News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.9K     0 

Harbour Street WILL run east of Yonge when the Pinnacle buildings are finished, and will then cross Freeland & Cooper and eventually hit Downes and end at John M Tinsley. There is already a cycle track on Downes.

View attachment 659520
Wow, that would make it one of the only non-arterials to maintain the same name east and west of Yonge! I guessed it would be Downes because that's what comes up when I click the project line on TOINVIEW, but I appreciate the info!
 
Thank you for your feedback everyone. I've incorporated your suggestions @TwoWheelPoli and @UntitledCyclist - the spreadsheet now lists the streets corresponding to each project name, specifies last update is from TOINview and which projects are by developers, with a few data updates. Some of the street spans have many entries, so the format is Street Affected Start Point End Point, with segments separated by commas. Some of the later NA entries may also have the roadwork timeline on TOINview but I didn't include it if it omitted that bike lanes were being put in. I will review the rest later but I also updated the St Clair TMP with 2024-2027 as it is also an infrastructure enhancement by Metrolinx. I was not able to find links for every project's webpage.
View attachment 659544

Just updated my tracker file to show Hallam Street as completed in 2025, as well as identified some of the bikeways that could be done this year. If any of you see any projects get completed this year before I get to them, by all means ping me. ;)
 
I wonder if @TwoWheelPoli involved himself in this at all:


Its a tender for major resurfacing and reconstruction of Winona Drive from Vaughan to Eglinton.

Two-Wheel was instrumental in getting cycling infra. put in here.

I saw cyclists making good use of this when I was reviewing Laughin Park for @Johnny Au over in the Problematic Park Design thread, here: https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threa...n-why-some-parks-dont-work.32075/post-2246280

I didn't post the photo of that in that thread as it was off-point, but here, it fits.

DSC05466.JPG
 
I wonder if @TwoWheelPoli involved himself in this at all:


Its a tender for major resurfacing and reconstruction of Winona Drive from Vaughan to Eglinton.

Two-Wheel was instrumental in getting cycling infra. put in here.

I saw cyclists making good use of this when I was reviewing Laughin Park for @Johnny Au over in the Problematic Park Design thread, here: https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threa...n-why-some-parks-dont-work.32075/post-2246280

I didn't post the photo of that in that thread as it was off-point, but here, it fits.

View attachment 659904
oh my lord, this is so badly needed. It's among the worst bike-laned streets I've seen, though Palmerston south of College is up there. Brunswick north of Bloor too, and those are more heavily used routes.

I admit I didn't realize the city had to (or does) put out tenders for every street/bike lane resurfacing job. Is that because it's outside of state of good repair work, or does that all go through the same tendering process too? Seems awfully inefficient.
 
oh my lord, this is so badly needed. It's among the worst bike-laned streets I've seen, though Palmerston south of College is up there. Brunswick north of Bloor too, and those are more heavily used routes.

I admit I didn't realize the city had to (or does) put out tenders for every street/bike lane resurfacing job. Is that because it's outside of state of good repair work, or does that all go through the same tendering process too? Seems awfully inefficient.

Its that entire stretch of road, not just the cycling infra.

The marker for tender is scale and $.

Smaller projects are bundled other minor works contracts
 
Screen Shot 2025-06-18 at 5.12.12 PM.png


Am I missing any planned improvement to these gaps along Blue Jays Way?

The Wellington lanes are real success for Toronto bike infrastructure. Unfortunately, the primary route south to meet the Wellington lanes' eastern terminus is Peter, which has terrible bike lanes. Then south of King, on Blue Jays Way, the lanes disappear altogether for the last block to Wellington.

At Wellington, cyclists have to make a very awkward right with no paint or signal guidance to access the south-side contraflow to head west. Pedestrians often throng both E-W and N-S crossings making right-turns very hard.

Staying on BJW, below Wellington, the poor bike lanes return but end again a block before Spadina. Once again, a potential connector stops short. Ideally this lane would continue across Spadina onto Iceboat Terrace, or perhaps down Navy Wharf to Bremner and across to Fort York to connect to Dan Leckie and the Waterfront. Google has some dotted green routes along some of these, but in reality there is no city bike infrastructure, just potential routes.

Screen Shot 2025-06-18 at 5.57.48 PM.png


There is a connecting trail under Spadina at the "Northern Linear Park" but it's not a marked bike route, and is more of a walking path.

I don't see anything addressing these gaps in the 2025-27 plans, though I know Wellington is planned to be extended west to York. To me, Peter/Blue Jays Way is a mess, but it's a nearly natural southern extension of St. George/Beverley that should repaved, and properly laned all the way south to Spadina. The connection between Beverley and Peter should also be improved. Soho is the easiest way to connect the two, but it's currently terrible with a 10 second green to get across the dogleg at Queen.
 
Its that entire stretch of road, not just the cycling infra.

The marker for tender is scale and $.

Smaller projects are bundled other minor works contracts
It is indeed the entire stretch of road, especially north of Belvidere, not shown in your picture. Of course they aren't just going to repave the bike lane. The damage is especially impactful to cyclists as the northbound contraflow lane contains the worst of it.

I actually tend to face oncoming traffic or go up on the sidewalk rather than use that bit of lane.
 
View attachment 659965

Am I missing any planned improvement to these gaps along Blue Jays Way?

The Wellington lanes are real success for Toronto bike infrastructure. Unfortunately, the primary route south to meet the Wellington lanes' eastern terminus is Peter, which has terrible bike lanes. Then south of King, on Blue Jays Way, the lanes disappear altogether for the last block to Wellington.

At Wellington, cyclists have to make a very awkward right with no paint or signal guidance to access the south-side contraflow to head west. Pedestrians often throng both E-W and N-S crossings making right-turns very hard.

Staying on BJW, below Wellington, the poor bike lanes return but end again a block before Spadina. Once again, a potential connector stops short. Ideally this lane would continue across Spadina onto Iceboat Terrace, or perhaps down Navy Wharf to Bremner and across to Fort York to connect to Dan Leckie and the Waterfront. Google has some dotted green routes along some of these, but in reality there is no city bike infrastructure, just potential routes.

View attachment 659987

There is a connecting trail under Spadina at the "Northern Linear Park" but it's not a marked bike route, and is more of a walking path.

I don't see anything addressing these gaps in the 2025-27 plans, though I know Wellington is planned to be extended west to York. To me, Peter/Blue Jays Way is a mess, but it's a nearly natural southern extension of St. George/Beverley that should repaved, and properly laned all the way south to Spadina. The connection between Beverley and Peter should also be improved. Soho is the easiest way to connect the two, but it's currently terrible with a 10 second green to get across the dogleg at Queen.

Upgrading what's there, in terms of cycling infra on Peter/Blue Jays way, where it already exists, will happen to at least some degree this year, with Critical Interim Repair. (I don't know the extent of the work)

Further work will await full reconstruction of Peter/Blue Jays Way which is due in 2030/2031 currently.
 
Ok.... a bit of digging later...... (err, w/some assistance) ;)

View attachment 660013
View attachment 660014

View attachment 660015

From here:


I e-mailed Councillor Malik about the missing bike lane and the awful pavement condition on Peter and Blue Jays Way last October and eventually got this response, which I may have posted in this thread then:

"
Bearcat,

Thank you for reaching out. As Councillor Malik Office has advised below, Peters Street/ Blue Jays Way between Richmond St and Front St is tentatively planned for Critical Interim Repairs in 2025 but is still subject to coordination with other construction activities, available funding and competing priorities. There are a few conflicts on the corridor including Toronto Water work, but we are hoping the conflicts can be resolved.

Critical Interim Repairs are intended to provide immediate improvements to the road surface condition and maintain the road until more extensive rehabilitation efforts can be included within the Transportation Services Capital Works Program.

As part of Critical Interim Repairs, installation of existing pavement markings and bikeway barriers to current standards is included as part of the work. This includes repainting of the bikeways within the entire project.

In January 2019, City Council authorized maintaining Peter Street cycle tracks between King Street and Queen Street as a permanent installation: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2019.IE1.5. In June2019, City Council authorized bicycle lanes between King Street and Navy’s Wharf : https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134711.pdf. The block between King Street and Wellington Street bike lanes were not installed due to development hoardings, which have only been removed earlier this year.

At the time of the Critical Interim Repair, the Peter Street’s cycle track markings and barriers will be upgraded to today’s standard, but Blue Jays Way will remain as painted bike lanes. The missing block of bike lanes will also be installed. After installation, staff can monitor the new bike lanes and if desired, can bring forward recommendations to upgrade the bike lanes to cycle tracks to City Council.

Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Best,
Becky


Becky Katz (she/her)

Manager, Operations and Maintenance

Transportation Services

City of Toronto"
 
I wonder if @TwoWheelPoli involved himself in this at all:


Its a tender for major resurfacing and reconstruction of Winona Drive from Vaughan to Eglinton.

Two-Wheel was instrumental in getting cycling infra. put in here.

I saw cyclists making good use of this when I was reviewing Laughin Park for @Johnny Au over in the Problematic Park Design thread, here: https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threa...n-why-some-parks-dont-work.32075/post-2246280

I didn't post the photo of that in that thread as it was off-point, but here, it fits.

View attachment 659904
Sorry to disappoint you, but haven't taken much of a look at construction bids as of late. Having said that, I used to ride Winona on occasion and feel the biggest weakness is how it connects to Marlee (which council of course hit the pause button on recently).
 
Sorry to disappoint you, but haven't taken much of a look at construction bids as of late. Having said that, I used to ride Winona on occasion and feel the biggest weakness is how it connects to Marlee (which council of course hit the pause button on recently).
So, the whole situation is complicated, because yes, the lanes on Marlee are paused, but the city is currently reconfiguring the Marlee/Eglinton/Winona intersection with moving lights and adding bike signals. So there's that bit of positive news!

PXL_20250618_142958930.jpg
 

Back
Top