[ComptoirGeneral]

Given the previous plan to relocate their HQ as part of redeveloping the Skydome seems dead in the water, it would make sense that some sort of development is planned here.

Were they planning to move into the now delayed Union Park?

 

[Koops65]

Merry Christmas all!

Link to HD render

 

[rbt]

Meeting notice.

 

[Strange Advance]

All rental, so it should move ahead, no?

 

[jmi22]

It's just a zone and flip, markets not there for anywhere near the density they are proposing, especially in this chunk of downtown.

 

[Northern Light]

There's a Heritage Preservation report on the applicable properties within this proposal heading to next week's Planning and Housing Ctte.

https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PH30.10

This got me to wondering if there had been updated Docs and indeed there have.

So I will summon @Paclo to investigate the details.

A convenience link:

Application Details

www.toronto.ca

I must admit, people who don't proof read confuse me.... LOL From the Project Data Sheet:

Really? That many units?

***

Of course, the next section gives you the info:

 

[Paclo]

There's a Heritage Preservation report on the applicable properties within this proposal heading to next week's Planning and Housing Ctte.

https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PH30.10

This got me to wondering if there had been updated Docs and indeed there have.

So I will summon @Paclo to investigate the details.

• Still 60 & 56 storeys (heights of both towers slightly increased to 204.55 & 194.55m)
• Total units up from 1362 to 1419
• Total rental replacement units down from 33 to 32 (more info about this in the housing issues report)
• Addition of a new 214.93 m2 POPS at the south of the site fronting Isabella

Updated renderings:

 

[AlexBozikovic]

The glass at the base is the typical Toronto response to the presence of brick heritage buildings. That’s an unsophisticated and unattractive solution. And here it wrecks the tower architecture; glazing at grade and masonry above feels precarious.

 

[Northern Light]

The glass at the base is the typical Toronto response to the presence of brick heritage buildings. That’s an unsophisticated and unattractive solution. And here it wrecks the tower architecture; glazing at grade and masonry above feels precarious.

Agree; but let me add, its ugly and it makes no sense contextually in terms of relating to the heritage.

It need not be pastiche, but it ought make some effort to 'fit'

 

[mferna]

Read our latest update on this development here: https://urbantoronto.ca/news/2026/0...ers-revised-more-suites-fewer-elevators.60970