AlbertC
Superstar
Should've been at least a giant Pop Mart for folks to buy their Labubu's.
- Thread starter AHK
- Start date
flonicky
Senior Member
While the appeals are currently scheduled for a 14-day merit hearing starting on Jan 19, 2026, and despite council's December 2024 direction to remain opposed at the OLT, a recent submission of mediation materials by the proponent to the city indicates a potential path to settlement.
Potential revisions include reducing the height of Building B from 40 to 33 storeys, revising Building C from a 6-storey office building to a 7-storey mixed-use building, and providing 1,150m² of unencumbered, dedicated parkland in the southwest corner of the Site in lieu of the POPS. See slides below:
Renderings and stats currently in the database will remain reflective of the most recent official resubmission until a settlement proposal is publicized or an official resubmission occurs.
Potential revisions include reducing the height of Building B from 40 to 33 storeys, revising Building C from a 6-storey office building to a 7-storey mixed-use building, and providing 1,150m² of unencumbered, dedicated parkland in the southwest corner of the Site in lieu of the POPS. See slides below:
Renderings and stats currently in the database will remain reflective of the most recent official resubmission until a settlement proposal is publicized or an official resubmission occurs.
flonicky
Senior Member
Northern Light
Superstar
Settlement Offer at Council was adopted as is now public:
@Paclo
@HousingNowTO will want to look over the Affordable Unit deal.
@Paclo
@HousingNowTO will want to look over the Affordable Unit deal.
HousingNowTO
Senior Member
Total of 770 Units across 3 buildings -
Building A = 333 units
Building B = 365 units
Building C = 72 units
With SIX (6) units as "Affordable Rental" for 99-years, less than 1% of the units.
Looks like almost all of the local "Community Benefit" was applied to the 5,300+ sq ft of New Community Space in Building-A instead of an additional "Affordable Rental" units.
For Comparison, the SIX (6) units as "Affordable Rental" for 99-years would consume about 3,600 sq ft of GFA.
City Planners, Local Councillor(s) and Local Residents' Groups in Leaside making the same choices over-and-over.
Building A = 333 units
Building B = 365 units
Building C = 72 units
With SIX (6) units as "Affordable Rental" for 99-years, less than 1% of the units.
Looks like almost all of the local "Community Benefit" was applied to the 5,300+ sq ft of New Community Space in Building-A instead of an additional "Affordable Rental" units.
For Comparison, the SIX (6) units as "Affordable Rental" for 99-years would consume about 3,600 sq ft of GFA.
City Planners, Local Councillor(s) and Local Residents' Groups in Leaside making the same choices over-and-over.
1Ć0
Active Member
How did you get access to the confidential attachment? It looks to have been removed from the Council Item - https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.CC32.22