You're right to point out that Toronto does a better job than Boston, but we shouldn't take that as evidence that we're doing enough. Although I'm thankful that Toronto makes an effort to retain exterior facades, it's also true that 99% of these 'saved' buildings end up at the city dump.

The Concourse Building may look like it's still there but it's really just a nod to what once existed. 2 exterior walls are better than none but at the rate we're going the only intact heritage interiors will be photos in a book at Indigo.


Beautiful exterior but 99% of the Concourse Building was destroyed

2017 .... EY Tower & Concourse Building Facade .... 100 Adelaide Street West .... Toronto, Ontario by Greg's Southern Ontario (Catching Up Slowly), on Flickr
 

Attachments

  • 1674445966058.png
    1674445966058.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 91
Last edited:
I certainly agree that more should be done to retain historical interiors but at the end of the day I would much rather have the building facade than nothing at all. Below are 3 examples in Boston that were recently demolished. Had these been in Toronto I'm sure that the facades would have been retained.

View attachment 451761

330 Boylston Street, demolished 2022.

View attachment 451762
258 Huntington Avenue. Built 1916, demolished 2022.

View attachment 451763
543 Commonwealth Avenue, demolished 2019.

By no means am I saying Boston doesn't care about historic preservation, the city has as much historical architecture as it does due to some of the measures in place. That said, when compared to Toronto, they're doing a pretty bad job by allowing developers to start with a clean slate on a large number of projects. Not much is changing either, these buildings were all approved for demolition this week too:

View attachment 451904

View attachment 451905

View attachment 451906

I'll refrain from going off on a further tangent but my point is that things might seem better elsewhere but those in Toronto should be thankful for the level of preservation that is considered for historic building facades.
Wow! Toronto would cherish these buildings in this city for thier facades today!
 
You're right to point out that Toronto does a better job than Boston, but we shouldn't take that as evidence that we're doing enough. Although I'm thankful that Toronto makes an effort to retain exterior facades, it's also true that 99% of these 'saved' buildings end up at the city dump.

The Concourse Building may look like it's still there but it's really just a nod to what once existed. 2 exterior walls are better than none but at the rate we're going the only intact heritage interiors will be photos in a book at Indigo.


Beautiful exterior but 99% of the Concourse Building was destroyed

2017 .... EY Tower & Concourse Building Facade .... 100 Adelaide Street West .... Toronto, Ontario by Greg's Southern Ontario (Catching Up Slowly), on Flickr
99% of the Concourse Building was unusable. It wasn't wanted as office space anymore, (owners have to maintain buildings, if not, they gradually crumble, so they have to be able to rent the space at a decent rate), and no-one could afford to adapt it for housing; for one example, it's worth reminding people that washrooms in the Concourse Building were all either a half flight above or below whatever level you were on, meaning it was an accessibility nightmare that would have been very expensive to bring up to code. In the end, we have been left with a beautifully rebuilt exterior and a lobby that saves some impressive features, so I'm not bothered by what happened here, and not sure what the point is of making an example of this one.

Anyway, on Maitland Street, we have some lovely older residential buildings that are not in danger of not being rentable. This is simply a case of a landlord knowing that if they can get it upzoned, they can make a lot more money on that same land. More housing on that same land will play some part in easing our housing crisis, like every build does. Is that worth losing some lovely older large apartment suites (which will be replaced by new, generic, far better kitted-out for modern living suites of the same size) to get all the new condos? Until we allow three or four units on every property in the yellowbelt, we're going to be asked this question again and again, as we have few other ways to address the housing shortage at the moment.

42
 
Storey count changed from 61 storey to 56 storey. Height changed from 197.75m to 183.00m. The total unit count changed from 529 units to 532 units. The total parking changed from 93 parking to 102 parking. The total bike parking changed from 656 bike parking to 584 bike parking.


Rendering taken from the arch plan via rezoning submission.

@Northern Light ;)😉😉

PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland-401.jpg


PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland-403.jpg


PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland-405.jpg

PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland-407.jpg
 
SPA moving along here with a technical resubmission in pursuit of NOAC. No stat changes or new renderings. No permit activity yet.
 
Thought you all might enjoy some pics/memories of The Maitlands.
I pretty much lived on my friend's futon here when I was 19 back in 2010-2011, I did struggle to find photos where I was wearing a shirt and there was no marijuana paraphernalia haha
It took us 4 days of scrubbing everything clean before my friends moved in, it had previously been occupied by drug addicts and the landlord did not offer to clean it, but the rent was only $1400 for a two bedroom.
The building was mostly empty at the time as the owners were renovating the units, I'll never forget the smell of the hallways and the noisy creaking floors, having to walk-up and down all the flights of stairs.
It had a claw foot tub, the kitchen had a checkerboard floor and old gas range stove, the living room fireplace had green tile, all of the windows had beautiful stained glass transoms (lead), the double hung windows opened with a pully-system, the doorknobs were glass works of art, there was chicken wire over the outside of the windows to deter pigeons, the radiators could not be controlled and there was no air conditioning so it was always extremely hot, you could fall through the walls if you leaned against them, residents mingled on the front steps at all hours, and many groups of drug addicts/artists were squatting in apartments they refused to leave.
The Gay Village area or "gay ghetto" was extremely poor at this time, very bohemian like Kensington at the same time, homophobia kept rents cheap and there was no investment (pre-Loblaws era).
Yonge street was strip clubs, porn theatres, adult video rental/sex toy shops, illegal pot lounges, bong shops, bootleg DVD/fake ID shops, and some gay businesses that hadn't yet moved to Church street.
There also was no skyscrapers on Yonge, in the summer sun your shoes would melt on the scorching sidewalks.
Scientologists were everywhere trying to recruit, alongside Christians preaching for the salvation of gays, and sex workers that walked their routes in shockingly high heels.
The historic buildings were crumbling and pigeon infested, the old Empress hotel collapsed onto the sidewalk and was sadly demolished.
The 2nd photo is moving out after the landlord gave a renovation eviction order, they ripped out basically everything, we saw the stained glass windows and glass door knobs for sale at an antique store.
Renovictions were rampant Downtown at this time, particularly as Akelius bought up all of the old apartments and aggressively evicted, the area started changing very quickly in the next few years.
Hope you enjoyed this story time of a bygone era.
Maitlands 1.jpg
Maitlands 2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Technical resubmission including the following, from the cover letter:
minor changes to the Council-approved Conservation Plan were required to address feedback provided by the City’s Urban Design Department and to incorporate design changes that respond to functional and/or Ontario Building Code (OBC) requirement, some of which are related to the rental replacement uses which will be contained in the podium of the new development

NOAC not issued and no permits applied for.

Latest renderset:
PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland Street (1)-394.jpg

PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland Street (1)-395.jpg

PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland Street (1)-0.jpg

PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland Street (1)-397.jpg

PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland Street (1)-398.jpg


---

**EDIT AUG 26**: Another technical resubmission here in August in pursuit of NOAC. Still no permit activity.
 

Attachments

  • PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland Street (1)-396.jpg
    PLN - Architectural Plans - Architectural Plans_34-42 Maitland Street (1)-396.jpg
    227.4 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:

Back
Top