[CplKlinger]

It has been determined that a "faithful reconstruction" of Hanger 11 is not feasible, and the city is in the process of buying back the property so that it can be re-listed at market value.

 

[fjordgard]

It has been determined that a "faithful reconstruction" of Hanger 11 is not feasible, and the city is in the process of buying back the property so that it can be re-listed at market value.

That's an interesting piece of land... The City will save the $5 million that was committed to support the hangar redevelopment and will hopefully get a chunk of change selling the property. Unfortunate circumstances but as a taxpayer, I don't hate it.

 

[policyenthusiast]

 

[fjordgard]

View attachment 677222

So, how much has Landmark donated to Mr. Cartmell's campaign?

 

[archited]

too much and not enough!

 

[Coprolite]

The pond in Blatchford looks disgusting with all the algae in it, who wants to live in front of that? Thommyjo, I walked up that road yesterday and debated on whether I should continue and climb up the hill, I decided that it was not worth the risk of getting in trouble.
Overall, development at Blatchford this summer has been underwhelming… again!

Welcome to the Edmonton area. That's what ponds look like at the moment barring some extremely weird water chemistry, a complete lack of waterfowl, or golf course level manicuring.

 

[wormwood]

Welcome to the Edmonton area. That's what ponds look like at the moment barring some extremely weird water chemistry, a complete lack of waterfowl, or golf course level manicuring.

consider it part of the geomorphological lore of blatchford

 

[Glenco]

I don’t know if they have an aerator in that pond but if not it would help

 

[CplKlinger]

View attachment 677222

I can get opposing the rule, but halting *all* future connections is just stupid. If homebuilders want to connect, let them.

 

[fjordgard]

I can get opposing the rule, but halting *all* future connections is just stupid. If homebuilders want to connect, let them.

I wrote a couple paragraphs about what the rule is actually about and how Cartmell is misrepresenting what is happening, but decided to delete it and just let this pass through committee next week.

 

[policyenthusiast]

I wrote a couple paragraphs about what the rule is actually about and how Cartmell is misrepresenting what is happening, but decided to delete it and just let this pass through committee next week.

Same. Cartmell isn't even on the Committee, so I figured what's the point.

 

[Gus Haynes]

I wrote a couple paragraphs about what the rule is actually about and how Cartmell is misrepresenting what is happening, but decided to delete it and just let this pass through committee next week.

Cartmell? Misrepresenting material facts for cynical political gain? I am shocked! Shocked that there is gambling going on at this establishment!

 

[fjordgard]

Same. Cartmell isn't even on the Committee, so I figured what's the point.

It looks like he is the chair of the Committee, isn't he? The rest of the Committee is Paquette, Salvador, Stevenson and Teng though, so I am not concerned.

 

[policyenthusiast]

It looks like he is the chair of the Committee, isn't he? The rest of the Committee is Paquette, Salvador, Stevenson and Teng though, so I am not concerned.

You are absolutely correct. Coffee is not working this morning.

 

[Coprolite]

I don’t know if they have an aerator in that pond but if not it would help

There isn't currently an aerator. The aerator would help with some factors (dissolved CO2), but it is a drainage pond and runoff water tends to be nutrient rich. So too are the waste products of the noble Branta canadensis.