Out of Towner
Active Member
Pagaro Investments isn't obligated to do more than the minimum. It should fit right in with those that can't do more.
You don't make any sense.In other words, the developer was unable to landscape its own property to the same or higher standard than that of most other community residents because of the city.
Pagaro took over this project as a hole in the ground after a different developer defaulted on the project during excavation.. wasn't much they could feasibly do to adjust the building setback footprint at that point.The revenue per door generated by the building would have improved if its footprint was moved off of the property line to allow for upgraded landscaping. It's an old way of thinking to build right up to the property line particularly in a residential setting. Even commercial projects are trending towards increasing public space rather than building right up to the property line and pouring a sidewalk.
Undercapitalized and/or could not secure financing. It's that easy.If the piles aren't placed then the setback can be modified but how in the hell does a developer default during the excavation stage of a project?
Excavation was complete when Pagaro took over.If the piles aren't placed then the setback can be modified but how in the hell does a developer default during the excavation stage of a project?
And I look forward to seeing you're next building where you've built way in from the property line and the most beautifully landscaped lot.Defend Pagaro all you want but regardless of whose fault it is, the fact is that the landscaping on that project is sub-standard.
The are plenty of developments that are socially responsible that include some public space and if I was a developer I'd have some respect for the neighborhood even if I made a little less money.And I look forward to seeing you're next building where you've built way in from the property line and the most beautifully landscaped lot.
Let me know when it's complete so I can bask in the beauty
Permit issues with the city (source: the owners)
I don't mind this building but why oh why did they use black for those roof leaders? Should have colour matched the off-white colour so they don't 'stick out. Cost difference zero.
Don't you know black is the new grey.I don't mind this building but why oh why did they use black for those roof leaders? Should have colour matched the off-white colour so they don't 'stick out. Cost difference zero.
Permit issues with the city (source: the owners)