News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.7K     0 
^^^
This is for all those who hold their breath until they turn blue that infill is cheaper than greenfield because you don’t need to add system capacity for power (or water or drainage…). :)
I don't think the addition of 1300+ units within a couple blocks is typical of what people mean by 'infill.'
 
Coming to Executive Committee: A sole-source agreement (funded by the Infill Infrastructure Fund) for EPCOR to upgrade downtown electrical infrastructure to support seven(!) residential projects totalling ~1,300 units(!!!). Three projects are currently under construction, and four are proposed.
View attachment 677174
View attachment 677173
View attachment 677172
So if my math is correct:

Project A: Lotus
Project B: Lilac
Project C: Parks
Project D: Westrich Proposal
Project E: Shift
Project F: ????
Project G: Williams Hall

Sound right?
 
For 1300 dwellings, it's still far cheaper on a per unit basis.
Yeah. Idk what the gotchu is here? How many roads does 1300 greenfield homes require vs what we are building for these projects downtown?

Of course density requires upgrades to services. If 20,000 more people live downtown, there will be needs for more fire, garbage, and enforcement, transit. And yet those will all be significantly less than a 20,000 person suburb having all of those.
 
Today's trivia question for 10pts - The recently revealed original logo on the APA Coast 105st. What is it?

IMG_7958.JPG
 

The changes to how we work had the opportunity to be one of the biggest climate initiatives we could ask for and it would have been accidental.
 
"We gave the old men victory and they threw it away, we offered them a new world and they made the old one over again. Still, it might have been worse."
 

Back
Top