RickyBobby
Active Member
Yes.what local architect has? Adamson?
Yes.what local architect has? Adamson?
True, similar but that one was a bit different. It was basically a giant suspended scaffold system that was hung from the roof and was lowered down on hoists. Similar for sure.First Canadian reclad!
Did you read the documents? Construction will resume as normal.
I mean it's kinda like one of those movies or even a series you see on Netflix you really enjoy...if you try not to think too hard about it. Where the logistics of it tend to spoil your experience of it...So let me get this straight: they are going to try to sell the remaining units, in this market, with these interest rates, with all the negative press, and the stench of "receivership" and the prospect of legal claims and liens and maybe the building not being completed as designed?
(sorry for bringing up real estate again. But I wanted to have some fun. And let's face it: if they do not get buyers, financing is less likely. And it is difficult to complete a building without money.)
With the specialized construction, my assumption is that tearing down what's currently there to build something else would be far more expensive than tearing down just any standard building. And selling a property with a half-completed building on it is gonna be problematic as well, regardless of location.To be clear - this building is likely going to lose a f***ton of money for its shareholders. Right now they are focused on minimizing those losses.
A completed building is ultimately worth more than a half-built hulking mass of concrete, which is why they are pushing forwards. Will they find the cash to reach the finish line? We’ll have to see.
if they did halt construction and sell, the purchaser would likely implement a similar plan using the existing structure, particularly given its advanced state. Think about how Concord and Pemberton are basically just building Cresford's failed buildings, and those were at far earlier stages in construction.With the specialized construction, my assumption is that tearing down what's currently there to build something else would be far more expensive than tearing down just any standard building. And selling a property with a half-completed building on it is gonna be problematic as well, regardless of location.
This is not The Stump; this is much, much further along.
The construction style might be a bit of an albatross then; a bit more expensive than most might want to pay for scooping up something on a firesale.if they did halt construction and sell, the purchaser would likely implement a similar plan using the existing structure, particularly given its advanced state. Think about how Concord and Pemberton are basically just building Cresford's failed buildings, and those were at far earlier stages in construction.