That's not what this is, no. As it says directly on the notification, WSP Consulting has APPLIED for this amendment.
And if the application gets hard-tanked, then that'll be a win and I'll retract that comment.

Even so, the developer for that site wouldn't be putting the amendment forward unless they had a tacit understanding from planning. That's what has my eyebrow rising.
 
For Sale - Blatchford Residential Land
35 Airport Road NW
$740,000

The City of Edmonton is selling a fully serviced 0.54 acre parcel within the heart of the Blatchford Community. The current zoning for this site (BRH - Blatchford Row Housing) allows for a variety of residential uses, making it ideal for a row housing or multi-unit residential development. Nearby amenities include The Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT), Kingsway Centre, Kingsway Mall, and the NAIT/Blatchford Market LRT Station. The lot abuts Littlewood Park and a greenway (walkway). The central location of this site and proximity to public transit makes access to anywhere in the City highly convenient.
.
All interested parties must submit a Buyer’s Application Form to the City. If your submission is deemed acceptable, the City may contact you to further negotiate and formalize a sale agreement.

For more information, please visit the City of Edmonton Property Sales website at edmonton.ca/propertysales .


Half an acre, fully serviced for 740 is actually a pretty solid deal.

Measured it out the other day, and it looks like it would fit about nine freehold townhouses, and fronting onto the park would certainly be an interesting arrangement.

IMG_2544.jpeg
 
Measured it out the other day, and it looks like it would fit about nine freehold townhouses, and fronting onto the park would certainly be an interesting arrangement.

View attachment 683214
Not a massively flattering angle (looks like Vivarium) but that's a great lot. I hope they get offers from a developer who cares about the building facade.
 
I think Streetside was planning to build on this lot at some point... Guess the lack of interest in their current offerings changed some plans...
Their original plan was for 26, which is what they have foundations for. But their construction tied up this lot until fairly recently, much like Stratosphere's tied up the NEXT/Ecoden site.
 
Their original plan was for 26, which is what they have foundations for. But their construction tied up this lot until fairly recently, much like Stratosphere's tied up the NEXT/Ecoden site.
I thought at some point this lot was marked on the Blatchford website as a Streetside lot as well, but I could be wrong. In any event, I think this lot has a lot of potential and I am surprised nothing has happened here yet.
 
I thought at some point this lot was marked on the Blatchford website as a Streetside lot as well, but I could be wrong. In any event, I think this lot has a lot of potential and I am surprised nothing has happened here yet.
It looks like on older maps it was slated for multi-unit (eg condo) type developments rather than freehold, but all of the ones I can find have Streetside between the alley and Yorke Mews. But it's certainly possible they were considering that lot in a wait and see fashion. They did use this land for storing equipment and materials during construction.
 
Not a massively flattering angle (looks like Vivarium) but that's a great lot. I hope they get offers from a developer who cares about the building facade.
It's not a lot that's going to attract lots of interest imho. Bare bones landscaping and uninspiring cookie cutter neighboring row housing means that its entry level housing and a developer doesn't always have enough margin in the job to spend on upscaling the exterior appearance of a project.
 
It's not a lot that's going to attract lots of interest imho. Bare bones landscaping and uninspiring cookie cutter neighboring row housing means that its entry level housing and a developer doesn't always have enough margin in the job to spend on upscaling the exterior appearance of a project.
For the prices charged in this area, they might want to put a bit more work into making the exteriors more appealing. Budget style without the budget prices probably partly explains why this area is not being developed faster.
 
For the prices charged in this area, they might want to put a bit more work into making the exteriors more appealing. Budget style without the budget prices probably partly explains why this area is not being developed faster.
Traditional brickwork exteriors with modern amenities & innovative energy consumption might be a pipe dream, but it sure would make me want to buy.

1758662482517.png
 
Traditional brickwork exteriors with modern amenities & innovative energy consumption might be a pipe dream, but it sure would make me want to buy.

View attachment 683331
That's basically the first several runs of Encore houses, and all of Crimson Cove's builds. There's a lot of brick exteriors here.

Edit: Landmark and Mutti have also extensively used brick in their exteriors.
 
Last edited:
For the prices charged in this area, they might want to put a bit more work into making the exteriors more appealing. Budget style without the budget prices probably partly explains why this area is not being developed faster.
Nobody is going to argue against more appealing exteriors but builders won't throw in an exterior upgrade for nothing just like car dealers don't throw in an option on a new car for nothing. Their profit margins don't allow it. Is there anything special about the lot in question that would prompt a builder to upgrade the facade to something above the threshold minimum standard? Unfortunately, not that I can see.
 
Nobody is going to argue against more appealing exteriors but builders won't throw in an exterior upgrade for nothing just like car dealers don't throw in an option on a new car for nothing. Their profit margins don't allow it. Is there anything special about the lot in question that would prompt a builder to upgrade the facade to something above the threshold minimum standard? Unfortunately, not that I can see.
Disagree. The homes are already selling at a considerable premium, as David mentioned.

If the choice is 460k for one that looks like it's worth 200k, or 500k for something that looks premium (see most of the Edgemont developments), I don't see anyone taking the former.
 
Disagree. The homes are already selling at a considerable premium, as David mentioned.

If the choice is 460k for one that looks like it's worth 200k, or 500k for something that looks premium (see most of the Edgemont developments), I don't see anyone taking the former.
Edgemont is such an apples to oranges comparison though... You probably couldn't pay a lot of Blatchfordians to live out there. I agree that a lot of Blatchford's exteriors leave something to be desired, but the comparison should be to other central neighbourhoods, not neighbourhoods outside the Henday.
 
Edgemont is such an apples to oranges comparison though... You probably couldn't pay a lot of Blatchfordians to live out there. I agree that a lot of Blatchford's exteriors leave something to be desired, but the comparison should be to other central neighbourhoods, not neighbourhoods outside the Henday.
When talking about looks and not size, I'm not sure that the neighborhood is a factor in the potential for improvement in the facade of these buildings. For higher density, those bubble window lofts in Wihkwentowin have a fantastic street-facing side.

1758726052026.png
 

Back
Top