crs1026
Superstar
Are you kidding? Do some research. The engineering and design costs are a fraction of the construction cost (typically 10%).
I was being sarcastic, yes. All the same - If those costs are typically 10%, ML probably runs 20%.
- Paul
Are you kidding? Do some research. The engineering and design costs are a fraction of the construction cost (typically 10%).
If the government does not have the contracts signed for the construction of this line signed by election time, I am very likely not going to be voting for them. Not because the FWLRT as an individual project is imperative, but because this project is a litmus test for how seriously this government views building transit. It's a limits test for if this government views transit as critical for Ontario's future, or merely as a tool to win votes. My patience is wearing thin with QP's incessant musing about building transit.
Now you know how us subway advocates feel seeing our pet projects slowly withering away on the vines as well thanks to the Liberal government's planning paralysis. Welcome to the club.
Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.What do I gotta do to be a "subway advocate"? Advocate for subways all the time, most of the time? It's a pretty bizarre thing to identify as.
But yes, it's frustrating. It's now going onto three election cycles where the Liberal campaigned on this (and Sheppard) being built, and three election cycles we've seen nothing actually built. Welcome to transit "planning" in Toronto.
Blaming Bombardier has become the transit equivalent of blaming Obama for everything that's wrong in the world, who I'm sure is also to blame for the Sheppart LRT too am I right?
THANKS BOMBARDIER!




