It's being done because the original crystal architecture frankly has underperformed programmatically (or even failed if one wishes to be harsher about the amount of remedial work being done on what would have been considered an 'untouchable' piece of art).

The main staircase in it was designed to be used as sort of display for artefacts.

Unfortunately, I find the ROM to be underwhelming these days overall.

The artefacts and displays haven't changed much in 20 years while the costs have gone up.

The special exhibitions are also underwhelming. I went to the immersive earth exhibition recently and was left scratching my head.

I considered getting a ROM membership but it's not really worth it. You don't even get a tax receipt for the membership like you would with the curators circle.
 
IMG_5772.jpeg
IMG_5773.jpeg
 
An interesting little side story.

I doubt these are missing, likely mislabeled or never existed to begin with - still, it makes me wonder if more of the ROM's collection should be out on rotating display rather than everything being seemingly static.

ROM can't account for 2,234 items in its collection, including 10 missing harpoons​

The Royal Ontario Museum's thousands of missing items could stock a respectable museum on their own.
he Royal Ontario Museum cannot account for 2,234 items that are supposed to be in its collections, documents released under access-to-information laws show.

The missing items are wildly varied and could stock a respectable museum on their own.

For instance, 136 oracle bones are among the missing antiquities.

Oracle bones were used to try to foresee the future in medieval China. Questions would be carved or painted on a bone, often a turtle shell, then it would be heated. The way in which the heat cracked the bone was interpreted as an answer to the question.

Also missing: 10 harpoons; a nativity scene; two “shabtis,” figurines found in ancient Egyptian tombs; and seven “undetermined objects” — which seem likely to remain undetermined.

TorontoToday asked how 10 harpoons could go missing.

"I guess if we knew how they went missing, they wouldn't be missing," said Leela Outcalt, the ROM's chief of collections care.

Across the ROM's art and culture collections, about one item in 250 is unaccounted for.
Outcault said the quantity of missing items stems from the inventory practices the ROM used in the past, informal by modern standards.

Some of the museum’s methods of accounting for objects reflect the systems used when they were first acquired generations ago, she explained. This can lead to confusing problems in the present.

"It's not uncommon to end up with a situation where you have two numbers that are attributed to what appear to be the same object, and you then have a four-month research project ahead of you to weed through the documentation and ensure that you have the correct piece aligned with the correct number.”


"In 1915, when people went out into the field and did archaeological digs, it was a different world, and people were bringing things back by the truckload. And we're still dealing with the results of that today.”

The ROM was founded in 1912 as the merger of five separate museums run by the University of Toronto. In the 1920s, it inherited about 44,000 objects from a teachers’ college, which Outcalt described as “poorly documented.”

“When the school shut down and the over 44,000 works were transferred, records were created from ledger books, without confirming one-to-one relationships with the objects themselves,” she said in a written response.

The museum didn’t introduce a uniform, consistent tracking system for objects until 1948.
Quantities of historic clothing are also missing. These include 40 dresses, 24 skirts, 11 belts, 10 coats, four waistcoats and three underskirts.

Outcalt said clothing and textiles used to be kept track of much more informally by museums than they are now.

"They weren't understood in the same way that we understand collections of objects today. People could bring in, say, bed hangings and then repurpose those bed hangings to cover a chair. Sometimes historic textiles were repurposed to incorporate in decorative arts rooms and the like."

The list of missing items includes a number of objects that may have Indigenous significance, such as four wearing blankets, three moccasins, two headdress fragments, two kamik boots and two worked bones, as well as a wampum, wampum string, rattle, parka and toboggan.

The items’ object numbers show some batches of missing objects were acquired at the same time.

Most of the now-missing oracle bones were acquired together in 1931, while a group of 21 missing photographs all arrived at the museum in 1940.


TorontoToday requested further information on 30 missing coins from the museum's collection.

These turned out to include a group of 19 coins found in an archaeological dig in Jerusalem, studied in 1985, but found missing during an inventory conducted in 2014.

"We're talking less than $20 per coin," Outcalt said of their value. "These are very, very common. In terms of the concerns around this being something going on to the black market, that's unlikely."

A 17th-century Japanese coin in the inventory of missing items could be more valuable, however.

"That is something that we need to explore further and will — but it's really hard, because there's very little documentation on it."
 
Toronto is outdoing itself here.

Not only do we 'Frankenstein' new architecture on to old buildings.

But now we also Frankenstein even newer architecture on to the new architecture that's frankensteined on to the old buidling.

Looking forward, in another 17 years or so, to seeing what is being built now, then partially demolished to graph yet another thing on top of it too.

And so on and so on...

;)
Woah, that's like, totally Meta dude!

Maybe this will be competing with the YEC for frankentecture. Or even the base of the CN tower with that piece of rubble thats supposed to be the aquarium.
 
Woah, that's like, totally Meta dude!

Maybe this will be competing with the YEC for frankentecture. Or even the base of the CN tower with that piece of rubble thats supposed to be the aquarium.
hawc's bang-on description makes me wonder if my long-ago observation about the building being akin to a garish trophy wife requiring constant upgrades in her nips-and-tucks has finally been realized.
 
Anything as high profile, unique, and important as the ROM is going to be modified again and again over time. I'm not sure why that's suddenly a surprise, nor why change here is being ridiculed in principle. As cities grow, so do their repositories for their treasures.

I get that the Libeskind crystal is the springboard for the derision. Its deconstructivist form is jarring: that's inherent in the style, it's meant to be that way. So different from how we normally build, so different from the rest of the museum, it's meant to catch attention, to stake a claim on beyond-local-landmark status, and to spark discussion. The discussion, like most surrounding controversial subjects/objects, tends towards black and white with little acknowledgement of gray areas.

What's going on now, though, is really in the realm of the gray area. It's not a demolition of the crystal; even if some of its cladding is being stripped away, and even if there are tweaks to the interior layout, the crystal's structural components are staying in place. What's happening is the addressing of what are considered deficiencies, especially to create a more inviting ground realm both outside and in. That's natural. We identify issues over time, and when we can, we correct them. No big surprise!

42
 
Anything as high profile, unique, and important as the ROM is going to be modified again and again over time. I'm not sure why that's suddenly a surprise, nor why change here is being ridiculed in principle. As cities grow, so do their repositories for their treasures.

I get that the Libeskind crystal is the springboard for the derision. Its deconstructivist form is jarring: that's inherent in the style, it's meant to be that way. So different from how we normally build, so different from the rest of the museum, it's meant to catch attention, to stake a claim on beyond-local-landmark status, and to spark discussion. The discussion, like most surrounding controversial subjects/objects, tends towards black and white with little acknowledgement of gray areas.

What's going on now, though, is really in the realm of the gray area. It's not a demolition of the crystal; even if some of its cladding is being stripped away, and even if there are tweaks to the interior layout, the crystal's structural components are staying in place. What's happening is the addressing of what are considered deficiencies, especially to create a more inviting ground realm both outside and in. That's natural. We identify issues over time, and when we can, we correct them. No big surprise!

42

Agreed with all of the above, except that I think many feel the deficiencies in the Libeskind design were pretty obvious to many from pre-construction. (Particularly the interior layout issues). I think there's also the sense, fair or not, that the exterior didn't live up to the hype.

An ongoing issue for ROM is that this latest set of changes still doesn't really address how deficient they are in display space (ft2) relative to their collection size. I think this latest effort is quite solid, but there is a case to be made for a bigger vision, and a much bigger budget, that might, arguably let the thing settle for a couple of generations.
 
^It's still nips-and-tucks of the trophy husband or whatever though... >.<
 
Not an update for construction, but a little bit of appreciation for the back of the ROM along Philosopher's Walk. This is the sort of brickwork we need more of in this city 😍
View attachment 636120View attachment 636121
I love Philosopher's Walk so much. Quite underutilized, imo, outside of U of T students.

U of T once had grand dreams for Philosopher's Walk for daylighting Taddle Creek.

On closer examination, however, that was ruled out as the creek water is fully intermingled with the sanitary sewers in the area, and unscrambling that egg was way out of budget/scope.

***

A revised plan was then concocted that included a shadow creek, (river rock following the low points in PW, where drainage occurs). Along w/that, the gates at Bloor were to be restored, new lighting, pavers
and seating, and a sort of amphitheater space near the midpoint.

That was mostly done, though the shadow creek was poorly executed, it should have drained the roofs from the Conservatory, ROM, The Faculty of Music, Varsity Arena etc to get a bit of flow, at least after a rainfall, and should have had some wet loving plants along its route.

To gain greater usage there was an idea to create an E-W path (well it's there) but one that felt cohesive with the PW design and appealing for walking, that would connect Devonshire in the west to Avenue Road in the east.

That idea was never fully realized.

I would have liked to see a small bit of naturalization, by the Conservatory and at the low point by Music/Law that would give you memories of the ravine once there. Leave the lawn elsewhere for sitting/tanning etc.
 
Agreed with all of the above, except that I think many feel the deficiencies in the Libeskind design were pretty obvious to many from pre-construction. (Particularly the interior layout issues). I think there's also the sense, fair or not, that the exterior didn't live up to the hype.
It's also a lot of money being put into fixing these apparent flaws.
An ongoing issue for ROM is that this latest set of changes still doesn't really address how deficient they are in display space (ft2) relative to their collection size. I think this latest effort is quite solid, but there is a case to be made for a bigger vision, and a much bigger budget, that might, arguably let the thing settle for a couple of generations.
Given the site constraints, it's maybe an argument for disentangling the ROM's collection with a new branch of the ROM at the Ontario Science Centre. It could even be set up relatively quickly too!

Now to find a billionaire for this endeavor...

I love Philosopher's Walk so much. Quite underutilized, imo, outside of U of T students.
It's quite lush but some of the buildings around it are not so good. I.e. the Edward Johnson Building presents a blank grey face to the Walk (not even any texture or greenery beyond lawn to soften it up). I wish that the ROM also opened up a bit more onto the Walk itself, though I do understand the inherent security concerns.

1741844300803.png
 
Last edited:

Back
Top