thommyjo
Senior Member
Clearing snow based on the “type” instead of the route makes 0 sense to me.Here is update on $100 million Accelerated Active Transportation Network Expansion (2023-26).
$73 million spent so far.
35.5km constructed to date in 2024 and 2025.
71km - total expected to be completed with the $100 million (this is reduction in total km from initial plan due to higher costs). Note: new snow removal equipment was also purchased with this money (didn't receive total cost of that).
2025 projects: 18 of 24 projects completed (72%) for a total of 18.1km. Remaining projects will be completed in 2026. These uncompleted projects are part of the $73million spent so far.
For the final $27 million
2026: 16 routes planned for a total of 25km + 6 unfinished projects from 2025 such as Kingsway Ave and Victoria Park Rd (again the 2025 projects are already contracted and money allocated as part of $73million spent so far)
2027: 107 Avenue project + unfinished projects from 2026
Snow removal:
Priority 1 (protected routes) within 24hr clearance
Priority 2 (new multi-use paths) within 72 hours
New: city will 'look at' clearing the 2025 local street bikeway routes as pilot
Clearing snow of new routes is posing a challenge because many routes transition from protected, to MUP, to shared street, back to protected or MUP etc - all with different priority clearance guidelines and different equipment needs.
I’ve been harping on the city for YEARS about 102ave. It’s a bike lane from downtown till 126st, but then becomes a MUP after groat road. But 80% of riders using that route at 124st have come from west of groat. Yet 127-136st they treat as 3 day MUP priority and not 24hr priority.
Beyond stupid. Would take less than 30min to just go all the way down to where the route stops.
Also, MUPs actually need higher priority than bike lanes IMO as pedestrians more quickly cause the paths to be dangerous from snow pack and the impact of freeze thaw from walked on paths is worse.




