IanO
Superstar
My understanding is that there was a XX$sqft that was palatable and on the table, but folks got a little greedy.
Yup, they wanted something like $100/sq. ft. while the City was proposing $50 per sq. ft. at the most. They got greedy and ended up getting nothing.My understanding is that there was a XX$sqft that was palatable and on the table, but folks got a little greedy.
Looking down while drunk from the 42nd at Encore.
Yes it does. I'm hearing it's a daycare.
Perhaps more is needed, but isn't there already a daycare for a long time in a building about a block away on 103rd and 100 Ave, the one with the brand new bar/restaurant?This would be fantastic. Exactly the sort of thing that is needed to attract and retain families downtown.
More is needed for that.This would be fantastic. Exactly the sort of thing that is needed to attract and retain families downtown.
Making our DT attractive for families to live in still feels like a red herring. Not a bad goal at all, and the 8 80 principle for building cities is wise to follow.More is needed for that.
Downtown isn't all that attractive for families with young kids. As a person with a young family who lives in a single family home way in the far north east here would be my barricades.
- My perception of safety downtown for my kids still isn't the greatest.
- Our LRT system is not efficient, nor is it safe for me to make my commute worth it.
- It lacks vibrancy, if downtown is about as active as a suburban neighborhood then my desire to give up a yard for it is greatly diminished.