kEiThZ
Superstar
Any guesses?
My guess is. "We're launching the Toronto-Kitchener-London-Windsor HFR study today. In the meantime, please enjoy two more trains per day."
Given that the Northern Line operates at only 50% (1 out of 2 daily trains) and the Southern Line at 40% (2 out of 5 daily trains) compared to pre-covid schedules, I highly doubt there will be any additional frequencies announced, as it would simply be an ordinary service resumption, just like VIA has done more than a half-dozen times (June 3rd, 2020 on TOM, July 14th on QMO, September 1st across the Corridor, September 11 on TOM, April 1st, 2021 on Corridor East, May 17th on TOM and June 12th on Corridor East) without any accompanying federal communications. Restoring 85 and 88 and extending it back to Sarnia would be a different thing, but it would be a very suspicious timing and a break with a decade-long tradition of the feds controling VIA's funding while letting VIA figure out what changes in frequencies allow them to stay within the prescribed funding envelope...Any guesses?
My guess is. "We're launching the Toronto & Kitchener-London-Windsor HFR study today. In the meantime, please enjoy two more trains per day."
With faster speeds on the northern corridor how much faster can you get from Union to London through Kitchener instead of using the Dundas sub?Given that the Northern Line operates at only 50% (1 out of 2 daily trains) and the Southern Line at 40% (2 out of 5 daily trains) compared to pre-covid schedules, I highly doubt there will be any additional frequencies announced, as it would simply be an ordinary service resumption, just like VIA has done more than a half-dozen times (June 3rd, 2020 on TOM, July 14th on QMO, September 1st across the Corridor, September 11 on TOM, April 1st, 2021 on Corridor East, May 17th on TOM and June 12th on Corridor East) without any accompanying federal communications. Restoring 85 and 88 and extending it back to Sarnia would be a different thing, but it would be a very suspicious timing and a break with a decade-long tradition of the feds controling VIA's funding without dictating any changes in frequencies...
I did quite an extensive (but still strictly amateurish) comparative analysis of the Dundas and Guelph corridors in one of my very first posts in this forum:With faster speeds on the northern corridor how much faster can you get from Union to London through Kitchener instead of using the Dundas sub?
North Route 3:21
South route 2:19
Would be be possible to make it a 30min or 15 Mon difference?
Since they can travel through Guelph at 80km instead of 30kmph?
I thought that the construction on the underpass already started.^I would not focus on Guelph. There are speed improvements possible all along the line. West of Stratford, VIA travels at an embarassing 65 km/hr.
There's no technical reason why the Kitchener-Stratford-London stretch can't be upgraded to the same quality as the Smiths Falls or Alexandria lines. The cost would not be unreasonable. The result would be time competitive or possibly better than the southern route. Higher frequencies would be possible, without approaching HFR.
However, investing in a line that VIA doesn't control brings the same challenges and uncertainties.
Metrolinx needs to finish its siding installations east of Kitchener before any meaningful service upgrade could happen.
And then there is the Silver-Bramalea stretch. Without getting shovels in the ground there, it's a very significant chokepoint.
- Paul
I thought that the construction on the underpass already started.
Not that traffic between Scarborough and Oshawa is any better but there are ways around it.Sorry, which underpass?
As I understand it, ML recently released a Business Case comparing the options of a flyover or a flat crossing at Silver. But no construction procurement as yet. Similarly, ML is firming up plans to add a third track at Brampton, but that's also still at the design stage.
I believe Guelph (and Acton?) will get pedestrian tunnels and a 2-track platform, but that's not as serious a choke point. The siding additions are said to be near the end of design but no procurement activity as yet.
I totally agree with your observation about highway congestion. I am more frustrated about the lack of action on Toronto-Kitchener-London train service than about things east of Toronto, and that's saying something. Anyone who takes the 401 will see the business case for better rail service first hand. It's already a problem.
- Paul
No, at the front of the train behind the loco's. You expecting the train to be pushed to Montreal?? If so, that will be a very slow ride with CN jump up and down as it delaying their trains.So on the way back to Montreal the baggage car is at the back of the train?
No.No, at the front of the train behind the loco's. You expecting the train to be pushed to Montreal?? If so, that will be a very slow ride with CN jump up and down as it delaying their trains.
When the new trains go into service, its possible that there will be power at both end and other can speak better on this than me.
The following consist (of the train currently parked in Halifax) has been shared elsewhere:No.
So forward facing until it gets close to Halifax with locomotives infront with baggage car trailing.
Backs the train into Halifax so now the baggage car is at the opposite end of the locomotives.
So it goes to Montreal this way?
There are no new trains for the ocean, yet.




