Somebody's in default, and the lender has had enough, hence the receivership appointment. And when something's in receivership, zero dollars get spent on the complex and unpaid vendors are screwed.

This one's going to be a bloodbath. I'm assuming equity < 0, and the lender is going to come out of this quite bruised. Get the popcorn out.
ECC continues to maintain the asset, as I know vendors who continue to do work there even as of this week and area getting paid. They can't really afford not to maintain it.
 
How many screens does Landmark at ECC have? Just a thought that maybe a future plan is trying to make the main movie theatre be downtown (i.e., expand Landmark,. who move a theatre to an entirely vacant space) similar to how the Galaxy Theatre (not sure if that is still the name) is in downtown Saskatoon. I presume there would be sufficient underground parking at ECC to accommodate this?
Landmark has 9 screens at ECC.

On that note: I'm a loyal ECC moviegoer, but the lack of maintenance that Landmark is putting into that facility is a bit concerning, to be quite frank. I think they would draw a better audience if they reinvested into some infrastructure upgrades.
 
It's sad to see all of the commercial developments struggle downtown, save for the Ice District. ATB Place has less than half of the original retail outlets. Rice Howard Place is almost finished, and getting retailers may be difficult. Commerce Place is busy, but there are still some vacant spaces. Manulife/National Bank has pedestrian traffic, but sparse tenants.
Much of downtown retail (not just this mall) struggled for several years during COVID when many people worked at home and seldom went to the office in the nearby towers. People have come back some in the last year or two, but retail has not much so far.

Having been here for decades, I sort of feel the last high point for downtown retail was around 2014 when the economy was doing well, there was more residential developments happening downtown and we still had some of the legacy retail to also draw some people downtown. Unfortunately, ICE District has done little or nothing to help most downtown retail, except restaurants or bars.

I sort of feel we may have hit rock bottom now after over a decade of decline in downtown retail. Sometimes when you hit rock bottom, it leads to reflection, change and improvement. I hope and feel this will lead us to more seriously deal with this issue and also consider some new and different ideas both for the mall and also for downtown retail in general.
 
I think the timing of the Ice District was interrupted with Covid, just like the other developments. The first blow to downtown seemed to happen with the drop in oil prices around 2016/17.
 
I had a recent discussion with someone who figures Holt Renfrew left because of the addition of the downtown and 102 Ave bike lanes.

Incorrect.

This was part of their overall removal of stores from 'secondary markets' as part of a new corporate strategy. Ottawa, Winnipeg all closed, with Calgary being spared because of the high amount of wealth and their significant renovation (investment). They had a press release sharing that their focus was on 'top tier' markets in Toronto, MTL, Van.
 
Could be an opportunity to double down on education. If retail isn't feasible, converting into classrooms could be a relatively low lift (e.g. Enterprise Square). That would also work well with some limited retail, food court, hotel, movie theater and public transit connections.
 
My thoughts once out of receivership:

- Consolidate remaining retail to east side. Dollarama could take prominent main floor space for example. Attract new tenants to remaining spaces, including new anchor for Sportschek
- Wall off all west area except connections to third floor, Delta Hotel, movie theatre, pedway connections. This might be difficult due to elevator and escalator locations.
- Parcel off Bay portion for redevelopment - Residential, seniors, student, etc c/w new 103 Street-facing retail.
- Look at educational (per bolo), medical, government, or other uses for remaining west portion. Not sure exciting but has works for other dying malls (Meadowlark).
 
Could be an opportunity to double down on education. If retail isn't feasible, converting into classrooms could be a relatively low lift (e.g. Enterprise Square). That would also work well with some limited retail, food court, hotel, movie theater and public transit connections.

Please no more U of A-operated downtown buildings until they figure out how to use Enterprise Square properly. It might be the DT building that frustrates me the most, based on its location, its history, and how poorly used it is by an institution that could (in theory) very easily completely change the life of that part of DT if they cared at all to do so.
 
My thoughts once out of receivership:

- Consolidate remaining retail to east side. Dollarama could take prominent main floor space for example. Attract new tenants to remaining spaces, including new anchor for Sportschek
- Wall off all west area except connections to third floor, Delta Hotel, movie theatre, pedway connections. This might be difficult due to elevator and escalator locations.
- Parcel off Bay portion for redevelopment - Residential, seniors, student, etc c/w new 103 Street-facing retail.
- Look at educational (per bolo), medical, government, or other uses for remaining west portion. Not sure exciting but has works for other dying malls (Meadowlark).
I know this might not be a popular opinion, but I think the Delta Hotel should relocate. It’s the only salvageable business on that side, and the city would be better served if it moved into a standalone building (either new or an office conversion). That would free up the west side to be transformed into something else.
 
Incorrect.

This was part of their overall removal of stores from 'secondary markets' as part of a new corporate strategy. Ottawa, Winnipeg all closed, with Calgary being spared because of the high amount of wealth and their significant renovation (investment). They had a press release sharing that their focus was on 'top tier' markets in Toronto, MTL, Van.

Thanks for insight. I didn't have that info to share but it was example of how some people figure they are 'experts' in planning and traffic engineering and it seems bike lanes being the hot button issue they are for some are to blame for the city's traffic woes and fiscal position.
 

Back
Top