News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.8K     0 
TTC staff: The TSP in the contract is the basic TSP that goes back decades, which is either extending the green or shortening the red.

Matlow: and is that on right now?

TTC staff: That is on right now
This is some bulls***. Either it's not working as intended or, in practice, not working at all. See @reaperexpress 's very insightful post as to why TSP is so bad for streetcars even though it's technically "turned on" for ~300 intersections.

Fair enough. Here's the full transcript:

Myers: when we say, you know, we're now testing aggressive transit signal priority. This is not something new to the rest of the world.

TTC: Correct.

Myers: It's just new to Toronto

TTC: through the chair. It is actually, it is actually relatively new, I believe this sort of aggressive TSP has been used in other places Europe, but I'm not as familiar with it being used elsewhere in North America, we would be, again, a bit of a pioneer, I think, in North America.

Myers: So it's new to North America, but it's not new to Europe, correct?

TTC: Correct. Or Asia, yeah.

Myers: So as we sort of go forward and try to figure out the right steps, are we talking to those other transit systems who have been operating these types of LRT lines with this type of aggressive transit signal priority. Are we talking to them? Are we having conversation? And if so, which ones are we talking to you?

TTC: through you chair, yes. Just recently with the UITP light rail committee in Toronto, we had a opportunity to connect with a lot of our peers and exchange contact information. And so that includes folks in Vienna, in Prague, in London, like all the places out that way that are part of UITP.

Myers: And will you be going to those cities to actually see how this works, see like, actually see how this is actually rolling out and works, and taking those learnings back. One thing to like, talk about things over the phone. There's nothing to go actually see how it works and get those questions asked. I'm looking at the bosses.

TTC: Sure we would love to

Myers: But in all seriousness, I think it's important that we actually have a better understanding about how this actually works in practice, and sure that same bumps when they rolled this out, which perhaps we could avoid as we move forward, as there's now a lot of pressure and eyes on the TTC, the City of Toronto, Metrolinx, in terms of how we actually get these things moving forward. I'm also a bit surprised from the response from Commissioner Osborne in terms of like, there's no noticeable improvement in the in the end to end run times we've just spent half billion dollars.

These clowns at the TTC sound like they've never stepped foot outside the Province, much less own a passport or left the country... I don't think they even know how transit signal priority works in Toronto like @reaperexpress , much less elsewhere in North America, the Americas, Europe, or Asia... *EDIT Grammar: @reaperexpress is the resident expert on transit signal priority, sorry if unclear.

1765398925158.png
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the clarification.
I do believe ION vehicles get a green light before left turns at certain intersections but not positive
ION doesn't have the aggressive form of transit priority that is being considered here. There are still instances where the trains wait for left-turning vehicles but they do modify cycle times quite a bit more aggressively than in Toronto.
 
Councillor Saxe: what is the status of improving the Spadina streetcar? When will we start seeing real improvements there?

TTC staff: we believe we should start to have that online by early February at this point in time

Saxe: how much will that improve travel time?

TTC staff: there's gonna be changes to the surrounding traffic time so it's still a little early... the intent is to report in the congestion management report early next year

Saxe: are you thinking about eliminating left turns?

TTC staff: we're looking at parking changes. we can certainly look at impact of left turns but would require larger study than what we're doing

Saxe: two stage pedestrian crossings in Spadina? have you considered staggered crossings?

TTC staff: we're looking at that

Saxe: I understand that Kitchener has true TSP. Have you reviewed their system?

TTC staff: we can certainly look into that but it's always depending on what technology they use and how it varies with us

Saxe: but not something you've reviewed?

TTC staff: not yet
 
Last edited:
Fair enough. Here's the full transcript:

Myers: when we say, you know, we're now testing aggressive transit signal priority. This is not something new to the rest of the world.

TTC: Correct.

Myers: It's just new to Toronto

TTC: through the chair. It is actually, it is actually relatively new, I believe this sort of aggressive TSP has been used in other places Europe, but I'm not as familiar with it being used elsewhere in North America, we would be, again, a bit of a pioneer, I think, in North America.

Myers: So it's new to North America, but it's not new to Europe, correct?

TTC: Correct. Or Asia, yeah.

Myers: So as we sort of go forward and try to figure out the right steps, are we talking to those other transit systems who have been operating these types of LRT lines with this type of aggressive transit signal priority. Are we talking to them? Are we having conversation? And if so, which ones are we talking to you?

TTC: through you chair, yes. Just recently with the UITP light rail committee in Toronto, we had a opportunity to connect with a lot of our peers and exchange contact information. And so that includes folks in Vienna, in Prague, in London, like all the places out that way that are part of UITP.

Myers: And will you be going to those cities to actually see how this works, see like, actually see how this is actually rolling out and works, and taking those learnings back? It's one thing to like, talk about things over the phone. There's nothing to go actually see how it works and get those questions asked.

TTC: Sure, yeah, I'm looking at the bosses. [chuckles]. Sure we would love to

Myers: But in all seriousness, I think it's important that we actually have a better understanding about how this actually works in practice, and sure that same bumps when they rolled this out, which perhaps we could avoid as we move forward, as there's now a lot of pressure and eyes on the TTC, the City of Toronto, Metrolinx, in terms of how we actually get these things moving forward. I'm also a bit surprised from the response from Commissioner Osborne in terms of like, there's no noticeable improvement in the in the end to end run times we've just spent half billion dollars.
Fully appreciate these updates from the board! Just noticing people are agitated and quick to jump on things, and misunderstandings about TTC/Metrolinx are rampant
This is some bulls***. Either it's not working as intended or, in practice, not working at all. See @reaperexpress 's very insightful post as to why TSP is so bad for streetcars even though it's technically "turned on" for ~300 intersections.
Definitely feels like one of those awful technically true answers. While they do apparently use some "basic form" of TSP, it's not good enough :/
 
The staff are being caught lying in the act. Plain and simple. They never had any intention to look at other places on how TSP works nor how to run a modern LRT system.

Would be gold if some asked the staff if their original intention was to run the LRT as they would have with the existing antiquated streetcar system.
 
Saxe: how similar is the transit experience on spadina to experience on dundas that don't have dedicated ROW. How much can we generalize learnings?

TTC staff: for those corridors in mixed traffic other factors are more relevant like removing parking

Saxe: do you need more authorization from the board to speed those up?

TTC staff: we do not need more authorization but we need city council approval to remove parking and that's where we get held up

Myers: can you explain relationship between frequency of stops and inability to reach higher speed?

TTC staff: we have quite a few more stops than many other cities.

Myers: has that been reviewed since we changed to the new streetcars?

TTC staff: we have in a more localized setting. we're now embarking on a more comprehensive network wide review. if the desire is faster service the recommendation will be stop removals, though we recognize those are always difficult and contentious

Myers: when the decision is made to remove a stop there's nothing actually stopping the TTC from removing it right?

TTC staff: yes but we typically consult with the local councillor and their staff. The outcome in almost all cases is do not remove our stop

Myers: is there any reason a streetcar in its own ROW should not be going faster than cars?

TTC staff: in pure theory no. however there's other factors to consider: stop spacing, TSP, folks entering our ROW.

Myers: have we looked into barriers to stop people entering our ROWs?

TTC staff: we're looking into it
 
No, this isn't what was said. Staff said the aggressive form of TSP -- giving transit the signal ahead of left turning vehicles -- would be new to North America. Not that TSP entirely isn't used elsewhere.
Let me give you a revelation. It is NOT new to North America, these people are willfully ignorant clowns, and you should not carry water for them.
 
Thanks for the clarification.
I do believe ION vehicles get a green light before left turns at certain intersections but not positive
YES
I think we all want this, strong active signal priority. 20 seconds before the ION LRT even reaches the intersection, all other road traffic is halted.

If Waterloo can do it on Day 1 a full six years ago, why can't we? And it doesn't necessarily have to be as big as a 20 second margin. This isn't rocket science. Even if ION doesn't get priority, much less preemption at every single intersection, it is still much better than what we have so far with Line 6's clownshow.

 
This is some bulls***. Either it's not working as intended or, in practice, not working at all. See @reaperexpress 's very insightful post as to why TSP is so bad for streetcars even though it's technically "turned on" for ~300 intersections.



These clowns at the TTC sound like they've never stepped foot outside the Province, much less own a passport or left the country... I don't think they even know how transit signal priority works in Toronto like @reaperexpress , much less elsewhere in North America, the Americas, Europe, or Asia...

View attachment 701996
What are the salaries of these staff members? Who will be held to account?
 
Let me give you a revelation. It is NOT new to North America, these people are willfully ignorant clowns, and you should not carry water for them.
Where in North America uses the aggressive form of transit signal priority being discussed and proposed?

I'm not carrying water for them. I'm in favour of people accurately understanding what was and wasn't said, but you seem to have a problem with that because you don't view them favourably...?
 
I think this is relevant here. Someone posted on Reddit about the Line 9 tramline in the Paris area. It is exactly the same length at 10.3km. Has 19 stops. and can do the end to end trip in 32min. (scheduled at 30min)

Look in this video at how aggressively they drive the trams. There seem to be many more pedestrian and car crossings than on Finch West. Most lights switch off before the tram arrives.
 
Where in North America uses the aggressive form of transit signal priority being discussed and proposed?

I'm not carrying water for them. I'm in favour of people accurately understanding what was and wasn't said, but you seem to have a problem with that because you don't view them favourably...?

Why does it matter? Do it or don't - the time to talk about it was before you build the damned thing.

AoD
 

Back
Top