I am not dissing your source here, but she may not be aware it's not as simple as turning on a light switch. To be fair though, probably a lot of peeps in that field are not really aware of that either. Most likely due that landlords usually have no intentions of converting their properties into condos.

Oh, it's all good. I'm pretty hard to offend. 😅

I didn't mean to imply it's "easy" by any means. I believe the property manager meant how much more simple it is to change a condo to a rental "pre-construction" and "pre-sale". I updated that in my original post as a clarification as it could be confusing.

As for new rental buildings to condos. I just mean the way these new rental buildings (the ones with in-suite laundry, in-suite meters, etc) are clearly built in such a way where they could transition them to condos far more easily than much older rental buildings could be. From what I see, living in one right now, they are largely condos in anything but name and what the legal definition is.

Hilariously, I've had a friend over who took a look around and literally said to me "Do you own this place?" I told him that this is a rental building. He hasn't rented in decades and got a good chuckle out of "How far rental buildings have come". Then he asked me all the usual questions, like electricity, water, etc all being metered in-suite, etc. "So it is a condo. Just not sold". 😁
 
Can the developer not build the building as a condo, register it, and simply own all of the condos, making it a rental building with the flexibility to sell the units in the future?
 

Back
Top