Airboy
Senior Member
So looks like Airdrie is getting the next hospital. Airdrie MLA and Minister of Infrastructure was touring a hospital with modular construction down in Boston this week.
So the Southside hospital plan has been completely cancelled? I thought it was just still on hold?
According to a post on facebookTony Caterina just posted this morning his focus if elected major is a Northside hospital.
The Northside has Royal Alex, the busiest and oldest hospital in the province. One hospital for half the city.The South Edmonton Hospital is not cancelled AFAIK, and the northside already has the Royal Alex, not to mention the Sturgeon Hospital in St Albert. I think Caterina is yanking your chain.
A link to Caterina's FB post would be nice.
The Northside has Royal Alex, the busiest and oldest hospital in the province. One hospital for half the city.
The south side has Grey Nuns, Miseracordia, U of A and Stollery, not to mention the Leduc Community hospital in Leduc. The fact that the new hospital was set for the southside was a political gambit based on the competitiveness of the South West ridings. Caterina is speaking beyond the scope of the post he is running for, but he ain't wrong about the desperate need for a hospital in North Edmonton.
Misericordia's quick access via the whitemud means its serves a large chunk of the SW, and will continue to do so even when/if the new south hospital is built.Correction: The Misericordia is in the west end, almost across 170 St from WEM. So it hardly services the southside nor the northside.
There is no money committed for construction yet and probably will not be for years, if ever.We may never see another hospital built here in the next 10 years. Grey Nus will get some upgrades when out-patients moves to the new Covenant wellness centre in September but not much else. Covenant will also build a new wellness centre at the Miz and at least 3 other locations.
We see the UCP keep saying money for planning but building may never come. Thats next elections' sparkly bits.
I'm skeptical that they'll put money toward construction, but just to be clear it's a very common practice to set aside planning funds first, and construction funds once a lot of the planning/design is complete. It helps with cost certainty so that there's less risk of major cost escalations.There is no money committed for construction yet and probably will not be for years, if ever.
I understand and I might be a bit generous if they hadn't put out communications about these projects making it sound as if they are going ahead when in fact $NIL has been committed yet for any construction costs.I'm skeptical that they'll put money toward construction, but just to be clear it's a very common practice to set aside planning funds first, and construction funds once a lot of the planning/design is complete. It helps with cost certainty so that there's less risk of major cost escalations.