[UtakataNoAnnex]

What chutzpah!

Filing a development proposal for land you don't own, lease or have under contract!

I'm not sure if it meets the definition of fraud in the criminal sense; but morally this is abysmal.

But they are retracting this proposal, right? After they've been caught with their hands in the cookie jar?

 

[Metroscapes]

Not the majority, just the RBC parcel adjacent to Sneeky Dees. But it's enough. If you don't have everything in an assembly, especially non bookend pieces, you don't have anything.

View attachment 748552
View attachment 748553

And then...

View attachment 748554

Absolutely incredible stuf...

As someone who works professionally in Ontario land development policy:

loooooooooollll
you can't make this stuff up

 

[Northern Light]

But they are retracting this proposal, right? After they've been caught with their hands in the cookie jar?

Yep!

 

[ProjectEnd]

What chutzpah!

Filing a development proposal for land you don't own, lease or have under contract!

I'm not sure if it meets the definition of fraud in the criminal sense; but morally this is abysmal.

But they are retracting this proposal, right? After they've been caught with their hands in the cookie jar?

Technically this isn't against the Planning Act. You can absolutely zone land you don't own. But just what Stan was planning to do after this who knows as he would have needed RBC to sign off on the SPA app. and would have needed them to sell the zoned assembly, if it were going that more-likely route.

HOWEVERRRRRRR...

In this case, Stan was just...lying:

 

[UtakataNoAnnex]

...it's almost though he was doing this thinking nobody would of noticed. >.<

 

[ChesterCopperpot]

No-one did notice........................... for six years!!!!

 

[UtakataNoAnnex]

..oh right, that date when it was signed. Clown shoes epic!

 

[Tuscani01]

Definitely ‘innovative’