What do you think of this project?


  • Total voters
    69

"Langham Developments is a key player in revitalizing 104 Street with other projects, such as Icon Tower and Fox Tower, bringing more residents to the downtown core. Falcon Tower was the next progression in this journey, with Falcon Two on the horizon for 2025." 👀

That'd be especially great if they keep Falcon 2 exactly the same as #1, as they said they would, because the majority of the units in Falcon 1 have two or more bedrooms; making it more likely that some families will live there. My rough napkin math is that it has ~26 3-bedroom units, 114 2-bedroom units, and 94 1-bedroom units.
Yes, this seems like a nice mix and the over 2,300 units in various buildings noted in the article is also good news, that will bring a good boost to the number of people living in the core.
 
2025? HERE WE GO BOYS AND GIRL


"Langham Developments is a key player in revitalizing 104 Street with other projects, such as Icon Tower and Fox Tower, bringing more residents to the downtown core. Falcon Tower was the next progression in this journey, with Falcon Two on the horizon for 2025." 👀

That'd be especially great if they keep Falcon 2 exactly the same as #1, as they said they would, because the majority of the units in Falcon 1 have two or more bedrooms; making it more likely that some families will live there. My rough napkin math is that it has ~26 3-bedroom units, 114 2-bedroom units, and 94 1-bedroom units.
Wouldn't be a surprise if single young people rent and share the 3 bedroom units as opposed to families. Either way it's good.
 
Wouldn't be a surprise if single young people rent and share the 3 bedroom units as opposed to families. Either way it's good.
That could very well be too. When I first moved out on my own, I rented a room in a small house that had five other guys living there. It was... an experience.
 
Falcon Tower I story

'with Falcon II on the horizon for 2025'
 
Not to mention that it was a win-win on ROI for public dollars.

If anything, we need more of these stories, not less.

Since this did work out well, I wonder why developers/downtown boosters didn't advocate for this same grant structure again, which didn't require the city to pay out any money from its budget.

Instead, when they came back to council for support, they focused on a grant per sq.ft and that didn't seem to be as favorable with council nor the public.
 
Since this did work out well, I wonder why developers/downtown boosters didn't advocate for this same grant structure again, which didn't require the city to pay out any money from its budget.

Instead, when they came back to council for support, they focused on a grant per sq.ft and that didn't seem to be as favorable with council nor the public.
IMO, probably not a good time to ask the city, which is financially strapped and already having to increase taxes more than it knows citizens can bear, for money.

I suppose, if they don't like the answer, they can always try again, but unless the above noted fundamentals change I feel that would probably be a waste of time.
 
My understanding is that there was a XX$sqft that was palatable and on the table, but folks got a little greedy.
 
Gdk9fojXIAARPDt


 

Back
Top