[Agard]

What an unbelievable downgrade

 

[Kosy123]

 

[EtoV]

Ooof

 

[Agard]

Hopefully EDC doesn't let this go ahead

 

[Gronk!]

Yes:

View attachment 703990
View attachment 703991

View attachment 703992
View attachment 703993

View attachment 703994

Surely you jest

 

[archited]

Yikes! Madame Cataract's Rooming House. EDC could comment on this if they would be able to overcome their fits of laughter.

 

[scyeg]

Thanks, I hate it.

 

[northlands]

There are some nice elements here and while I understand the target market is student housing, the tiny windows and lack of balconies makes this look like they re-used plans from a continuing care hospital campus

 

[ChazYEG]

This is atrocious.

 

[inclusion]

It appears quite institutional to me and is in alignment with other student housing in the city and other campuses that offer dense, single-room-type housing (Dalhousie comes to mind).

 

[TAS]

I really wish Regency was developing this site instead.

 

[Kosy123]

I actually don't mind this one tbh

But the southside one that has the brick facade is atrocious

 

[Edmcowboy11]

Well on one side, the building will bring a bunch more people living in the area so that's a positive at least. As for the look of the building, that is definitely one of the most uninspired buildings that could have been put there.

 

[ChazYEG]

1980s Soviet Block called and asked for their designs back,

 

[inclusion]

I actually don't mind this one tbh
View attachment 703996
But the southside one that has the brick facade is atrocious
View attachment 703997

You could simply apply the same alternating treatment above the original brick side, and it would look much better overall.

I think it was always going to be smaller windows, though, to reach the 696 units.