Glenco
Senior Member
$3 billion a year for 10 yearsHasn't the federal govt announced a multi billion fund over the next number of years for cities to apply?
$3 billion a year for 10 yearsHasn't the federal govt announced a multi billion fund over the next number of years for cities to apply?
You would still need them to play ball on a tunnel beneath the site. It significantly limits future development on that portion of their land and would come with significant supporting infrastructure that would still be required at the surface. City would also likely incur significant liability for any potential contamination or geotechnical issues (ie. what happens if tunnel collapses during construction or there are future settlement issues impacting the rail) encountered in the alignment.If CN doesn't want to play ball then a tunnel is a viable option.
I quite like the MUP tunnel in Norway that @TAS posted.
Ventilation shafts could also be an issue.You would still need them to play ball on a tunnel beneath the site. It significantly limits future development on that portion of their land and would come with significant supporting infrastructure that would still be required at the surface. City would also likely incur significant liability for any potential contamination or geotechnical issues (ie. what happens if tunnel collapses during construction or there are future settlement issues impacting the rail) encountered in the alignment.
Apples and oranges. The span over the CN yards and The Yellowhead are vastly different from the 170 street bridge. That is why a Cable Stay bridge is required other than more conventional methods.The picture I posted was a case in point that a bridge could be built over rail yards, even with piers between the tracks.
The active mode benefit @SarcasticMarmot noted above is a seriously underrated piece of why building this is important. Not only what a novelty it would be to ride/walk over, but would create a fantastic connector in the bike network for the northside, which presently is completely miserable to cross as a cyclist from basically the entire City west of Fort Road.
I found this article and it doesn't make much sense to me.
![]()
City may lose skilled trades if LRT expansion stops, warns contractor
"It seems the city's going to run out of momentum for rail projects after this one. We would like to have a job after this."edmontonjournal.com
Like... do they know about the Metro Line expansion? Yes, Phase 2 (NAIT to Castle Downs) is currently in land acquisition, but construction should be coming soon, especially when Yellowhead freeway conversion finishes in around 2027. Valley Line West construction should finish by 2029, so they'll definitely have another LRT project waiting for them.