What do you think of this project?


  • Total voters
    34
Pagaro Investments isn't obligated to do more than the minimum. It should fit right in with those that can't do more.
 
In other words, the developer was unable to landscape its own property to the same or higher standard than that of most other community residents because of the city.
You don't make any sense.

The building is on property line. The sidewalks are city.

The developer built to what the city wanted on city property.

The trees that were suppose to be planted on the south side walk was turned down by epcor.

Why don't you tell us all what this developer should have done
 
The revenue per door generated by the building would have improved if its footprint was moved off of the property line to allow for upgraded landscaping. It's an old way of thinking to build right up to the property line particularly in a residential setting. Even commercial projects are trending towards increasing public space rather than building right up to the property line and pouring a sidewalk.
 
The revenue per door generated by the building would have improved if its footprint was moved off of the property line to allow for upgraded landscaping. It's an old way of thinking to build right up to the property line particularly in a residential setting. Even commercial projects are trending towards increasing public space rather than building right up to the property line and pouring a sidewalk.
Pagaro took over this project as a hole in the ground after a different developer defaulted on the project during excavation.. wasn't much they could feasibly do to adjust the building setback footprint at that point.
 
If the piles aren't placed then the setback can be modified but how in the hell does a developer default during the excavation stage of a project?
 
If the piles aren't placed then the setback can be modified but how in the hell does a developer default during the excavation stage of a project?
Excavation was complete when Pagaro took over.

You can easily go back in the thread history and see that.

Again spouting without knowing any facts or taking the time to care about it. You seem like you just like to complain and think you have all the answers
 
Defend Pagaro all you want but regardless of whose fault it is, the fact is that the landscaping on that project is sub-standard.
 
Defend Pagaro all you want but regardless of whose fault it is, the fact is that the landscaping on that project is sub-standard.
And I look forward to seeing you're next building where you've built way in from the property line and the most beautifully landscaped lot.

Let me know when it's complete so I can bask in the beauty
 
And I look forward to seeing you're next building where you've built way in from the property line and the most beautifully landscaped lot.

Let me know when it's complete so I can bask in the beauty
The are plenty of developments that are socially responsible that include some public space and if I was a developer I'd have some respect for the neighborhood even if I made a little less money.
 
Permit issues with the city (source: the owners)

Whoever's in charge of the City's red tape should be fired.

20241214_133829.jpg
 

Back
Top