News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.8K     0 
Out of everything I’ve read on Twitter and UT, watched on YouTube both transit nerds and mainstream news, I haven’t heard one person advocate to keep the LRT without TSP.

So who really is supporting not turning it on?
The city Transportation department doesn't want it.
 
It has been said that this is day one of real service, and TTC doesn't want Ottawa issues on this line to the point it may take 6 months to see a decrease in runtime to a point. Until there is a real transit priority signal system in play. Let's see what April will bring for service quality
The public outcry might be larger than Ottawa when Eglinton opens with these slow speeds as well.
 
These left-hand turns wouldn't be a problem if they implemented what I recommended ages ago. That is to follow what many other street running LRTs do............they get rid of ALL the left-hand turns at intersections by designing the system to not need them. They do this by having U-turn lanes each-way mid-block controlled by lights. Some places actually have it for not only the transit running street but also all the cross streets. They found that not only does it make the trains much faster and reliable but also actually improves traffic flow on both roads and is safer for both pedestrians and cyclists. Basically the intersection become nothing more than a big "+" with just right hand turns allowed. LA has done this in sections of it's LRT street running lines and it made both the drivers and transit riders happier. People making left-hand turns were actually able to do it faster during rush-hours.

Of course this would have required planning and someone spending 10 minutes online out of 6 years to see how other cities solve the left-hand turn problem, but we all know that's FAR to much to ask from Metrolinx, a shockingly incompetent and corrupt body if ever there was one.

There is NO way this line should take more than 30 minutes end to end and they should aim for 20 minutes like Edmonton's similar Valley Line. That means no stopping at ANY light for ANY reason {except emergency vehicles} and getting rid of some of these superfluous stops, at least 5 of them. A supposed rapid transit line in the burbs should really only average about one station/stop per km and the fewer the stations, the easier it is to synchronize the lights and maintain schedules.
 
Last edited:
I have it on good authority, neither the Mayor's Office, nor the Premier's are pleased by the reception here and negative media coverage. How they will respond, remains to be seen.

Collectively, we need to keep the pressure on everyone here, from the TTC to Mx, from the Mayor to the Minister to make clear this performance is not acceptable and must not be allowed to continue.

Good, but then again, what did they expect? People under their watch was either asleep or couldn't be bothered to heed the warnings.


And why would *anyone* in these organizations believe that this "expected pace" is acceptable, to such an extent that they signed off on it before opening? It makes me question their suitability for continued involvement in transit planning - because it is very clear that user benefit isn't their clear priority.

AoD
 
Collectively, we need to keep the pressure on everyone here, from the TTC to Mx, from the Mayor to the Minister to make clear this performance is not acceptable and must not be allowed to continue.
Absolutely!

I have been very encouraged by both the public and media coverage of this issue. For ones it's not ppl complaining about 10 different things with 10 possible solutions but rather everyone is in agreement here.

Going into an election year I suspect the mayor will want to address this. ESPECIALLY if eglinton lrt will have the same issue.

I think significantly improving speeds is a totally easy political win!
 
Last edited:
37 minutes is still slower than the bus.
Well, no, the average travel time for the bus is that much.


And most of the time (read: not always) that's faster than the actual scheduled time. Besides, 37 would be shortening the journey time by almost 20 minutes compared to opening day, that's not bad at all. There may be room for more improvements if we raised the line top speed, though - I would be really interested in seeing what kind of average speed we would achieve if every LRV accelerated to track speed as fast as possible, and then maintained that speed until the next stop.
 
Last edited:
yes with zero traffic, but a few pages back someone showed data over a 24 hour period whereby the average bus took 51 minutes.
That is straight up misinformation, the 36 bus' averages and medians for both ways are all below 37 minutes, except for the 37:20 median for Humber to Finch West. The current highest travel time for Line 6 is more than 60 minutes, and average Line 6 trips are near the highest travel time for the 36 bus at 52-63 minutes.

Top comment: "I was driving during rush hour and all the shuttle buses were packed while the trams were hardly full. By evening it looked like a majority of commuters intentionally chose the jam packed shuttle buses because it was much faster"

I'm going to do something a little crazy here, and provide actual numbers and data, something which this thread has been appallingly light on in the last while.

TransSee offers average travel time data. It's a free feature for streetcar routes, and a premium feature for buses.

Here is what it says for the 36 as of November 24, a Monday, heading westbound.

My search, showing this is a comparison of travel times between Finch West station and Highway 27/Humber College Boulevard.

View attachment 700141
The full data:
View attachment 700136
View attachment 700137
View attachment 700138
View attachment 700139

This is a summary of the data. The average travel time is 36:51 minutes, against a scheduled time of 45:13 (how's that for schedule writing and adherence?). The quickest trip was completed in 23:49 against a scheduled time of 32:59, while the highest travel time was 1 hour and 3 minutes, against a scheduled time of 56:18.

View attachment 700140
As a note, the sub-30 minute trips chiefly occur shortly before midnight.

And, for the same day, the information going eastbound:

View attachment 700144
View attachment 700145
View attachment 700146
View attachment 700147
View attachment 700148

Now that there are actual numbers here to capture an average day in the operation of a 36 bus, do with this information what thou wilst.

As an aside, a sharp eyed commenter on Steve Munro's blog pointed out some weird aspects to the publicly shown LRT schedule:

View attachment 700149
Sounds to me like they'd be able to improve the quality of the trip quite significantly purely by employing someone who actually knows how to write a schedule.
 
Well, no, the average travel time for the bus is that much.


And most of the time (read: not always) that's faster than the actual scheduled time. Besides, 37 would be shortening the journey time by almost 20 minutes compared to opening day, that's not bad at all. There may be room for more improvements if we raised the line top speed, though - I would be really interested in seeing what kind of average speed we would achieve if every LRV accelerated to track speed as fast as possible, and then maintained that speed until the next stop.
in low traffic, the bus makes the trip in 31 minutes with more stops (see citytv report below).
The LRT has no traffic and is aiming for 37 minutes????

 

Back
Top