ChesterCopperpot said:
A tale as old as time

"The Protect Our Ravines group insists they are not anti-development – just that this location is not the place for this project."
Click to expand...

I'm in touch w/some area residents, many understand that the real issue here is the STOS buffer, not the height, along with TRCA erosion control access.

Sure the usual suspects are there making noise too, with a plethora of asks/reasons, some more sincere than others.

Really though, the proponent here has to pull in the west side of the building.

The height is not an environmental issue at all, since the proposal is situated north of the ravine, there is no shadow here to speak of.........

The neighbours are free to object to the height, but can't use any green fig leaves on that one.
 
Northern Light said:
Thumbing through the App, we see that an additional parcel was purchased and added to the assembly here.

View attachment 452474
View attachment 452475

Street view of the added property:


View attachment 452476

***

The landscape plans flag a couple of issues here:

1) No street trees on the Kingston Road frontage

2) Did they run by the TRCA the idea of building within the 10M buffer from the Long-Term Stable Top of Bank? That didn't work out for Diamond...............I see TRCA did comment (and staked the LTSS) very peculiar.

View attachment 452477
Click to expand...

Northern Light said:
First CMC here is April 2nd, 2025

Bousfields has newly registered to lobby on this one, so I think we can presume some discussions are either ongoing or imminent.
Click to expand...
How do you see Bousfields as a lobbyist? I can't find that in the registry.
 
city_dweller said:
How do you see Bousfield
1755227389479.png
s as a lobbyist? I can't find that in the registry.
Click to expand...

Not sure what issue you're having.

I just typed it into the search field and this is what I got back:
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top