Hamilton seriously needs an update to the Google Earth imagery. That Beasley police station was built like 5 years ago. And as of now, the towers would be completely obstructed by 75 James in the last rendering. Why do we still have such outdated imagery?

google doesn't update smaller cities quite as regularly, but Hamilton is due for some updated 3D for sure. I imagine it'll happen soonish. Current 3D imagery is from 2018.

For comparison, Toronto is 2021.
Google? Well there's yer problem. Install yer Apple Maps and get yer superior. more-up-t'date imagery.

42
 
A few thoughts.

1) If the law provided the appropriate avenue, I would require the current and former owner's to split the cost of completely reconstructing the Tivoli as-was, give or take any accessibility improvements. Demolition by neglect should never be rewarded.

What a loss:

1731533357571.jpeg

Credit/Source: https://www.talkingwallsphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/tivoli-theatre-hamilton-6-2-1.jpg

2) The Sky Bridge element does nothing for me, I don't see it as added value, just added cost. Save the $$ and put it into better materiality.

3) I take it from the render that the intent is either to save or recreate the original facade.

Looking at the below.......I feel like the render suggests a very bad recreation.

1731533526469.png

Source: https://www.doorsopenontario.on.ca/events/hamilton-1/tivoli-theatre/Tivoli-Theatre-exterior.jpg
 
Last edited:
Of course it does - its just a half-assed "tribute" to the facade, most likely made out of foam like the one they "recreated" across from capri.. smh..

I don't see the recreation happening - these people will torpedo the theatre themselves just to not have to do it. You can expect another mysterious "collapse" - they're probably pissed it's taking so long to do it on its own.
 
From the City today:

Heritage Permit Application for 108 James Street North and 111-113 Hughson Street North, Hamilton

TAKE NOTICE that, on January 22, 2025, the Council of the City of Hamilton consented to Heritage Permit Application HP2024-033, subject to conditions, for the Demolition of the Tivoli Lobby and Auditorium at 108 James Street North and 111 -113 Hughson Street North, Hamilton, under Section 34(4.2)(c) of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Dated this 31st day of January, 2025.

Matthew Trennum
City Clerk
Hamilton, Ontario

 
 
As Joey says, straight outta the playbook. They’re fumbling the 2020s edition, though- the King St buildings at least fell ‘on their own’.

Good luck trying to do anything here without the OLT now. This is so blatant that it must be the plan- no chance they’d try to fulfill city conditions after this.
 
As Joey says, straight outta the playbook. They’re fumbling the 2020s edition, though- the King St buildings at least fell ‘on their own’.

Good luck trying to do anything here without the OLT now. This is so blatant that it must be the plan- no chance they’d try to fulfill city conditions after this.

It was sadly inevitable, given the length of time the theatre sat there with no maintenance. Kroetsch can bellow about credibility, but I think the city is as much to blame here. So I think any "remedies" he can find should start with having tougher policies and penalties. But inexcusable that the developer didn't have a permit, despite the city approving demolition at the beginning of the year.

More sad is this probably won't be the last case of neglect causing something to collapse or needing to be demolished.
 
It was sadly inevitable, given the length of time the theatre sat there with no maintenance. Kroetsch can bellow about credibility, but I think the city is as much to blame here. So I think any "remedies" he can find should start with having tougher policies and penalties. But inexcusable that the developer didn't have a permit, despite the city approving demolition at the beginning of the year.

More sad is this probably won't be the last case of neglect causing something to collapse or needing to be demolished.
Agreed, it is sad.

I don’t know what higher-profile ones remain. This and the King buildings have been known for over a decade.

I also don’t know what we expect the city to do in this case other than enforce heritage standards; that is an ongoing issue. At a certain point if a municipality can’t fulfill its heritage responsibilities the province should step in. These were all designated properties, protected by provincial legislation… might be time I brush up on the Act.
 
Is there a plan to include a live theater venue in the new condo tower here?
 

Back
Top