Just because the previous situation was demonstrably bad, doesn't mean people aren't allowed to point out the flaws of what succeeded it. And also you don't really need to live in area or actually use the line to know which form of transportation should have replaced it, ridership data etc all shows that the Eglinton corridor, specifically on the eastern portion would have greatly benefited from being underground as opposed to it's current configuration, or better yet had the whole line as a subway to begin with. But all is said and done at this point, and all we can do about it is improve what we have currently and maybe sometimes think about what life could have been had the people in charge of the project made the right decisions, I'm just not a fan of this idea of "hey you don't use the line, don't criticize it" as it shuns out a lot of valid points that even people in the neighbourhood who use the shiny new toy have to come to grips with.