I think the intent is not to make TH more 'take-out friendly' but to make them less 'sit in all day and night' friendly.
People would still more likely order out under those circumstances. And to allow as many people to do that would be to remove seating so they can pack them in there more readily. No chairs and tables to get in the way...

...of course, this will lead to being less all day and night friendly. But to the TH executive, people are more of a paying commodity than potential customers. Thusly, treated like cattle with money. And /sigh...
 
From owners GWL Realty Advisors:

College Park 100: GWLRA launches a new visioning exercise for Toronto's iconic College Park, with an eye towards a major transformation
Celebrated local design firms Hariri Pontarini Architects, PUBLIC WORK and ERA Architects will lead efforts to realize the unfinished Art Moderne landmark’s full potential​
February 19, 2025 (Toronto, ON) — In 2030, College Park will celebrate a century since it became a beacon of Art Moderne architecture and Art Deco interior design at Yonge and College Streets. In anticipation of this major milestone, the building’s owner GWL Real Estate Advisors (GWLRA) is launching College Park 100, an event series and website dedicated to exploring the unfinished icon’s past and future as a team of top local architects, heritage experts and urban designers work with the City of Toronto to formalize a design vision.​
This new phase in College Park’s history is in early stages. Toronto-based ERA Architects, which oversaw the restoration of College Park’s grand, seventh-floor event space The Carlu two decades ago, will lead the heritage architecture restoration and preservation. Toronto-based urban design and landscape architecture firm PUBLIC WORK will revitalize the public space around College Park, and Toronto-based Hariri Pontarini Architects (HPA) is the project’s design architect.​
CollegePkGWLRA.jpg
GWLRA has tasked the design team with referencing the original vision of architects Ross & Macdonald to create an exciting mixed-use complex at a key node in the city. At this time, there is no confirmed development plan or timeline, and any future development is contingent on City approval. Given the importance of the building to Toronto’s architectural heritage, GWLRA will host a series of events to show the public the ways key members of the design team are thinking about restoring College Park to its rightful place in Toronto’s history.​
“Our goal is to complete that original College Park vision in a way that makes sense for the Toronto of today, while respecting and preserving the heritage architecture,” said Daniel Fama, Vice President of Development, GWLRA. “We want to make College Park a true destination in Toronto. We’ve assembled the best minds in the country, and we want to invite the public into their design process to facilitate meaningful dialogue as we prepare to file a formal development application with the City.”​
“College Park was originally conceived as a spectacular new centre for Toronto,” says ERA Architects Principal Scott Weir. “It’s never quite lived up to that potential. We now have an exciting opportunity to renew the vision of the original architects and create a cultural hub that truly serves the community that’s grown up around College Park, as well as Toronto at large.”​
In March 2025, Weir will present the first in a series of free College Park 100 events, “Restoring the Lost Vision of College Park: An Architectural Icon That Changed Toronto,” in The Carlu’s opulent Round Room. His talk will focus on the original unrealized plans for College Park, and the role heritage architecture will play in bringing new life to Yonge and College Streets. The talk will also mark a rare opportunity for the public to visit this legendary venue, which is designated a National Historic Site of Canada.​
PUBLIC WORK Principal and Co-Founder Marc Ryan and Hariri Pontarini Architects Founding Partner David Pontarini will host College Park 100 events in the following months.​
College Park was originally conceived as a lavish retail landmark akin to New York City’s Rockefeller Center. However, the Great Depression forced a scaling back of the renowned architects Ross and Macdonald’s 30-storey, wedding cake design. When the Eaton Centre opened at Yonge and Dundas in 1977, the building was abandoned to a mishmash of uses and its crown jewel, the seventh-floor auditorium, fell into disrepair. GWLRA took over College Park in 2000 and worked with ERA Architects to restore and reopen the seventh-floor event space in 2003 as The Carlu.​
Today, College Park is surrounded by one of the busiest and most densely populated neighbourhoods in the city, as evidenced by the 250,000 people who pass through the TTC’s College Station each week. GWLRA’s redevelopment plans will include improvements to publicly accessible space behind College Park, as well as the streetscape along Yonge and College. The company aims to maximize community benefit, enhance sustainability and transit access, provide more housing, and upgrade the building’s commercial spaces while minimizing disruptions to local residents, pedestrians, transit riders and drivers during construction.​
For more information and project updates, visit collegepark100.com.​
Front page story coming up!

42
 
The above sounds quite promising...........good team.

However, GWL just finished a hideous Food Court renovation that could only be called tasteless and showed no respect for heritage in the space, uncovering heritage floors only to recover them with new crap.

They've left what should be a grand E-W corridor at the south end of complex greatly diminished for a generation.

And they've hidden the heritage wooden escalator (which I wouldn't expect them to operate, but which should be seen)

@ProjectEnd may have some insight here on how serious GWL are...... to do this properly, they'll have to leave their cheapskates out of it.
 
Last edited:
Tear down (or hide) that ill-conceived residential slab for a start.

AoD
Basically, along with improving the site and restoring elements of the original, they would like to put a new tower up against the big blank wall seen below. I believe about half a dozen years ago they were imaging a new office tower could be added there, but at this point a residential tower would obviously make much more sense. I would hope for significantly improved public realm in not just the POPS area immediately adjacent to the building, but they should be required to fix the godawful parts of Barbara Ann Scott Park at the same time... with some paths that follow desire lines, for one thing. In the meantime, Lacaton & Vassal wouldn't think much of tearing down the old slab... but it would be interesting to see if some new exterior treatment could make it more elegant (well, elegant at all in any way).

57989-180102.jpg

Apple Maps

The front page story is here.

42
 
Basically, along with improving the site and restoring elements of the original, they would like to put a new tower up against the big blank wall seen below. I believe about half a dozen years ago they were imaging a new office tower could be added there, but at this point a residential tower would obviously make much more sense. I would hope for significantly improved public realm in not just the POPS area immediately adjacent to the building, but they should be required to fix the godawful parts of Barbara Ann Scott Park at the same time... with some paths that follow desire lines, for one thing. In the meantime, Lacaton & Vassal wouldn't think much of tearing down the old slab... but it would be interesting to see if some new exterior treatment could make it more elegant (well, elegant at all in any way).

Parks has $350,000 in next year's budget (2026) to fix the disastrous lawn.

I haven't seen the plan, but that's enough to pave one desire line, light it, and re-sod the balance, not much more.
 
Parks has $350,000 in next year's budget (2026) to fix the disastrous lawn.

I haven't seen the plan, but that's enough to pave one desire line, light it, and re-sod the balance, not much more.
That will work as a bandaid for few years. I would hope for something more radical if and when another tower goes up there.

42
 
From the website -

"Originally intended to be an ambitious 38-storey retail landmark..."

"College Park 100 aims to revisit the original vision of Ross & Macdonald and explore the best paths forward towards a more vibrant future, addressing
contemporary challenges of housing, affordability, mobility, public space and programming, and ensuring College Park succeeds as a vital landmark in our city."

So if I am breaking out the key pieces in the second part of my citations, there are three parts to this:
  • Retail Spaces: "Revisit the original vision - an ambitious 38-storey retail landmark"
  • Residential & Community: "housing, affordability, mobility, public space and programming"
  • Tourist Attraction: :"ensuring College Park succeeds as a vital landmark in our city". The word Landmark was used a few times here.
All of these can coexist but not in the current form.

Let's address community, College Park is in a decent place for this, it has two groceries (for two different demographics), a gym, a furniture store, and a winners. It has the actual park, one of the more well used one in DT Toronto. It is situated where you have people from a few walks of life meet. It is literally between two universities,. I felt like it easily clear their goals with regards to housing and community. If they want more housing, I just hope they keep the design language and adds to it.

For Retail, it has a there isn't enough space. Maybe they will revisit the multi-level retail concept again? If there were to do that, they need to reconsider their layout of the retail building. I think they should link Collage Park retail space with the Aura's underground retail space, it would add more retail pathway and improve the much needed access to the Aura retail part. That basically can turn this into a mini-shopping center. Obviously, renovation is needed as the interior are both pretty bad on both.

For being an landmark and attraction, the space has a lot to draw from. I would suggest working with both university to create a museum to showcase History of the area and Toronto at large.

Last and most importantly, redo or undo that 1990 looking food court. I thought I am in an unknown Scarborough mall waiting to be redeveloped when I was there.
 
The property lines/parcels/easements here are quite the web:

1739986314041.png


The Satellite overlay can make it a bit harder to see, so here's the same as above w/o that:

1739986407902.png


If the desire is to project south from the existing black wall, they'll likely have to shift a bit to the west. I've highlighted below a 20M separation distance.

1739986744662.png


Now, arguably, they could go closer at the lower levels, the narrower/west shift as they go up.

Anything outside of in-situ replacement (of the non-heritage components) definitely carries challenges.
 

Back
Top