[zuzivalente]

 

[xmyth_]

 

[xmyth_]

 

[rdaner]

Taken 26 September.

 

[ImmenselyMental]

From yesterday; the project site is quite narrow in width considering its height:

 

[ImmenselyMental]

From this afternoon, rising in front of The Goode:

 

[xmyth_]

 

[xmyth_]

 

[rdaner]

Taken 22 October.

 

[rdaner]

Taken 5 November.

 

[xmyth_]

Kinda feel bad for the folks on both podiums who will just be staring into one another’s condo

 

[zuzivalente]

 

[xmyth_]

Was struck by how the sun found the Gardiner sign. For a minute I thought Subway had put up a billboard.

 

[Northern Light]

@Paclo

Minor Variance Application submitted to C of A here.

The proponent would like to add a further 5 storeys to the building now going up.

Application Details

www.toronto.ca

From the above:

Now, here's something for @ProjectEnd

Lanterra had an Elevator Traffic Analysis done in relation to the addition.

From said document:

 

[DSCToronto]

@Paclo

Minor Variance Application submitted to C of A here.

The proponent would like to add a further 5 storeys to the building now going up.

Application Details

www.toronto.ca

From the above:

View attachment 610798

Now, here's something for @ProjectEnd

Lanterra had an Elevator Traffic Analysis done in relation to the addition.

From said document:


View attachment 610799
View attachment 610800

Without getting into the specifics of THIS application, I really do not think adding significant height to a recently approved development should be allowed. In most cases, height and density are the big 'asks' from developers and community and City approvals balance these with what is offered by having a new building, new homes and, maybe, community benefits. Having reached some sort of compromise it seems unreasonable that one side can return to ask for more - from an unelected and not very representative group. (The C of A).