IanO
Superstar
Likely tomorrow.
|
|
|
- Thread starter fromyeg
- Start date
TAS
Senior Member
Hearing continues Sept 15.
IanO
Superstar
We were there until 9:30pm and I must thank Council and certainly all of admin for the incredibly long day (s).
TAS
Senior Member
Seemed like there were a fair amount of public speakers in opposition but that they would be supportive of a reduced height to 14 or so storeys.
fromyeg
Active Member
There seemed to be some sort of procedural problem. I don’t know the details.
It was referred back to administration for further consultation.
IanO
Superstar
An unfortunate turn of events due to a procedural error within a public hearing.
Alas.
---
3.31 Bylaw 21266 - To allow for medium and large scale mixed use development, Windsor Park
The following member of Administration's delegation answered questions: J. Johnson, Employee and Legal Services
Moved by: M. Janz Seconded by: A. Stevenson
That Bylaw 21266 be referred back to Administration and return to a futureCity Council Public Hearing.Due Date: To be determined, City Council Public Hearing
In Favour (11): T. Cartmell, S. Hamilton, M. Janz, A. Knack, A. Paquette,K. Principe, E. Rutherford, A. Salvador, A. Stevenson, K. Tang, and J.Wright
Alas.
---
3.31 Bylaw 21266 - To allow for medium and large scale mixed use development, Windsor Park
The following member of Administration's delegation answered questions: J. Johnson, Employee and Legal Services
Moved by: M. Janz Seconded by: A. Stevenson
That Bylaw 21266 be referred back to Administration and return to a futureCity Council Public Hearing.Due Date: To be determined, City Council Public Hearing
In Favour (11): T. Cartmell, S. Hamilton, M. Janz, A. Knack, A. Paquette,K. Principe, E. Rutherford, A. Salvador, A. Stevenson, K. Tang, and J.Wright
MacLac
Senior Member
What does this mean? Layman terms please Ian....
IanO
Superstar
See you in a few months.
Gus Haynes
Active Member
What was the procedural error and who committed it?