these properties from a Direct Control (DC) District to a new DC District to allow for:
- High-density mixed-use development
Albertasaurus
Senior Member
It's the old (dead) version.
Roaring Flames
Senior Member
There's no current active proposal for the Stephen Ave Quarter site
outoftheice
Senior Member
Looks very similar to the original building. Not sure if that's a good or bad thing. Very happy to see reconstruction move forward though. When both breweries had their patios going strong it had such a unique vibe and made it a great spot to bring out of town guests to.Ol' Beautiful submitted plans for reconstruction of their building in Inglewood.
YYCguy
Active Member
This is a shame.
Something should be done before those buildings are too far gone.Albertasaurus
Senior Member
Agreed! Maybe if the now-sold Bay building reno/redevelopment gets underway in the nearish future, it'll trigger interest in doing something to that block before it's too late.This is a shame.
BigWoofer
New Member
So glad to see it getting rebuilt, but a little disappointed that it will look essentially identical on the outside. Hopefully they do something interesting with the interior (which if the sound room is any indication, they will).Ol' Beautiful submitted plans for reconstruction of their building in Inglewood.
potatopizzafan
Active Member
Not suprised the building will be the same as its an insurance rebuild. If they would have changed the design or went with a bigger building they would have received a payout for the ACV (actual cash value) of the previous building which probably would have been 50% of the rebuild cost. Plus incurred all of the additional expenses related to any changes/upgrades.
By rebuilding back "like-for-like", insurance covers the full cost of the rebuild.
By rebuilding back "like-for-like", insurance covers the full cost of the rebuild.
Last edited:
DiscoStu
Senior Member
Will be hard to recapture the worn-in character in a brand new building, but hopefully it's close as possible to the old one.
Great to hear the old house will be staying.A land use for this parcel kitty-corner to the Galloway goes to CPC on the 28th. Point two below drew my eye, makes it seem like there's a plan to actually move forward and this isn't a land-use flip.
View attachment 739106
Description
This application proposes to change the designation of this property to allow for:
Nest is around 50,000 square feet this is just below 49,000 square feet. Just sayin...
- multi-residential development (e.g. apartment buildings);
- commercial uses within an existing building designated as a Municipal Historic Resource;
- a maximum building floor area of 4,550 square metres, based on a building floor to parcel area ratio of 7.0 achieved by providing bonus density items; and
- the uses listed in the CC-MH designation.